Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable?
A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the relapse rate of anterior open bite (AOB) correction comparing Le Fort I osteotomy with and without anterior segmentation. The risk factors that might contribute to relapse were also assessed. Lateral cephalograms obtained at six different ti...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/1/Published%20AOB.pdf |
id |
iium-56641 |
---|---|
recordtype |
eprints |
spelling |
iium-566412017-11-05T17:44:00Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/ Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? Ismail, Izzati Nabilah Ismail Leung, Y.Y. RD Surgery RK Dentistry A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the relapse rate of anterior open bite (AOB) correction comparing Le Fort I osteotomy with and without anterior segmentation. The risk factors that might contribute to relapse were also assessed. Lateral cephalograms obtained at six different times were analyzed. A total of 81 patients with AOB were recruited. Thirty-five patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy without anterior segmentation and 46 patients underwent anterior segmentation. Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation resulted in significantly more AOB relapse when compared to that without anterior segmentation at 7 weeks postoperative (15.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.016). During the early postoperative period, factors that contributed to AOB relapse in Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation were AOB closure 4 mm and inferior positioning of the anterior segment >2 mm. Over the long term, AOB closure �4 mm and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy as the only mandibular procedure were factors identified as causing more AOB relapse in those treated by Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation. In conclusion, Le Fort I osteotomy without anterior segmentation was found to be more stable in the surgical correction of AOB in the early and late postoperative periods. Elsevier 2017-06 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/1/Published%20AOB.pdf Ismail, Izzati Nabilah Ismail and Leung, Y.Y. (2017) Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46 (6). pp. 766-773. ISSN 0901-5027 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0901502717313425 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.02.1275 |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Local University |
institution |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Repository |
collection |
Online Access |
language |
English |
topic |
RD Surgery RK Dentistry |
spellingShingle |
RD Surgery RK Dentistry Ismail, Izzati Nabilah Ismail Leung, Y.Y. Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? |
description |
A retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the relapse rate of anterior open bite (AOB) correction comparing Le Fort I osteotomy with and
without anterior segmentation. The risk factors that might contribute to relapse were also assessed. Lateral cephalograms obtained at six different times were analyzed. A total of 81 patients with AOB were recruited. Thirty-five patients underwent Le Fort I osteotomy without anterior segmentation and 46 patients underwent anterior segmentation. Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation resulted in significantly more AOB relapse when compared to that without anterior
segmentation at 7 weeks postoperative (15.2% vs. 0%, P = 0.016). During the early
postoperative period, factors that contributed to AOB relapse in Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation were AOB closure 4 mm and inferior positioning of the anterior segment >2 mm. Over the long term, AOB closure
�4 mm and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy as the only mandibular procedure were factors identified as causing more AOB relapse in those treated by Le Fort I osteotomy with anterior segmentation. In conclusion, Le Fort I osteotomy without anterior segmentation was found to be more stable in the surgical correction of AOB in the early and late postoperative periods. |
format |
Article |
author |
Ismail, Izzati Nabilah Ismail Leung, Y.Y. |
author_facet |
Ismail, Izzati Nabilah Ismail Leung, Y.Y. |
author_sort |
Ismail, Izzati Nabilah Ismail |
title |
Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? |
title_short |
Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? |
title_full |
Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? |
title_fullStr |
Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anterior open bite correction by Le Fort I osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? |
title_sort |
anterior open bite correction by le fort i osteotomy with or without anterior segmentation: which is more stable? |
publisher |
Elsevier |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/56641/1/Published%20AOB.pdf |
first_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:19:57Z |
last_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:19:57Z |
_version_ |
1777411814343049216 |