Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future
This article deals with the legal point of view of the dissenting opinion with reference to the recent Federal Court's split 3-2 ruling in Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor v Victoria Jayaseele Martin. The dissenting opinion which had subsequently changed the legal doctrine or p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
LexisNexis
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/7/52653-new.pdf |
| id |
iium-52653 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
eprints |
| spelling |
iium-526532016-11-23T07:51:22Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/ Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali K Law (General) This article deals with the legal point of view of the dissenting opinion with reference to the recent Federal Court's split 3-2 ruling in Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor v Victoria Jayaseele Martin. The dissenting opinion which had subsequently changed the legal doctrine or position is discussed with reference to the New Zealand Court of Appeal's decision in Brighouse Ltd v Bilderbeck. The minority decision in Brighouse Ltd's case was followed in Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin, a decision of the Court of Appeal comprising a panel of seven judges. LexisNexis 2016-07 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/7/52653-new.pdf Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali (2016) Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future. Malayan Law Journal, 2016 (4 (July-August)). lxxiii-lxxxiii. ISSN 0025-1283 |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Local University |
| institution |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
| building |
IIUM Repository |
| collection |
Online Access |
| language |
English |
| topic |
K Law (General) |
| spellingShingle |
K Law (General) Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| description |
This article deals with the legal point of view of the dissenting opinion with reference to the recent Federal Court's split 3-2 ruling in Majlis Agama Islam Wilayah Persekutuan & Anor v Victoria Jayaseele Martin. The dissenting opinion which had subsequently changed the legal doctrine or position is discussed with reference to the New Zealand Court of Appeal's decision in Brighouse Ltd v Bilderbeck. The minority decision in Brighouse Ltd's case was followed in Aoraki Corporation Ltd v McGavin, a decision of the Court of Appeal comprising a panel of seven judges. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali |
| author_facet |
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali |
| author_sort |
Ali Mohamed, Ashgar Ali |
| title |
Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_short |
Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_full |
Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_fullStr |
Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Dissenting opinion: The voice of the future |
| title_sort |
dissenting opinion: the voice of the future |
| publisher |
LexisNexis |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/52653/7/52653-new.pdf |
| first_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:14:34Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:14:34Z |
| _version_ |
1777411476420558848 |