Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan

This paper provides a comparative study of sustainable dispute management practices in Malaysia and Japan. With a focus on land-related disputes, the tangible and measurable objectives of the study include the identification of common trends in court-annexed dispute management in Malaysia and Japan;...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi, Kadouf, Hunud Abia
Format:	Conference or Workshop Item
Language:	English
Published:	2012
Subjects:	K Law (General)
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/1/Court-annexed_Dispute_Management_in_Land_Disputes_-_Malaysia_and_Japan.pdf

id	iium-27274
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-272742012-12-18T00:26:23Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/ Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi Kadouf, Hunud Abia K Law (General) This paper provides a comparative study of sustainable dispute management practices in Malaysia and Japan. With a focus on land-related disputes, the tangible and measurable objectives of the study include the identification of common trends in court-annexed dispute management in Malaysia and Japan; sustainable practices in court-annexed ADR that would engender prudent land management; the rate of out-of-court settlement in land disputes and its impact on the interest of the parties and ends of justice; and some unique trends the two countries can learn from each other to ensure a sustainable case management programme for land-related disputes. This study utilizes both the doctrinal research method and the empirical method for the Japanese and Malaysian aspects respectively to establish the common trends between the two jurisdictions. The study is expected to show that a comparative study on court-annexed dispute management between the two Asian countries can help in defining new directions in law reforms for sustainable land disputes management in the two jurisdictions. Such settlement would bring about mutual satisfaction among the disputing parties, avoidance of appeal backlogs, and foster a sustainable peace within the environment. 2012-11-15 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/1/Court-annexed_Dispute_Management_in_Land_Disputes_-_Malaysia_and_Japan.pdf Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi and Kadouf, Hunud Abia (2012) Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan. In: IIUM-Toyo University Joint Symposium, 15 November 2012, Tokyo, Japan. (Unpublished) http://iium.edu.my/kaed/events/joint-symposium-iium-toyo-university-call-papers-participations
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	K Law (General)
spellingShingle	K Law (General) Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi Kadouf, Hunud Abia Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
description	This paper provides a comparative study of sustainable dispute management practices in Malaysia and Japan. With a focus on land-related disputes, the tangible and measurable objectives of the study include the identification of common trends in court-annexed dispute management in Malaysia and Japan; sustainable practices in court-annexed ADR that would engender prudent land management; the rate of out-of-court settlement in land disputes and its impact on the interest of the parties and ends of justice; and some unique trends the two countries can learn from each other to ensure a sustainable case management programme for land-related disputes. This study utilizes both the doctrinal research method and the empirical method for the Japanese and Malaysian aspects respectively to establish the common trends between the two jurisdictions. The study is expected to show that a comparative study on court-annexed dispute management between the two Asian countries can help in defining new directions in law reforms for sustainable land disputes management in the two jurisdictions. Such settlement would bring about mutual satisfaction among the disputing parties, avoidance of appeal backlogs, and foster a sustainable peace within the environment.
format	Conference or Workshop Item
author	Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi Kadouf, Hunud Abia
author_facet	Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi Kadouf, Hunud Abia
author_sort	Oseni, Umar Aimhanosi
title	Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_short	Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_full	Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_fullStr	Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_full_unstemmed	Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan
title_sort	comparative dispute management in land disputes: court-annexed adr in malaysia and japan
publishDate	2012
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/27274/1/Court-annexed_Dispute_Management_in_Land_Disputes_-_Malaysia_and_Japan.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T20:40:34Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T20:40:34Z
_version_	1777409336772919296

Comparative Dispute Management in Land Disputes: Court-annexed ADR in Malaysia and Japan

Similar Items