الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل = al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil
This article discusses the question of analogical reasoning (qiyÉs) in the prescribed categorical penalties (ÍudËd) in order show whether they are predominantly subject to ratiocination and causation (taÑlÊl) or to mere devotional submission (tÑabbud). The study has demonstrated that, as a matter of...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
International Islamic University Press
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/43132/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/43132/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/43132/1/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%AF_%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%84.PDF |
| id |
iium-43132 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
eprints |
| spelling |
iium-431322017-11-03T07:40:28Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/43132/ الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل = al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil Laeba, Muhammad Eswikar, Abdul Majid Qasim Abdul al-Majid BP140 Islamic law (Fiqh) This article discusses the question of analogical reasoning (qiyÉs) in the prescribed categorical penalties (ÍudËd) in order show whether they are predominantly subject to ratiocination and causation (taÑlÊl) or to mere devotional submission (tÑabbud). The study has demonstrated that, as a matter of general principle, ÍudËd penalties are of a devotional character, they are individually subject to ratiocination, and hence they constitutes a base of analogical reasoning for arising new criminal issues. It has also shown that the majority of the jurists subscribe to ratiocination and causation in ÍudËd provided its requirements are fulfilled. Those who reject such a proposition, which is the position of most Hanafi jurists, do so not on the ground of devotional submission, but on the ground that analogical reasoning holds only for evaluative judgements (aÍkÉm) and not for names (asmÉ’). For them, linguistic matters are not established through analogies by through authority and transmission. The article has arrived at the conclusion that there is a wide room for analogical reasoning in ÍudËd whereby new criminal problems can be dealt with, no matter how variegated and complicated they might be. International Islamic University Press 2014 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/43132/1/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%AF_%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%84.PDF Laeba, Muhammad and Eswikar, Abdul Majid Qasim Abdul al-Majid (2014) الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل = al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil. al-Tajdid , 18 (35). pp. 79-109. ISSN 1823-1926 http://www.iium.edu.my/irkhs/research/journals/tajdid |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Local University |
| institution |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
| building |
IIUM Repository |
| collection |
Online Access |
| language |
English |
| topic |
BP140 Islamic law (Fiqh) |
| spellingShingle |
BP140 Islamic law (Fiqh) Laeba, Muhammad Eswikar, Abdul Majid Qasim Abdul al-Majid الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل = al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil |
| description |
This article discusses the question of analogical reasoning (qiyÉs) in the prescribed categorical penalties (ÍudËd) in order show whether they are predominantly subject to ratiocination and causation (taÑlÊl) or to mere devotional submission (tÑabbud). The study has demonstrated that, as a matter of general principle, ÍudËd penalties are of a devotional character, they are individually subject to ratiocination, and hence they constitutes a base of analogical reasoning for arising new criminal issues. It has also shown that the majority of the jurists subscribe to ratiocination and causation in ÍudËd provided its requirements are fulfilled. Those who reject such a proposition, which is the position of most Hanafi jurists, do so not on the ground of devotional submission, but on the ground that analogical reasoning holds only for evaluative judgements (aÍkÉm) and not for names (asmÉ’). For them, linguistic matters are not established through analogies by through authority and transmission. The article has arrived at the conclusion that there is a wide room for analogical reasoning in ÍudËd whereby new criminal problems can be dealt with, no matter how variegated and complicated they might be. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Laeba, Muhammad Eswikar, Abdul Majid Qasim Abdul al-Majid |
| author_facet |
Laeba, Muhammad Eswikar, Abdul Majid Qasim Abdul al-Majid |
| author_sort |
Laeba, Muhammad |
| title |
الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل
= al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil
|
| title_short |
الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل
= al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil
|
| title_full |
الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل
= al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil
|
| title_fullStr |
الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل
= al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل
= al-Hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil
|
| title_sort |
الحدود بين التعبد والتعليل
= al-hudud baina al-taábbud wa-al-ta'lil |
| publisher |
International Islamic University Press |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/43132/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/43132/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/43132/1/%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%AF%D9%88%D8%AF_%D8%A8%D9%8A%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D8%A8%D8%AF_%D9%88%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AA%D8%B9%D9%84%D9%8A%D9%84.PDF |
| first_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:01:27Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:01:27Z |
| _version_ |
1777410651076952064 |