Strengthening constitutional democracy through constitutional adjudication institutions: a comparative study between Indonesia and Australia
Democracy which gives power to the majority may lead to hegemony of majority which potentially threaten rights of the minority. In response to such threats some scholars have formulated a new paradigm of democracy called “constitutional democracy”. This article compares the experience of Indonesia a...
Main Authors: | Satriawan, Iwan, Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, Islami, Muhammad Nur, Farar, Salim |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/56505/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/56505/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/56505/1/56505_Strengthening%20Constitutional%20Democracy.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Constitutional democracy and constitutional adjudication: a comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2016) -
A comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2017) -
The diversity of constitutional adjudication and the universality of constitutional justice: common issues and challenges
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2018) -
Judicial activism and judicial restraint in the constitutional adjudication institution of Malaysia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin
Published: (2019) -
The role of the constitutional court in consolidating democracy in Indonesia: An evaluation after ten years
by: Satriawan, Iwan, et al.
Published: (2015)