Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation?

Multi-ethnic and multi-religious make up of Malaysian society requires a deft hand in managing ethnic relation. Malaysia has histories of flares of ethnic relations such as the May 13 incident in 1969. One of the causes attributed to the incident is unruly speeches that incite inter ethnic hatred. A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shuaib, Farid Sufian
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
English
Published: 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/1/MuzzlingCommunication_PACA_2009_IREP.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/4/PACA2009_AcceptanceAbstract_Sept08.pdf
id iium-17081
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-170812013-06-20T01:31:36Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/ Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation? Shuaib, Farid Sufian H96 Public policy (General), Policy sciences JF Political institutions (General) K Law (General) Multi-ethnic and multi-religious make up of Malaysian society requires a deft hand in managing ethnic relation. Malaysia has histories of flares of ethnic relations such as the May 13 incident in 1969. One of the causes attributed to the incident is unruly speeches that incite inter ethnic hatred. Apart from social and economic policies and action-plans, laws regarding speech could also be used as a tool to prevent such incidents. Sedition law is one of the legislation uses to suppress speech that may incite violence between ethnic groups. The law has been used in number of incidents including political speeches that tend to cause ill feeling and hostility between ethnic groups. The courts have also decided in several cases to punish writers of seditious publication. However, there were also criticisms of abuse of sedition law in suppressing or inhibiting dissent against the government of the day. After 60 years of the Sedition Act 1948, it is timely to consider its usefulness and efficacy in managing ethnic relations. The paper seeks to analyse the use and abuse of sedition law by looking at legislation, judgement of the courts and reported incidents regarding sedition law. The paper also will consider whether there is a better legislative scheme to do the job of managing ethnic relation without abuse by politician. 2009 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/1/MuzzlingCommunication_PACA_2009_IREP.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/4/PACA2009_AcceptanceAbstract_Sept08.pdf Shuaib, Farid Sufian (2009) Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation? In: 7th Biennial PACA International Conference: Communication Encounters Across Cultures, 10-12 January 2009, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia. (Unpublished)
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
English
topic H96 Public policy (General), Policy sciences
JF Political institutions (General)
K Law (General)
spellingShingle H96 Public policy (General), Policy sciences
JF Political institutions (General)
K Law (General)
Shuaib, Farid Sufian
Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation?
description Multi-ethnic and multi-religious make up of Malaysian society requires a deft hand in managing ethnic relation. Malaysia has histories of flares of ethnic relations such as the May 13 incident in 1969. One of the causes attributed to the incident is unruly speeches that incite inter ethnic hatred. Apart from social and economic policies and action-plans, laws regarding speech could also be used as a tool to prevent such incidents. Sedition law is one of the legislation uses to suppress speech that may incite violence between ethnic groups. The law has been used in number of incidents including political speeches that tend to cause ill feeling and hostility between ethnic groups. The courts have also decided in several cases to punish writers of seditious publication. However, there were also criticisms of abuse of sedition law in suppressing or inhibiting dissent against the government of the day. After 60 years of the Sedition Act 1948, it is timely to consider its usefulness and efficacy in managing ethnic relations. The paper seeks to analyse the use and abuse of sedition law by looking at legislation, judgement of the courts and reported incidents regarding sedition law. The paper also will consider whether there is a better legislative scheme to do the job of managing ethnic relation without abuse by politician.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Shuaib, Farid Sufian
author_facet Shuaib, Farid Sufian
author_sort Shuaib, Farid Sufian
title Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation?
title_short Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation?
title_full Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation?
title_fullStr Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation?
title_full_unstemmed Muzzling communication: Sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation?
title_sort muzzling communication: sedition law as a political tool to suppress dissent or a legal tool to manage ethnic relation?
publishDate 2009
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/1/MuzzlingCommunication_PACA_2009_IREP.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/17081/4/PACA2009_AcceptanceAbstract_Sept08.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:25:53Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:25:53Z
_version_ 1777408413632823296