The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System
Performance measurement, monitoring, and evaluation have long been part of the infrastructure within the federal government in Canada. With more than 30 years of formalized evaluation experience in most large federal departments and agencies, many...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Brief |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/06/14767163/canadian-monitoring-evaluation-system http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11062 |
id |
okr-10986-11062 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-110622021-04-23T14:02:53Z The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System Lahey, Robert ACCOUNTABILITIES ACCOUNTABILITY ACTION PLANS AUDITOR AUDITS CAPACITY BUILDING CAPACITY · BUILDING CERTIFICATE E DEVELOPMENT ENABLING ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION PRACTICES EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EXTERNAL CONSULTANTS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FLEXIBILITY GENERAL PUBLIC GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT POLICIES GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SHARING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE LAWS LEADERSHIP LEARNING M& E CAPACITY M& E INITIATIVES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MEDIA MINISTER MINISTERS MONITORS NETWORKING NETWORKS PERFORMANCE MONITORING POLITICIAN POVERTY REDUCTION PRIVATE SECTOR PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC FUNDS RESULT SANCTIONS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL EXPERTS TECHNICAL ISSUES TECHNICAL SKILLS TECHNICAL TRAINING TRANSFER PAYMENTS TRANSPARENCY USERS USES WEB WEB SITE WEB SITES Performance measurement, monitoring, and evaluation have long been part of the infrastructure within the federal government in Canada. With more than 30 years of formalized evaluation experience in most large federal departments and agencies, many lessons can be gained, not the least of which is the recognition that the monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system itself is not static. The Canadian government has a formalized evaluation policy, standards, and guidelines; and these have been modified on three occasions over the past three decades. Changes have usually come about because of a public sector reform initiative such as the introduction of a results orientation to government management, a political issue that may have generated a demand for greater accountability and transparency in government, or a change in emphasis on where and how M&E information should be used in government. This chapter provides an overview of the Canadian M&E model, examining its defining elements and identifying key lessons learned. 2012-08-13T14:01:52Z 2012-08-13T14:01:52Z 2011-06 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/06/14767163/canadian-monitoring-evaluation-system http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11062 English PREM Notes and Special Series on the Nuts and Bolts of Government M&E Systems; No. 11 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Brief Publications & Research Canada |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English |
topic |
ACCOUNTABILITIES ACCOUNTABILITY ACTION PLANS AUDITOR AUDITS CAPACITY BUILDING CAPACITY · BUILDING CERTIFICATE E DEVELOPMENT ENABLING ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION PRACTICES EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EXTERNAL CONSULTANTS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FLEXIBILITY GENERAL PUBLIC GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT POLICIES GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SHARING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE LAWS LEADERSHIP LEARNING M& E CAPACITY M& E INITIATIVES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MEDIA MINISTER MINISTERS MONITORS NETWORKING NETWORKS PERFORMANCE MONITORING POLITICIAN POVERTY REDUCTION PRIVATE SECTOR PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC FUNDS RESULT SANCTIONS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL EXPERTS TECHNICAL ISSUES TECHNICAL SKILLS TECHNICAL TRAINING TRANSFER PAYMENTS TRANSPARENCY USERS USES WEB WEB SITE WEB SITES |
spellingShingle |
ACCOUNTABILITIES ACCOUNTABILITY ACTION PLANS AUDITOR AUDITS CAPACITY BUILDING CAPACITY · BUILDING CERTIFICATE E DEVELOPMENT ENABLING ENVIRONMENT EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION PRACTICES EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EXTERNAL CONSULTANTS FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FLEXIBILITY GENERAL PUBLIC GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT POLICIES GOVERNMENT REQUIREMENTS HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY HUMAN RESOURCES INFORMATION SHARING INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE LAWS LEADERSHIP LEARNING M& E CAPACITY M& E INITIATIVES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MEDIA MINISTER MINISTERS MONITORS NETWORKING NETWORKS PERFORMANCE MONITORING POLITICIAN POVERTY REDUCTION PRIVATE SECTOR PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PUBLIC FUNDS RESULT SANCTIONS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT TECHNICAL EXPERTS TECHNICAL ISSUES TECHNICAL SKILLS TECHNICAL TRAINING TRANSFER PAYMENTS TRANSPARENCY USERS USES WEB WEB SITE WEB SITES Lahey, Robert The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System |
geographic_facet |
Canada |
relation |
PREM Notes and Special Series on the Nuts and Bolts of Government M&E Systems; No. 11 |
description |
Performance measurement, monitoring, and
evaluation have long been part of the infrastructure within
the federal government in Canada. With more than 30 years of
formalized evaluation experience in most large federal
departments and agencies, many lessons can be gained, not
the least of which is the recognition that the monitoring
and evaluation (M&E) system itself is not static. The
Canadian government has a formalized evaluation policy,
standards, and guidelines; and these have been modified on
three occasions over the past three decades. Changes have
usually come about because of a public sector reform
initiative such as the introduction of a results orientation
to government management, a political issue that may have
generated a demand for greater accountability and
transparency in government, or a change in emphasis on where
and how M&E information should be used in government.
This chapter provides an overview of the Canadian M&E
model, examining its defining elements and identifying key
lessons learned. |
format |
Publications & Research :: Brief |
author |
Lahey, Robert |
author_facet |
Lahey, Robert |
author_sort |
Lahey, Robert |
title |
The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System |
title_short |
The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System |
title_full |
The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System |
title_fullStr |
The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Canadian Monitoring and Evaluation System |
title_sort |
canadian monitoring and evaluation system |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/06/14767163/canadian-monitoring-evaluation-system http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11062 |
_version_ |
1764415383175954432 |