The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye

Introduction: The clinical evaluation of the three layers of tear film is still poorly described. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye. Materials and method: Schirmer test with anaesthesia (STA) and tear meniscus height (TMH) measurement w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ithnin, Mohd. Hafidz, Ariffin, Azrin Esmady, Mohd. Kamal, Khairidzan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/60172/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/60172/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/60172/1/The%20Value%20of%20Aqueous%20Assessment%20in%20Diagnosing%20Dry%20Eye.pdf
id iium-60172
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-601722017-12-15T03:10:21Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/60172/ The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye Ithnin, Mohd. Hafidz Ariffin, Azrin Esmady Mohd. Kamal, Khairidzan RE Ophthalmology Introduction: The clinical evaluation of the three layers of tear film is still poorly described. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye. Materials and method: Schirmer test with anaesthesia (STA) and tear meniscus height (TMH) measurement were conducted on non-dry eye (NDE) and dry eye (DE) subjects in this cross-sectional study. The NDE and DE subjects were classified using two types of classification; classification 1 and classification 2. Results: 321 subjects with 642 eyes were recruited in the study. STA was significantly correlated with TMH (r = 0.24, p < 0.001) in all 642 eyes. The comparison between non-dry and dry eye subjects in STA and TMH were not significantly different (p > 0.05) if the Classification 1 was used to define dry eye. In Classification 2, there were significantly different between NDE (12.5 ± 8.2 mm) and DE (3.4 ± 0.8 mm) subjects in STA (p < 0.001). Similar trend was also depicted in TMH based on the definition of dry eye stated in Classification 2 (NDE = 0.45 ± 0.20 mm, DE = 0.39 ± 0.14 mm; p < 0.05). Conclusion: The value of STA and TMH were lower significantly in dry eye subjects. However, the significant outcomes were only demonstrated if the clinical signs of dryness were used in the definition of dry eye. Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia 2017-08-10 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/60172/1/The%20Value%20of%20Aqueous%20Assessment%20in%20Diagnosing%20Dry%20Eye.pdf Ithnin, Mohd. Hafidz and Ariffin, Azrin Esmady and Mohd. Kamal, Khairidzan (2017) The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye. The International Medical Journal Malaysia (IMJM), 16 (supp. 1). p. 14. E-ISSN 1823-4631 http://iiumedic.net/imjm/v1/download/Volume%2016%20No%201%20Supp%201/Abstract-Book-for-IMJM-final-v2-20.pdf
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic RE Ophthalmology
spellingShingle RE Ophthalmology
Ithnin, Mohd. Hafidz
Ariffin, Azrin Esmady
Mohd. Kamal, Khairidzan
The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye
description Introduction: The clinical evaluation of the three layers of tear film is still poorly described. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye. Materials and method: Schirmer test with anaesthesia (STA) and tear meniscus height (TMH) measurement were conducted on non-dry eye (NDE) and dry eye (DE) subjects in this cross-sectional study. The NDE and DE subjects were classified using two types of classification; classification 1 and classification 2. Results: 321 subjects with 642 eyes were recruited in the study. STA was significantly correlated with TMH (r = 0.24, p < 0.001) in all 642 eyes. The comparison between non-dry and dry eye subjects in STA and TMH were not significantly different (p > 0.05) if the Classification 1 was used to define dry eye. In Classification 2, there were significantly different between NDE (12.5 ± 8.2 mm) and DE (3.4 ± 0.8 mm) subjects in STA (p < 0.001). Similar trend was also depicted in TMH based on the definition of dry eye stated in Classification 2 (NDE = 0.45 ± 0.20 mm, DE = 0.39 ± 0.14 mm; p < 0.05). Conclusion: The value of STA and TMH were lower significantly in dry eye subjects. However, the significant outcomes were only demonstrated if the clinical signs of dryness were used in the definition of dry eye.
format Article
author Ithnin, Mohd. Hafidz
Ariffin, Azrin Esmady
Mohd. Kamal, Khairidzan
author_facet Ithnin, Mohd. Hafidz
Ariffin, Azrin Esmady
Mohd. Kamal, Khairidzan
author_sort Ithnin, Mohd. Hafidz
title The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye
title_short The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye
title_full The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye
title_fullStr The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye
title_full_unstemmed The value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye
title_sort value of aqueous assessment in diagnosing dry eye
publisher Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia
publishDate 2017
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/60172/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/60172/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/60172/1/The%20Value%20of%20Aqueous%20Assessment%20in%20Diagnosing%20Dry%20Eye.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:25:17Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:25:17Z
_version_ 1777412150845767680