Judicial activism and judicial restraint in the constitutional adjudication institution of Malaysia
Justices of Malaysian’s courts have the constitutional role of upholding the Federal Constitution, rule of law and safeguarding human rights. In dispensing justice, the judges have shown their creativity in dealing with cases of intrusion by the executive and legislature and their willingness to exp...
Main Author: | Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English English English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/78523/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/78523/1/I%20October%20Symposium%201%20program.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/78523/4/Judicial%20Activism.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/78523/2/Law%20and%20Justice%20in%20Malaysia_%202020%20and%20Beyond%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Symposium.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Dynamic federalism for Sarawak: issues and challenges
by: Abang Bolhil, Abang Ikhbal, et al.
Published: (2019) -
An assessment of the objectives of decentralization in Aceh autonomous region
by: Razi, Muhammad, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Constitutional democracy and constitutional adjudication: a comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2016) -
A comparison of constitutional adjudication institutions in Malaysia and Indonesia
by: Mokhtar, Khairil Azmin, et al.
Published: (2017) -
‘Asabiyyah & ‘Umran in Ibn Khaldun’s thought
by: Syed Jaafar, Syed Hamid Albar, et al.
Published: (2019)