Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople

In his Sahih, Imam Muslim narrated that Abu Hurayrah spoke about the conquest of Constantinople based on a prophetic tradition attributed to the Prophet Muhammad in which he said: “The Hour will not rise until seventy thousand people from among the descents of Isaac conquer Constantinople.” Some H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammed Salim , Al-Amari, Fauzi , Deraman, Bensaid, Benouda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IDOSI Publications 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/27780/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27780/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27780/1/Children_of_Isaac_or_Ishmael.pdf
id iium-27780
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-277802014-07-16T05:45:27Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/27780/ Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople Mohammed Salim , Al-Amari Fauzi , Deraman Bensaid, Benouda BP173.2 Sources of Islam In his Sahih, Imam Muslim narrated that Abu Hurayrah spoke about the conquest of Constantinople based on a prophetic tradition attributed to the Prophet Muhammad in which he said: “The Hour will not rise until seventy thousand people from among the descents of Isaac conquer Constantinople.” Some Hadith interpreters were confused on the use of “Sons of Isaac” arguing that the true phrase must be “The Sons of Ishmael” instead. This they argued is inferred from other Prophetic traditions who describe the army conquering Constantinople as being from the city of the Prophet, the Medina which implies that the conquering army is rather Arabs, the descent of Ishmael. In this paper we seek to discuss this confusion and clarify the points of dispute around the proper understanding of this tradition. Our inquiry shows the confusion is only superficial and there is no conflict between these different traditions. Such a result implies the unnecessary undermining of the position of Imam Muslim in his hadith collection. This research discusses the doubt some Hadith commentators of Sahih Muslim find and their conclusion that the memory of some Hadith narrators skipped a word. We shall highlight the context of the Hadith, examine the question of doubt and position, discuss the scholarly views on this question and see what preferable and most reasonable answer should solve the question under study IDOSI Publications 2012-09-11 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/27780/1/Children_of_Isaac_or_Ishmael.pdf Mohammed Salim , Al-Amari and Fauzi , Deraman and Bensaid, Benouda (2012) Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research (MEJSR), 11 ( (9)). pp. 1266-1271. ISSN 1990-9233 http://idosi.org/mejsr/mejsr11(9)12/16.pdf
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic BP173.2 Sources of Islam
spellingShingle BP173.2 Sources of Islam
Mohammed Salim , Al-Amari
Fauzi , Deraman
Bensaid, Benouda
Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople
description In his Sahih, Imam Muslim narrated that Abu Hurayrah spoke about the conquest of Constantinople based on a prophetic tradition attributed to the Prophet Muhammad in which he said: “The Hour will not rise until seventy thousand people from among the descents of Isaac conquer Constantinople.” Some Hadith interpreters were confused on the use of “Sons of Isaac” arguing that the true phrase must be “The Sons of Ishmael” instead. This they argued is inferred from other Prophetic traditions who describe the army conquering Constantinople as being from the city of the Prophet, the Medina which implies that the conquering army is rather Arabs, the descent of Ishmael. In this paper we seek to discuss this confusion and clarify the points of dispute around the proper understanding of this tradition. Our inquiry shows the confusion is only superficial and there is no conflict between these different traditions. Such a result implies the unnecessary undermining of the position of Imam Muslim in his hadith collection. This research discusses the doubt some Hadith commentators of Sahih Muslim find and their conclusion that the memory of some Hadith narrators skipped a word. We shall highlight the context of the Hadith, examine the question of doubt and position, discuss the scholarly views on this question and see what preferable and most reasonable answer should solve the question under study
format Article
author Mohammed Salim , Al-Amari
Fauzi , Deraman
Bensaid, Benouda
author_facet Mohammed Salim , Al-Amari
Fauzi , Deraman
Bensaid, Benouda
author_sort Mohammed Salim , Al-Amari
title Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople
title_short Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople
title_full Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople
title_fullStr Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople
title_full_unstemmed Children of Isaac or Ishmael? a critical examination of Abu Hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of Constantinople
title_sort children of isaac or ishmael? a critical examination of abu hurayrah’s narration on the conquest of constantinople
publisher IDOSI Publications
publishDate 2012
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/27780/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27780/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/27780/1/Children_of_Isaac_or_Ishmael.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:41:10Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:41:10Z
_version_ 1777409374842519552