The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study

According to Jurjani, the relationship between syntax and semantics has not been effectively clarified within the framework of traditional Arabic grammatical theory. In his commentary (see Jurjani, Dalā’il al-I’jāz, 1960, p.66-67) he differentiated between ‘meaning’ and ‘form’ in a sentence. This co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
Format: Book Chapter
Language:English
Published: IIUM Press 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/6929/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/6929/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/6929/1/Chapter_2.pdf
id iium-6929
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-69292012-07-30T01:05:34Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/6929/ The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah B720 Medieval BC Logic D051 Ancient History P Philology. Linguistics PJ6690 Ancient Arabic According to Jurjani, the relationship between syntax and semantics has not been effectively clarified within the framework of traditional Arabic grammatical theory. In his commentary (see Jurjani, Dalā’il al-I’jāz, 1960, p.66-67) he differentiated between ‘meaning’ and ‘form’ in a sentence. This concept is presented not to linguists but theologians (Mu`tazilah) in impressing on them the need to study not only theology but also grammar and literary theory in order to improve their understanding of the inimitability of the Qur’an. In this case, the concept of nazm combines three aspects which are: 1) lafz hāmil, 2) makna bihi qāim and 3) rabat lahuma nāzim. This contribution showed the intellectual capacity of Jurjani, particularly when he argued that one could not have the right meaning if not constructed with lafz and rabat in order to produce a nazm. In other words, for those who have reached the level of eloquence (fasāhah) will not produce a coherent sentence unless they combine the group of words according to their concurrence followed by the meaning. Starting from here, we know that he focused more on the system of nazm and movement among the words after their combination. This means that eloquence does not depend on single words and producing coherent meaning. His major contribution to the discussion of unimitability (i’jāz) of the Qur’an was on ma`ānī (meanings) and lafz (expression). Both concepts have been subject to debate between logicians and grammarians. According to the logicians, meanings were logical ideas signified by expressions, while the grammarians concentrated on the functions of the words. IIUM Press 2011 Book Chapter PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/6929/1/Chapter_2.pdf Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah (2011) The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study. In: Paradigm shift on thought: Muslim women's perspectives. IIUM Press, Kuala Lumpur, pp. 23-40. ISBN 9789674181796 http://rms.research.iium.edu.my/bookstore/default.aspx
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic B720 Medieval
BC Logic
D051 Ancient History
P Philology. Linguistics
PJ6690 Ancient Arabic
spellingShingle B720 Medieval
BC Logic
D051 Ancient History
P Philology. Linguistics
PJ6690 Ancient Arabic
Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study
description According to Jurjani, the relationship between syntax and semantics has not been effectively clarified within the framework of traditional Arabic grammatical theory. In his commentary (see Jurjani, Dalā’il al-I’jāz, 1960, p.66-67) he differentiated between ‘meaning’ and ‘form’ in a sentence. This concept is presented not to linguists but theologians (Mu`tazilah) in impressing on them the need to study not only theology but also grammar and literary theory in order to improve their understanding of the inimitability of the Qur’an. In this case, the concept of nazm combines three aspects which are: 1) lafz hāmil, 2) makna bihi qāim and 3) rabat lahuma nāzim. This contribution showed the intellectual capacity of Jurjani, particularly when he argued that one could not have the right meaning if not constructed with lafz and rabat in order to produce a nazm. In other words, for those who have reached the level of eloquence (fasāhah) will not produce a coherent sentence unless they combine the group of words according to their concurrence followed by the meaning. Starting from here, we know that he focused more on the system of nazm and movement among the words after their combination. This means that eloquence does not depend on single words and producing coherent meaning. His major contribution to the discussion of unimitability (i’jāz) of the Qur’an was on ma`ānī (meanings) and lafz (expression). Both concepts have been subject to debate between logicians and grammarians. According to the logicians, meanings were logical ideas signified by expressions, while the grammarians concentrated on the functions of the words.
format Book Chapter
author Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
author_facet Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
author_sort Yaacob, Solehah@Nik Najah Fadilah
title The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study
title_short The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study
title_full The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study
title_fullStr The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study
title_full_unstemmed The expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study
title_sort expression of meaning as a logical approach in the case of semantic study
publisher IIUM Press
publishDate 2011
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/6929/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/6929/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/6929/1/Chapter_2.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T20:16:05Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T20:16:05Z
_version_ 1777407797081669632