The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population

Background: AIMS65 is a score designed to predict in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs of gastrointestinal bleeding. Objectives: Our aims were to evaluate the performance of the AIMS65 compared with Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) in predicting in-patient mortality, and the secondary o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri, Jaafar, Khairul Azhar, Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish
Format:	Monograph
Language:	English English
Published:	2017
Subjects:	R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/1/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/2/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc

id	iium-58630
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-586302018-02-03T09:05:17Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/ The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Jaafar, Khairul Azhar Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine Background: AIMS65 is a score designed to predict in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs of gastrointestinal bleeding. Objectives: Our aims were to evaluate the performance of the AIMS65 compared with Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) in predicting in-patient mortality, and the secondary outcomes include composite clinical endpoint of intensive care unit (ICU) admission; timing of endoscopy; re-endoscopy; blood transfusion and length of hospital stay. Methodology: The study was successful in recruiting 103 patients. Clinical and biochemical data, transfusion requirements, endoscopic treatment and its timing, and outcomes for 3 months after admission were collected. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital, re-endoscopy, blood transfusions, and length of stay. Findings: In receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses, AIMS65 was significantly better in predicting inpatient mortality compared with GBS (0.196 vs 0.464). In fact, AIMS65 showed a statistically significant association with mortality for patients with AUGIB (P=0.012). AIMS65 and GBS were identical in predicting ICU (0.600 vs 0.533), timing of endoscopy (0.428 vs 0.458), re-endoscopy (0.407 vs 0.537), blood transfusion (0.694 vs 0.667) and length of hospital stay (0.600 vs 0.350). Conclusion: AIMS65 is a better score predicting mortality compared with GBS. AIMS65 is comparable to GBS in essential endpoints such as the need for ICU admission, timing of endoscopy, re-endoscopic intervention, blood transfusion and length of hospital stay. 2017-08 Monograph NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/1/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/2/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri and Jaafar, Khairul Azhar and Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish (2017) The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population. Research Report. UNSPECIFIED. (Unpublished)
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English English
topic	R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine
spellingShingle	R Medicine (General) RC Internal medicine Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Jaafar, Khairul Azhar Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population
description	Background: AIMS65 is a score designed to predict in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and costs of gastrointestinal bleeding. Objectives: Our aims were to evaluate the performance of the AIMS65 compared with Glasgow Blatchford score (GBS) in predicting in-patient mortality, and the secondary outcomes include composite clinical endpoint of intensive care unit (ICU) admission; timing of endoscopy; re-endoscopy; blood transfusion and length of hospital stay. Methodology: The study was successful in recruiting 103 patients. Clinical and biochemical data, transfusion requirements, endoscopic treatment and its timing, and outcomes for 3 months after admission were collected. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital, re-endoscopy, blood transfusions, and length of stay. Findings: In receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses, AIMS65 was significantly better in predicting inpatient mortality compared with GBS (0.196 vs 0.464). In fact, AIMS65 showed a statistically significant association with mortality for patients with AUGIB (P=0.012). AIMS65 and GBS were identical in predicting ICU (0.600 vs 0.533), timing of endoscopy (0.428 vs 0.458), re-endoscopy (0.407 vs 0.537), blood transfusion (0.694 vs 0.667) and length of hospital stay (0.600 vs 0.350). Conclusion: AIMS65 is a better score predicting mortality compared with GBS. AIMS65 is comparable to GBS in essential endpoints such as the need for ICU admission, timing of endoscopy, re-endoscopic intervention, blood transfusion and length of hospital stay.
format	Monograph
author	Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Jaafar, Khairul Azhar Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish
author_facet	Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri Jaafar, Khairul Azhar Mohd Firdaus, Mohd Al-Baqlish
author_sort	Hasmoni, Mohamed Hadzri
title	The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population
title_short	The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population
title_full	The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population
title_fullStr	The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population
title_full_unstemmed	The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population
title_sort	comparison between glasgow blatchford score and aims65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for asian population
publishDate	2017
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/1/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc http://irep.iium.edu.my/58630/2/Final%20result%20AIMS65%20study_RMC_IREP.doc
first_indexed	2023-09-18T21:22:57Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T21:22:57Z
_version_	1777412003168518144

The comparison between Glasgow Blatchford score and AIMS65 score in predicting outcome in upper gastrointestinal bleeding for Asian population

Similar Items