Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method

Introduction: Total knee replacement (TKR) is considered one of most successful treatment in treating knee arthritis. It aims at restoring neutral mechanical axis, balanced ligaments and normal Q angle. Surgeons have been using manual jig to achieved perfect implant placement. Since 2002 computer as...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hashim, Ahmad Munir, Noor Rahin, Mohd Shahidan, Zulkifly, Ahmad Hafiz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/70968/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70968/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70968/1/70968_Comparison%20of%20functional%20outcome%20between%20computer.pdf
id iium-70968
recordtype eprints
spelling iium-709682019-03-11T03:17:30Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/70968/ Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method Hashim, Ahmad Munir Noor Rahin, Mohd Shahidan Zulkifly, Ahmad Hafiz RD701 Orthopedics Introduction: Total knee replacement (TKR) is considered one of most successful treatment in treating knee arthritis. It aims at restoring neutral mechanical axis, balanced ligaments and normal Q angle. Surgeons have been using manual jig to achieved perfect implant placement. Since 2002 computer assisted surgery (CAS) is gaining popularity in TKR surgery to improved accuracy of implant placement. In a large meta-analysis by Bauwen’s et al, computer assisted surgery reduced number of patients with post-operative malalignment >3 degree. In another study by Kim et al found there was no difference in alignment between computer assisted and conventional method TKR in bilateral TKR with one using conventional and the other computer assisted. In our study we compared the functional outcome between these two methods. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Penang General Hospital comparing the functional outcome using SF-36 questionnaire and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring. It involved 35 knees in each arm. All patients were operated by single surgeon using same type of implant and navigation system. Patients with post-operative complications were excluded. Results: We found that there was no significant difference (p<0.05) in both SF-36 and HSS knee score using U Mann Whitney test. Conclusion: There was no difference in functional outcome between conventional TKR and CAS Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia 2018-12-24 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/70968/1/70968_Comparison%20of%20functional%20outcome%20between%20computer.pdf Hashim, Ahmad Munir and Noor Rahin, Mohd Shahidan and Zulkifly, Ahmad Hafiz (2018) Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method. The International Medical Journal Malaysia, 17 (Supplementary Issue 1). p. 68. ISSN 1823-4631 http://iiumedic.net/imjm/v1/download/vol_17_no_3_supp_1/MRS2018-69.pdf
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Local University
institution International Islamic University Malaysia
building IIUM Repository
collection Online Access
language English
topic RD701 Orthopedics
spellingShingle RD701 Orthopedics
Hashim, Ahmad Munir
Noor Rahin, Mohd Shahidan
Zulkifly, Ahmad Hafiz
Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method
description Introduction: Total knee replacement (TKR) is considered one of most successful treatment in treating knee arthritis. It aims at restoring neutral mechanical axis, balanced ligaments and normal Q angle. Surgeons have been using manual jig to achieved perfect implant placement. Since 2002 computer assisted surgery (CAS) is gaining popularity in TKR surgery to improved accuracy of implant placement. In a large meta-analysis by Bauwen’s et al, computer assisted surgery reduced number of patients with post-operative malalignment >3 degree. In another study by Kim et al found there was no difference in alignment between computer assisted and conventional method TKR in bilateral TKR with one using conventional and the other computer assisted. In our study we compared the functional outcome between these two methods. Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Penang General Hospital comparing the functional outcome using SF-36 questionnaire and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scoring. It involved 35 knees in each arm. All patients were operated by single surgeon using same type of implant and navigation system. Patients with post-operative complications were excluded. Results: We found that there was no significant difference (p<0.05) in both SF-36 and HSS knee score using U Mann Whitney test. Conclusion: There was no difference in functional outcome between conventional TKR and CAS
format Article
author Hashim, Ahmad Munir
Noor Rahin, Mohd Shahidan
Zulkifly, Ahmad Hafiz
author_facet Hashim, Ahmad Munir
Noor Rahin, Mohd Shahidan
Zulkifly, Ahmad Hafiz
author_sort Hashim, Ahmad Munir
title Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method
title_short Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method
title_full Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method
title_fullStr Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method
title_sort comparison of functional outcome between computer navigated total knee replacement with conventional method
publisher Kulliyyah of Medicine, International Islamic University Malaysia
publishDate 2018
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/70968/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70968/
http://irep.iium.edu.my/70968/1/70968_Comparison%20of%20functional%20outcome%20between%20computer.pdf
first_indexed 2023-09-18T21:40:43Z
last_indexed 2023-09-18T21:40:43Z
_version_ 1777413121875378176