Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource and relationship matter?
The study, conducted in Malaysia, examined the role of recipient–allocator relationship in perceived choice of resource allocation norms (equity, equality, and need) on two types of resources (money and favour) and the degree to which they were considered fair. Subjects responded to vignettes th...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English English |
| Published: |
SpringerLink
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/1/71710_Fairness%20in%20Allocation%20Decisions.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/7/71710%20Fairness%20in%20Allocation%20Decisions%20SCOPUS.pdf |
| id |
iium-71710 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
eprints |
| spelling |
iium-717102019-11-17T17:23:05Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/ Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource and relationship matter? Hassan, Arif Ahmed, Mohammad HF5001 Business. Business Administration HF5548.7 Industrial psychology HM1001 Social psychology The study, conducted in Malaysia, examined the role of recipient–allocator relationship in perceived choice of resource allocation norms (equity, equality, and need) on two types of resources (money and favour) and the degree to which they were considered fair. Subjects responded to vignettes that described a resource to be allocated by an allocator between a needy and a meritorious employee. Recipients relationship status in the vignettes indicated that one of the two was the brother of the allocator who was either meritorious or needy. In the control group, no relationship characteristic of the recipient was stated. Results indicated that equality was the fairest and preferred norm of justice. No significant difference was obtained among the perceived norm and fairness in all but one situation distribution of loan). The results are discussed in relation to the subjects’ cognitive strategy and collectivistic values. SpringerLink 2019-04 Article PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/1/71710_Fairness%20in%20Allocation%20Decisions.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/7/71710%20Fairness%20in%20Allocation%20Decisions%20SCOPUS.pdf Hassan, Arif and Ahmed, Mohammad (2019) Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource and relationship matter? Psychological Studies, 64 (1). pp. 103-109. ISSN 0033-2968 E-ISSN 0974-9861 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12646-019-00480-8 10.1007/s12646-019-00480-8 |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Local University |
| institution |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
| building |
IIUM Repository |
| collection |
Online Access |
| language |
English English |
| topic |
HF5001 Business. Business Administration HF5548.7 Industrial psychology HM1001 Social psychology |
| spellingShingle |
HF5001 Business. Business Administration HF5548.7 Industrial psychology HM1001 Social psychology Hassan, Arif Ahmed, Mohammad Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource and relationship matter? |
| description |
The study, conducted in Malaysia, examined the role of recipient–allocator relationship in perceived choice
of resource allocation norms (equity, equality, and need) on
two types of resources (money and favour) and the degree
to which they were considered fair. Subjects responded to
vignettes that described a resource to be allocated by an
allocator between a needy and a meritorious employee.
Recipients relationship status in the vignettes indicated that one of the two was the brother of the allocator who was
either meritorious or needy. In the control group, no relationship characteristic of the recipient was stated. Results indicated that equality was the fairest and preferred norm of justice. No significant difference was obtained among the perceived norm and fairness in all but one situation distribution of loan). The results are discussed in relation to the subjects’ cognitive strategy and collectivistic values. |
| format |
Article |
| author |
Hassan, Arif Ahmed, Mohammad |
| author_facet |
Hassan, Arif Ahmed, Mohammad |
| author_sort |
Hassan, Arif |
| title |
Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource
and relationship matter? |
| title_short |
Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource
and relationship matter? |
| title_full |
Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource
and relationship matter? |
| title_fullStr |
Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource
and relationship matter? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource
and relationship matter? |
| title_sort |
fairness in allocation decisions: does type of resource
and relationship matter? |
| publisher |
SpringerLink |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/1/71710_Fairness%20in%20Allocation%20Decisions.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/71710/7/71710%20Fairness%20in%20Allocation%20Decisions%20SCOPUS.pdf |
| first_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:41:41Z |
| last_indexed |
2023-09-18T21:41:41Z |
| _version_ |
1777413182166401024 |