Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama

Since the number of intricate problems with regard to peace and security faced by mankind on our sphere has been greater than what they can bear, the survival of human race on earth becomes a significant priority to be contemplated. Despite hard work and continued effort rendered by many experts, th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	U Tun Aung, Maulana Akbar Shah, Ali, Mohammed Farid, Afridi, Muhammad Adil Khan
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	IIUM Press, International Islamic University Malaysia 2017
Subjects:	BJ1725 Ethics of social groups, classes, etc. Professional ethics BL Religion BP170.2 Benevolent work. Social work. Welfare work, etc BP173.5 Islam and world politics BP173.65 Islam and religious liberty BP188 Islamic religious life
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/57898/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/57898/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/57898/1/June%202017%20Agree%20to%20Disagree.pdf

id	iium-57898
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-578982018-01-12T10:27:13Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/57898/ Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama U Tun Aung, Maulana Akbar Shah Ali, Mohammed Farid Afridi, Muhammad Adil Khan BJ1725 Ethics of social groups, classes, etc. Professional ethics BL Religion BP170.2 Benevolent work. Social work. Welfare work, etc BP173.5 Islam and world politics BP173.65 Islam and religious liberty BP188 Islamic religious life Since the number of intricate problems with regard to peace and security faced by mankind on our sphere has been greater than what they can bear, the survival of human race on earth becomes a significant priority to be contemplated. Despite hard work and continued effort rendered by many experts, they face more serious issues and their resolutions are far from reality. It is because, in the author’s mind, rights and responsibilities are not properly observed. Particularly, in the area of religion people have lack of respecting the right of others and most of the times they are irresponsible. Every individual has their own choices according to their culture and belief which may not be acceptable to others. If every individual allows others to enjoy at their own choice while observing his own belief and tradition, we all can live in this world peacefully. This concept of living together with individual choice while respecting other’s choice may be called the concept of “agree to disagree” according to the author’s work. This ideology, which is yet to be well observed in our society, can surely replace violence with peaceful co-existence in the multi-religious and multi-cultural societies. Sejak masalah berkaitan dengan keharmonian dan keselamatan yang dialami manusia melebihi yang boleh ditanggung, kehidupan manusia di dunia ini menjadi satu keutamaan yang perlu dipertimbangkan. Walaupun banyak usaha dan langkah diambil oleh pihak pakar, mereka mengalami masalah lain yang lebih serius dan resolusi mereka adalah jauh dari matlamat. Ini kerana, dalam minda pengarang, hak dan tanggungjawab tidak diperhatikan dengan betul. Terutamanya dalam hal agama, orang kekurangan kehormatan terhadap hak orang lain dan kebanyakkannya adalah tidak bertanggungjawab. Setiap individu mempunyai kepercayaan dan hak masing-masing yang tidak boleh diterima oleh yang lain. Jika setiap individu membenarkan yang lain untuk mempunyai kepercayaan dan hak masing-masing, manusia semua boleh hidup dengan aman. Konsep ini boleh dipanggil sebagai konsep “setuju untuk tidak bersetuju” menurut kajian pengarang. Ideologi ini, yang masih belum diperhatikan dengan sepenuhnya dalam masyarakat kita, pasti boleh menggantikan keganasan dengan kehidupan aman bersama dalam masyarakat berbilang kaum dan budaya. IIUM Press, International Islamic University Malaysia 2017-06 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/57898/1/June%202017%20Agree%20to%20Disagree.pdf U Tun Aung, Maulana Akbar Shah and Ali, Mohammed Farid and Afridi, Muhammad Adil Khan (2017) Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama. Journal of Islam in Asia, 14 (1). pp. 248-267. ISSN 1823-0970 E-ISSN 2289-8077 http://10.101.244.45/jiasia/index.php/Islam/article/view/579
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	BJ1725 Ethics of social groups, classes, etc. Professional ethics BL Religion BP170.2 Benevolent work. Social work. Welfare work, etc BP173.5 Islam and world politics BP173.65 Islam and religious liberty BP188 Islamic religious life
spellingShingle	BJ1725 Ethics of social groups, classes, etc. Professional ethics BL Religion BP170.2 Benevolent work. Social work. Welfare work, etc BP173.5 Islam and world politics BP173.65 Islam and religious liberty BP188 Islamic religious life U Tun Aung, Maulana Akbar Shah Ali, Mohammed Farid Afridi, Muhammad Adil Khan Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama
description	Since the number of intricate problems with regard to peace and security faced by mankind on our sphere has been greater than what they can bear, the survival of human race on earth becomes a significant priority to be contemplated. Despite hard work and continued effort rendered by many experts, they face more serious issues and their resolutions are far from reality. It is because, in the author’s mind, rights and responsibilities are not properly observed. Particularly, in the area of religion people have lack of respecting the right of others and most of the times they are irresponsible. Every individual has their own choices according to their culture and belief which may not be acceptable to others. If every individual allows others to enjoy at their own choice while observing his own belief and tradition, we all can live in this world peacefully. This concept of living together with individual choice while respecting other’s choice may be called the concept of “agree to disagree” according to the author’s work. This ideology, which is yet to be well observed in our society, can surely replace violence with peaceful co-existence in the multi-religious and multi-cultural societies. Sejak masalah berkaitan dengan keharmonian dan keselamatan yang dialami manusia melebihi yang boleh ditanggung, kehidupan manusia di dunia ini menjadi satu keutamaan yang perlu dipertimbangkan. Walaupun banyak usaha dan langkah diambil oleh pihak pakar, mereka mengalami masalah lain yang lebih serius dan resolusi mereka adalah jauh dari matlamat. Ini kerana, dalam minda pengarang, hak dan tanggungjawab tidak diperhatikan dengan betul. Terutamanya dalam hal agama, orang kekurangan kehormatan terhadap hak orang lain dan kebanyakkannya adalah tidak bertanggungjawab. Setiap individu mempunyai kepercayaan dan hak masing-masing yang tidak boleh diterima oleh yang lain. Jika setiap individu membenarkan yang lain untuk mempunyai kepercayaan dan hak masing-masing, manusia semua boleh hidup dengan aman. Konsep ini boleh dipanggil sebagai konsep “setuju untuk tidak bersetuju” menurut kajian pengarang. Ideologi ini, yang masih belum diperhatikan dengan sepenuhnya dalam masyarakat kita, pasti boleh menggantikan keganasan dengan kehidupan aman bersama dalam masyarakat berbilang kaum dan budaya.
format	Article
author	U Tun Aung, Maulana Akbar Shah Ali, Mohammed Farid Afridi, Muhammad Adil Khan
author_facet	U Tun Aung, Maulana Akbar Shah Ali, Mohammed Farid Afridi, Muhammad Adil Khan
author_sort	U Tun Aung, Maulana Akbar Shah
title	Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama
title_short	Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama
title_full	Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama
title_fullStr	Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama
title_full_unstemmed	Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama
title_sort	agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama
publisher	IIUM Press, International Islamic University Malaysia
publishDate	2017
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/57898/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/57898/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/57898/1/June%202017%20Agree%20to%20Disagree.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T21:21:51Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T21:21:51Z
_version_	1777411934805557248

Agree to disagree: towards a peaceful co-existence amongst multi-religious community = Setuju untuk tidak bersetuju: kearah kehidupan aman bersama dikalangan masyarakat berbilang agama

Similar Items