The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia

The LAW of EVIDENCE is termed as the eyes of the law. It is one essential legal tools that govern the aspect of proof that will determine whether certain kind of evidence tendered before the court is relevant, admissible otherwise. This is very important in order to have a fair trial and to establis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors:	Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail
Format:	Book
Language:	English
Published:	Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia 2006
Subjects:	K Law (General) KPG Malaysia
Online Access:	http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/1/2006_-_The_reception_of_the_law_relating_to_Res_Gestae_in_Malaysia.pdf

id	iium-7968
recordtype	eprints
spelling	iium-79682014-10-21T01:23:10Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/ The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia K Law (General) KPG Malaysia The LAW of EVIDENCE is termed as the eyes of the law. It is one essential legal tools that govern the aspect of proof that will determine whether certain kind of evidence tendered before the court is relevant, admissible otherwise. This is very important in order to have a fair trial and to establish justice. This research will analyses whether the doctrine of Res Gestae (a common law legal concept) which literally means "the thing done", a transaction or essential circumstances surrounding facts which are so closely connected to the fact in issue. Legally, it means circumstances, which are spontaneous and contemporaneous, or unplanned incidents of a particular litigated act, is relevant and thus admissible fact under the Malaysian Law. In most cases appear before the court of law, there is a fact story behind each of such cases, and each fact story contains several acts, omissions and statements. When evidence is given of such acts omissions and statements, although they are not in issue, but are capable of throwing some light upon the nature of transactions, revealing its true quality and character which may constitute a relevant fact. Such acts omissions and statements are regarded, as part of the same transaction and the bottom line issue here is that whether such facts are allowed to be proved? If yes, to what extent does the admissibility apply? If no, what is the different approach taken by the Malaysian Courts compared to the Common Law principle? Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail 2006 Book PeerReviewed application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/1/2006_-_The_reception_of_the_law_relating_to_Res_Gestae_in_Malaysia.pdf Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail, ed. (2006) The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia. Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. ISBN 983-2957-74-5
repository_type	Digital Repository
institution_category	Local University
institution	International Islamic University Malaysia
building	IIUM Repository
collection	Online Access
language	English
topic	K Law (General) KPG Malaysia
spellingShingle	K Law (General) KPG Malaysia The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
description	The LAW of EVIDENCE is termed as the eyes of the law. It is one essential legal tools that govern the aspect of proof that will determine whether certain kind of evidence tendered before the court is relevant, admissible otherwise. This is very important in order to have a fair trial and to establish justice. This research will analyses whether the doctrine of Res Gestae (a common law legal concept) which literally means "the thing done", a transaction or essential circumstances surrounding facts which are so closely connected to the fact in issue. Legally, it means circumstances, which are spontaneous and contemporaneous, or unplanned incidents of a particular litigated act, is relevant and thus admissible fact under the Malaysian Law. In most cases appear before the court of law, there is a fact story behind each of such cases, and each fact story contains several acts, omissions and statements. When evidence is given of such acts omissions and statements, although they are not in issue, but are capable of throwing some light upon the nature of transactions, revealing its true quality and character which may constitute a relevant fact. Such acts omissions and statements are regarded, as part of the same transaction and the bottom line issue here is that whether such facts are allowed to be proved? If yes, to what extent does the admissibility apply? If no, what is the different approach taken by the Malaysian Courts compared to the Common Law principle?
author2	Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail
author_facet	Mohamad Yunus, Mohamad Ismail
format	Book
title	The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_short	The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_full	The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_fullStr	The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed	The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia
title_sort	reception of the law relating to res gestae in malaysia
publisher	Research Centre, International Islamic University Malaysia
publishDate	2006
url	http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/ http://irep.iium.edu.my/7968/1/2006_-_The_reception_of_the_law_relating_to_Res_Gestae_in_Malaysia.pdf
first_indexed	2023-09-18T20:17:31Z
last_indexed	2023-09-18T20:17:31Z
_version_	1777407887029567488

The reception of the law relating to Res Gestae in Malaysia

Similar Items