The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of posterior composite resin through the amount of microleakage. Materials and Methods: 72 Cl V cavities were prepared in 36 teeth (extracted upper first premolar), one buccally and one palatally in each tooth, the cavities were loca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdul Majeed, Kais Raad, Choon, LC
Format: Conference or Workshop Item
Language:English
English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/1/EPA_2014.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/2/EPA2014_AbstractsBook.pdf
id iium-42732
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-427322015-04-20T09:03:28Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/ The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration Abdul Majeed, Kais Raad Choon, LC RK Dentistry The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of posterior composite resin through the amount of microleakage. Materials and Methods: 72 Cl V cavities were prepared in 36 teeth (extracted upper first premolar), one buccally and one palatally in each tooth, the cavities were located in the middle third of the crown. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (24 cavities for each group); Group A: filled with Helio- molar radiopaque composite. Group B: filled with Tetricceram composite. Group C: filled with an Ariston PHc composite . After the teeth were filled, they were restored in normal physiological saline in an incubator at 37 oC. one third of each group (8 cavities) were thermocycled for one day (30 cycle), 2nd third thermocycled for 10 days (300 cycle), and the last third thermocycled for 100 days (3000 cycle). One-way-ANOVA-analysis revealed significant differences among the groups (p<0.05) in the terms of the cost effectiveness, The results revealed that the Ariston Phc composite has better cost effectiveness from the other tested types. It is not a significant difference between Group C and B, and it is a significant difference between Group C and A. Material C has better cost effective than other tested materials. None of the materials tested was able to achieve the absolute cost effectiveness. 2014 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/1/EPA_2014.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/2/EPA2014_AbstractsBook.pdf Abdul Majeed, Kais Raad and Choon, LC (2014) The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration. In: 38th Annual Conference of the European Prosthodontic Association & 21st Scientific Congress of the Turkish Prosthodontic and Implantology Association, 25-27 Sep 2014, Istanbul, Turkey. http://www.epa2014.org/pdf/AbstractsBook.pdf
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
English
topic RK Dentistry
spellingShingle RK Dentistry
Abdul Majeed, Kais Raad
Choon, LC
The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration
description The purpose of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of posterior composite resin through the amount of microleakage. Materials and Methods: 72 Cl V cavities were prepared in 36 teeth (extracted upper first premolar), one buccally and one palatally in each tooth, the cavities were located in the middle third of the crown. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups (24 cavities for each group); Group A: filled with Helio- molar radiopaque composite. Group B: filled with Tetricceram composite. Group C: filled with an Ariston PHc composite . After the teeth were filled, they were restored in normal physiological saline in an incubator at 37 oC. one third of each group (8 cavities) were thermocycled for one day (30 cycle), 2nd third thermocycled for 10 days (300 cycle), and the last third thermocycled for 100 days (3000 cycle). One-way-ANOVA-analysis revealed significant differences among the groups (p<0.05) in the terms of the cost effectiveness, The results revealed that the Ariston Phc composite has better cost effectiveness from the other tested types. It is not a significant difference between Group C and B, and it is a significant difference between Group C and A. Material C has better cost effective than other tested materials. None of the materials tested was able to achieve the absolute cost effectiveness.
format Conference or Workshop Item
author Abdul Majeed, Kais Raad
Choon, LC
author_facet Abdul Majeed, Kais Raad
Choon, LC
author_sort Abdul Majeed, Kais Raad
title The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration
title_short The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration
title_full The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration
title_fullStr The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration
title_full_unstemmed The estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration
title_sort estimation of cost effectiveness of the composite restoration
publishDate 2014
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/1/EPA_2014.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/42732/2/EPA2014_AbstractsBook.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:00:54Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:00:54Z
_version_ 1777410616265277440