A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance

In the twenty first century the term ‘sustainability’ is recognized unanimously as an inherent and important strategy for an organization to operate and achieve long-term competitive edge. Accordingly sustainable key performance indicators (KPI) are identified by manufacturers and introduced for ado...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Khalili, Amjad, Ismail, Md Yusof, Karim, A.N. Mustafizul
Format:	Article
Language:	English English
Published:	Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN) 2016
Subjects:	T55.4 Industrial engineering.Management engineering.
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/3/arpn_comparative_evaluation.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/6/47063_A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20prevailing%20models_SCOPUS.pdf

id	iium-47063
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-470632017-03-17T07:18:25Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance Khalili, Amjad Ismail, Md Yusof Karim, A.N. Mustafizul T55.4 Industrial engineering.Management engineering. In the twenty first century the term ‘sustainability’ is recognized unanimously as an inherent and important strategy for an organization to operate and achieve long-term competitive edge. Accordingly sustainable key performance indicators (KPI) are identified by manufacturers and introduced for adoption and application in different operational activities. However, the dimensions of the sustainability models adopted by different enterprises are quite diverse as revealed through this investigation. The organizations are found to focus on varieties of strategic aspects rather than adopting identical or uniform strategies when dealing with sustainability issues. This paper aims at reviewing the various models prevailing in the contemporary research papers along with presentation of an in-depth analysis exposing the similar and dissimilar aspects. The contribution of this review is twofold: various models for sustainable performance (SP) are critically analyzed followed by a comparative evaluation with a view to proposing a general model suitable for adoption by manufacturing enterprises. The unified model as proposed in this paper comprises of three major components related to the social, financial and environmental domains. Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN) 2016-01 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/3/arpn_comparative_evaluation.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/6/47063_A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20prevailing%20models_SCOPUS.pdf Khalili, Amjad and Ismail, Md Yusof and Karim, A.N. Mustafizul (2016) A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11 (1). pp. 292-296. ISSN 1819-6608 http://www.arpnjournals.org/jeas/research_papers/rp_2016/jeas_0116_3334.pdf
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English English
topic	T55.4 Industrial engineering.Management engineering.
spellingShingle	T55.4 Industrial engineering.Management engineering. Khalili, Amjad Ismail, Md Yusof Karim, A.N. Mustafizul A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance
description	In the twenty first century the term ‘sustainability’ is recognized unanimously as an inherent and important strategy for an organization to operate and achieve long-term competitive edge. Accordingly sustainable key performance indicators (KPI) are identified by manufacturers and introduced for adoption and application in different operational activities. However, the dimensions of the sustainability models adopted by different enterprises are quite diverse as revealed through this investigation. The organizations are found to focus on varieties of strategic aspects rather than adopting identical or uniform strategies when dealing with sustainability issues. This paper aims at reviewing the various models prevailing in the contemporary research papers along with presentation of an in-depth analysis exposing the similar and dissimilar aspects. The contribution of this review is twofold: various models for sustainable performance (SP) are critically analyzed followed by a comparative evaluation with a view to proposing a general model suitable for adoption by manufacturing enterprises. The unified model as proposed in this paper comprises of three major components related to the social, financial and environmental domains.
format	Article
author	Khalili, Amjad Ismail, Md Yusof Karim, A.N. Mustafizul
author_facet	Khalili, Amjad Ismail, Md Yusof Karim, A.N. Mustafizul
author_sort	Khalili, Amjad
title	A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance
title_short	A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance
title_full	A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance
title_fullStr	A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance
title_full_unstemmed	A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance
title_sort	comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance
publisher	Asian Research Publishing Network (ARPN)
publishDate	2016
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/3/arpn_comparative_evaluation.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/47063/6/47063_A%20comparative%20evaluation%20of%20the%20prevailing%20models_SCOPUS.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T21:06:58Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T21:06:58Z
_version_	1777410998371614720

A comparative evaluation of the prevailing models for measuring sustainable performance

Similar Items