Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia

The present study provides new empirical evidence of bank stability measures for 50 banks in Malaysia, for a period from 1999 to 2015. There are two methods of measuring bank stability that is using Z-score and CAMELS variables. After calculating, these variables are ranked, with the highest average...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Abdul Karim, Norzitah, Syed Jaafar Alhabshi, Syed Musa, Kassim, Salina, Haron, Razali
Format:	Conference or Workshop Item
Language:	English
Published:	Springer 2018
Subjects:	HG3368 Islamic Banking and Finance
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/59998/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/59998/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/59998/1/59998_Measuring%20bank%20stability.pdf

id	iium-59998
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-599982018-06-26T03:56:21Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/59998/ Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia Abdul Karim, Norzitah Syed Jaafar Alhabshi, Syed Musa Kassim, Salina Haron, Razali HG3368 Islamic Banking and Finance The present study provides new empirical evidence of bank stability measures for 50 banks in Malaysia, for a period from 1999 to 2015. There are two methods of measuring bank stability that is using Z-score and CAMELS variables. After calculating, these variables are ranked, with the highest average is ranked as one, and the lowest average is ranked last, or fifty. This is following the method by (Roman and Procedia Economics and Finance, 6(13), 703–712 Roman and Şargu 2013) and (Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1530–1545 Dincer et al. 2011) and extending it by introducing the average of total ranking for all variables. The empirical findings suggest that both local Islamic and conventional banks are ranked favourable in overall average bank stability score, sensitivity to market risk, asset quality, earning and profitability, but local conventional banks are recorded favourable ranking in liquidity. Comparing the two types of local banks, conventional banks are ranked better in liquidity, sensitivity to market risk and earning and profitability. Springer 2018-01-01 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/59998/1/59998_Measuring%20bank%20stability.pdf Abdul Karim, Norzitah and Syed Jaafar Alhabshi, Syed Musa and Kassim, Salina and Haron, Razali (2018) Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia. In: 2nd Advances in Business Research International Conference (ABRIC 2016), 16th-17th Nov. 2016, Kedah, Malaysia. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-10-6053-3#about
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	HG3368 Islamic Banking and Finance
spellingShingle	HG3368 Islamic Banking and Finance Abdul Karim, Norzitah Syed Jaafar Alhabshi, Syed Musa Kassim, Salina Haron, Razali Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia
description	The present study provides new empirical evidence of bank stability measures for 50 banks in Malaysia, for a period from 1999 to 2015. There are two methods of measuring bank stability that is using Z-score and CAMELS variables. After calculating, these variables are ranked, with the highest average is ranked as one, and the lowest average is ranked last, or fifty. This is following the method by (Roman and Procedia Economics and Finance, 6(13), 703–712 Roman and Şargu 2013) and (Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 1530–1545 Dincer et al. 2011) and extending it by introducing the average of total ranking for all variables. The empirical findings suggest that both local Islamic and conventional banks are ranked favourable in overall average bank stability score, sensitivity to market risk, asset quality, earning and profitability, but local conventional banks are recorded favourable ranking in liquidity. Comparing the two types of local banks, conventional banks are ranked better in liquidity, sensitivity to market risk and earning and profitability.
format	Conference or Workshop Item
author	Abdul Karim, Norzitah Syed Jaafar Alhabshi, Syed Musa Kassim, Salina Haron, Razali
author_facet	Abdul Karim, Norzitah Syed Jaafar Alhabshi, Syed Musa Kassim, Salina Haron, Razali
author_sort	Abdul Karim, Norzitah
title	Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia
title_short	Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia
title_full	Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia
title_fullStr	Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed	Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia
title_sort	measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between islamic and conventional banks in malaysia
publisher	Springer
publishDate	2018
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/59998/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/59998/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/59998/1/59998_Measuring%20bank%20stability.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T21:25:02Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T21:25:02Z
_version_	1777412134903218176

Measuring bank stability: a comparative analysis between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia

Similar Items