Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?

OBJECTIVES: Bronchoscopy is an essential investigative tool in many respiratory complaints. The procedure can be unpleasant for both bronchoscopists and patients. To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few studies that correlate the bronchoscopist's satisfaction with that of the patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri, Mohd Shah, Azarisman Shah, Abdul Rani, Mohammed Fauzi, Harun, Roslan, Abdul Manap, Roslina, Tajudin, Nor Adina, Mohd. Anshar, Fauzi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Royal Society of Medicine Press 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/2/Can_a_bronchoscopist_reliably_assess_a_patient%27s_experience_of_bronchoscopy.pdf
id iium-3389
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-33892012-01-27T03:02:29Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/ Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy? Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Mohd Shah, Azarisman Shah Abdul Rani, Mohammed Fauzi Harun, Roslan Abdul Manap, Roslina Tajudin, Nor Adina Mohd. Anshar, Fauzi RC Internal medicine OBJECTIVES: Bronchoscopy is an essential investigative tool in many respiratory complaints. The procedure can be unpleasant for both bronchoscopists and patients. To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few studies that correlate the bronchoscopist's satisfaction with that of the patient's during bronchoscopy. The aim of our study is to assess whether or not a bronchoscopist could reliably assess a patient's satisfaction during bronchoscopy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study with convenience sampling. SETTING: Patients attending flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy appointments at the bronchoscopy suite, Respiratory Unit, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC), Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia between March and September 2006. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients undergoing bronchoscopy over a 6-month period completed a questionnaire after the procedure. All patients received standard pre-medication with intravenous midazolam. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bronchoscopists and patients rated the level of satisfaction of the procedure using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Lower scores indicated better satisfaction or less discomfort. Patients and bronchoscopists also rated coughing, choking and vomiting perception using the same 10 cm VAS. Reliability analysis (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]) was used to analyse the correlation between patients' and bronchoscopists' VAS scores. RESULTS: All 60 patients answered the questionnaire. The median overall satisfaction scored by bronchoscopists was 2.2 (2.0) with a non-significant (p = 0.880) trend to a better median overall satisfaction of 1.9 (2.3) scored by patients. The VAS scores for cough sensation were 1.9 (2.7) and 1.5 (5.0), respectively. There was positive correlation between bronchoscopists' and patients' VAS scores for coughing sensation (p = 0.047, ICC = 0.233). No significant correlation for overall satisfaction, vomiting sensation and choking sensation was found. CONCLUSION: Positive correlation for cough perception suggested that the bronchoscopist could reliably assess the degree of cough discomfort patients experience during bronchoscopy. Royal Society of Medicine Press 2010-09-28 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/2/Can_a_bronchoscopist_reliably_assess_a_patient%27s_experience_of_bronchoscopy.pdf Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri and Mohd Shah, Azarisman Shah and Abdul Rani, Mohammed Fauzi and Harun, Roslan and Abdul Manap, Roslina and Tajudin, Nor Adina and Mohd. Anshar, Fauzi (2010) Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine (JRSM) Short Reports, 1 (4). 35 (1)-(7). ISSN 2042-533 http://shortreports.rsmjournals.com/content/1/4/35.figures-only 21103127[PubMed]
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic RC Internal medicine
spellingShingle RC Internal medicine
Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri
Mohd Shah, Azarisman Shah
Abdul Rani, Mohammed Fauzi
Harun, Roslan
Abdul Manap, Roslina
Tajudin, Nor Adina
Mohd. Anshar, Fauzi
Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?
description OBJECTIVES: Bronchoscopy is an essential investigative tool in many respiratory complaints. The procedure can be unpleasant for both bronchoscopists and patients. To the best of our knowledge, there are only a few studies that correlate the bronchoscopist's satisfaction with that of the patient's during bronchoscopy. The aim of our study is to assess whether or not a bronchoscopist could reliably assess a patient's satisfaction during bronchoscopy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, observational study with convenience sampling. SETTING: Patients attending flexible fibreoptic bronchoscopy appointments at the bronchoscopy suite, Respiratory Unit, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre (UKMMC), Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia between March and September 2006. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty patients undergoing bronchoscopy over a 6-month period completed a questionnaire after the procedure. All patients received standard pre-medication with intravenous midazolam. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bronchoscopists and patients rated the level of satisfaction of the procedure using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). Lower scores indicated better satisfaction or less discomfort. Patients and bronchoscopists also rated coughing, choking and vomiting perception using the same 10 cm VAS. Reliability analysis (intra-class correlation coefficient [ICC]) was used to analyse the correlation between patients' and bronchoscopists' VAS scores. RESULTS: All 60 patients answered the questionnaire. The median overall satisfaction scored by bronchoscopists was 2.2 (2.0) with a non-significant (p = 0.880) trend to a better median overall satisfaction of 1.9 (2.3) scored by patients. The VAS scores for cough sensation were 1.9 (2.7) and 1.5 (5.0), respectively. There was positive correlation between bronchoscopists' and patients' VAS scores for coughing sensation (p = 0.047, ICC = 0.233). No significant correlation for overall satisfaction, vomiting sensation and choking sensation was found. CONCLUSION: Positive correlation for cough perception suggested that the bronchoscopist could reliably assess the degree of cough discomfort patients experience during bronchoscopy.
format Article
author Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri
Mohd Shah, Azarisman Shah
Abdul Rani, Mohammed Fauzi
Harun, Roslan
Abdul Manap, Roslina
Tajudin, Nor Adina
Mohd. Anshar, Fauzi
author_facet Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri
Mohd Shah, Azarisman Shah
Abdul Rani, Mohammed Fauzi
Harun, Roslan
Abdul Manap, Roslina
Tajudin, Nor Adina
Mohd. Anshar, Fauzi
author_sort Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri
title Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?
title_short Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?
title_full Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?
title_fullStr Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?
title_full_unstemmed Can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?
title_sort can a bronchoscopist reliably assess a patient's experience of bronchoscopy?
publisher Royal Society of Medicine Press
publishDate 2010
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/3389/2/Can_a_bronchoscopist_reliably_assess_a_patient%27s_experience_of_bronchoscopy.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:11:12Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:11:12Z
_version_ 1777407489904476160