Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility

This study attempts to discuss and examine whether SharÊÑah courts can adopt these common law tests or not. This study used two methods of data collection: library research and opinion survey among the forensic staff of Hospital Kula Lumpur and SharÊÑah experts. This study has reached to a number of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Shalim, K. M. Zakir Hossain Shalim, Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah
Format:	Book
Language:	English
Published:	IIUM Press, International Islamic University Malaysia 2017
Subjects:	K Law (General) KBP Islamic Law KBP1 Islamic law.Shariah.Fiqh KBP425 Uṣūl al-fiqh. Jurisprudence and theory of law. Science of legal reasoning.
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/73854/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/73854/1/73854_Forensic%20evidence%20an%20analysis%20of%20shari%27ah%20tests%20of%20admissibility.pdf

id	iium-73854
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-738542019-10-08T03:56:57Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/73854/ Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility Shalim, K. M. Zakir Hossain Shalim Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah K Law (General) KBP Islamic Law KBP1 Islamic law.Shariah.Fiqh KBP425 Uṣūl al-fiqh. Jurisprudence and theory of law. Science of legal reasoning. This study attempts to discuss and examine whether SharÊÑah courts can adopt these common law tests or not. This study used two methods of data collection: library research and opinion survey among the forensic staff of Hospital Kula Lumpur and SharÊÑah experts. This study has reached to a number of findings. The most important among them are: this study proves that common law criteria for forensic evidence are acceptable in admitting forensic evidences in Islamic law as they are justified either by SharÊÑah texts or other standards of evidence in Islamic law; in determining the reliability of science, common law is silent whether the data has been properly collected from the crime scene and preserved; and whether the conclusion given by the expert is correct. Additionally, this study finds that for qualifications of an expert, common law requires knowledge, experiences and training but does not require justness and number of the experts. IIUM Press, International Islamic University Malaysia 2017 Book NonPeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/73854/1/73854_Forensic%20evidence%20an%20analysis%20of%20shari%27ah%20tests%20of%20admissibility.pdf Shalim, K. M. Zakir Hossain Shalim and Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah (2017) Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility. IIUM Press, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. ISBN 978-967-418-557-2
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	K Law (General) KBP Islamic Law KBP1 Islamic law.Shariah.Fiqh KBP425 Uṣūl al-fiqh. Jurisprudence and theory of law. Science of legal reasoning.
spellingShingle	K Law (General) KBP Islamic Law KBP1 Islamic law.Shariah.Fiqh KBP425 Uṣūl al-fiqh. Jurisprudence and theory of law. Science of legal reasoning. Shalim, K. M. Zakir Hossain Shalim Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility
description	This study attempts to discuss and examine whether SharÊÑah courts can adopt these common law tests or not. This study used two methods of data collection: library research and opinion survey among the forensic staff of Hospital Kula Lumpur and SharÊÑah experts. This study has reached to a number of findings. The most important among them are: this study proves that common law criteria for forensic evidence are acceptable in admitting forensic evidences in Islamic law as they are justified either by SharÊÑah texts or other standards of evidence in Islamic law; in determining the reliability of science, common law is silent whether the data has been properly collected from the crime scene and preserved; and whether the conclusion given by the expert is correct. Additionally, this study finds that for qualifications of an expert, common law requires knowledge, experiences and training but does not require justness and number of the experts.
format	Book
author	Shalim, K. M. Zakir Hossain Shalim Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah
author_facet	Shalim, K. M. Zakir Hossain Shalim Haneef, Sayed Sikandar Shah
author_sort	Shalim, K. M. Zakir Hossain Shalim
title	Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility
title_short	Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility
title_full	Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility
title_fullStr	Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility
title_full_unstemmed	Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility
title_sort	forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility
publisher	IIUM Press, International Islamic University Malaysia
publishDate	2017
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/73854/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/73854/1/73854_Forensic%20evidence%20an%20analysis%20of%20shari%27ah%20tests%20of%20admissibility.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T21:44:43Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T21:44:43Z
_version_	1777413372991504384

Forensic evidence an analysis of shari'ah tests of admissibility

Similar Items