Investigation of route optimization for mobile ad hoc NEMO (MANEMO) based proposals
In the doorway of the Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), it was considered as the standard protocol that support the host mobility. Due to its limitation that does not support the Mobile Routers (MRs), the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has introduced the NEMO Basic Support (NEMO BS) protocol. The Mobi...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
INSI Publications
2011
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/11438/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/11438/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/11438/4/investigation.pdf |
| Summary: | In the doorway of the Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6), it was considered as the standard protocol that
support the host mobility. Due to its limitation that does not support the Mobile Routers (MRs), the
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has introduced the NEMO Basic Support (NEMO BS)
protocol. The Mobile Ad hoc Network (MANET) routing protocol provides the local and the direct
communications between two mobile devices within the Nested NEMO (when multiple MRs are
connected together). Integrating the MANET and the NEMO (MANEMO) provides the necessary
additions to the existing protocols (IPv6, Neighbour Discovery (ND), and NEMO) to support the
Nested MRs. It provides a mechanism to select the most suitable path to the Exit Router (ER) as a
default in the MANEMO Fringe Stub (MFS). The NCM (NEMO centric MANEMO) protocol is
introduced to address the Nested NEMO issues (e.g. pinball problem) by using the MANET routing
a protocol (i.e. OLSR), while the MCM (MANET centric MANEMO) protocol is introduced to
address the MANET problem (e.g. Internet connectivity). The main aim of this paper is to investigate
the current approaches that are introduced to provide the Route Optimization (RO) for the NEMO.
It highlights the strengths and the limitations of these approaches. Both the qualitative and the
quantitative evolutions of these proposals are hereby presented. |
|---|