Nigeria - Strategic Conflict Assessment : Methodology, Key Findings and Lessons Learnt
The need to support a Strategic Conflict Assessment (SCA) was agreed by donors in December 2001, and supported by President Obasanjo. The central guiding principle was that the SCA process should be led by the national Institute for Peace and Confl...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Brief |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/05/2637045/nigeria-strategic-conflict-assessment-methodology-key-findings-lessons-learnt-nigeria-strategic-conflict-assessment-methodology-key-findings-lessons-leanrt http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11300 |
id |
okr-10986-11300 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-113002021-04-23T14:02:54Z Nigeria - Strategic Conflict Assessment : Methodology, Key Findings and Lessons Learnt Lyons, Sarah Reinermann, Dirk CONFLICT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY DICTATORSHIP POLITICAL VALUE JUDGMENTS SOCIAL VALUES STAKEHOLDERS OWNERSHIP CAPACITY BUILDING FINANCIAL SUPPORT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DONOR PARTICIPATION POLICY OBJECTIVES TRAINING CIVIL SOCIETY NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS PRIVATE SECTOR MEDIA ARMED CONFLICT ARMS CAUSES OF CONFLICT CHILD SOLDIERS CIVIL CONFLICT CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COMMUNITIES CONFLICT CONFLICT COUNTRIES CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICT RISK CONFLICTS CORRUPTION CREDIBILITY DEMOBILIZATION DEMOCRACY ELECTIONS FIELDWORK INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INTERNATIONAL DONORS INTERVIEWS JOURNALISTS LEADERSHIP LISTENING LOCAL CAPACITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT MILLION PEOPLE PEACE PEACEMAKING POST-CONFLICT REBEL ORGANIZATIONS RECONSTRUCTION RELIGIOUS DIVISIONS SELF- INTEREST SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL VALUES SOCIALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STAKEHOLDER STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP STAKEHOLDERS TRANSPARENCY URBAN AREAS VIOLENCE VIOLENT CONFLICT WEAPONS The need to support a Strategic Conflict Assessment (SCA) was agreed by donors in December 2001, and supported by President Obasanjo. The central guiding principle was that the SCA process should be led by the national Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (IPCR), in the Presidency. Local ownership and capacity building were considered key to achieving credibility and sustainability. Technical and financial support was provided to IPCR and local stakeholders by some of Nigeria's major international donors: DFID; UNDP; USAID; and the World Bank, who formed an SCA Advisory Group to IPCR. The Advisory Group proved to be a vital structure for collective decision-making. This approach was chosen over the more traditional single-donor approach to draw upon a wide range of international expertise and experience, to share resource costs and to mitigate political risk to donors. Donor cooperation and collaboration meant that donors were able to cover areas where partners may not have had the capacity or mandate. This was the first time, globally, that a national conflict assessment had ever been supported by a group of donors. Conflict assessments by individual donors are often not shared beyond the sponsoring donor. Where they are shared, they are often edited to remove "sensitive" parts, thus defeating the purpose of the analysis and making it difficult for stakeholders and other donors to benefit. 2012-08-13T14:41:47Z 2012-08-13T14:41:47Z 2003-05 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/05/2637045/nigeria-strategic-conflict-assessment-methodology-key-findings-lessons-learnt-nigeria-strategic-conflict-assessment-methodology-key-findings-lessons-leanrt http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11300 English Social Development Notes; No. 11 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Brief Publications & Research Africa Nigeria |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English |
topic |
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY DICTATORSHIP POLITICAL VALUE JUDGMENTS SOCIAL VALUES STAKEHOLDERS OWNERSHIP CAPACITY BUILDING FINANCIAL SUPPORT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DONOR PARTICIPATION POLICY OBJECTIVES TRAINING CIVIL SOCIETY NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS PRIVATE SECTOR MEDIA ARMED CONFLICT ARMS CAUSES OF CONFLICT CHILD SOLDIERS CIVIL CONFLICT CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COMMUNITIES CONFLICT CONFLICT COUNTRIES CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICT RISK CONFLICTS CORRUPTION CREDIBILITY DEMOBILIZATION DEMOCRACY ELECTIONS FIELDWORK INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INTERNATIONAL DONORS INTERVIEWS JOURNALISTS LEADERSHIP LISTENING LOCAL CAPACITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT MILLION PEOPLE PEACE PEACEMAKING POST-CONFLICT REBEL ORGANIZATIONS RECONSTRUCTION RELIGIOUS DIVISIONS SELF- INTEREST SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL VALUES SOCIALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STAKEHOLDER STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP STAKEHOLDERS TRANSPARENCY URBAN AREAS VIOLENCE VIOLENT CONFLICT WEAPONS |
spellingShingle |
CONFLICT MANAGEMENT METHODOLOGY DICTATORSHIP POLITICAL VALUE JUDGMENTS SOCIAL VALUES STAKEHOLDERS OWNERSHIP CAPACITY BUILDING FINANCIAL SUPPORT TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE DECISION MAKING PROCESSES DONOR PARTICIPATION POLICY OBJECTIVES TRAINING CIVIL SOCIETY NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION ACADEMIC INSTITUTIONS PRIVATE SECTOR MEDIA ARMED CONFLICT ARMS CAUSES OF CONFLICT CHILD SOLDIERS CIVIL CONFLICT CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY COLLABORATION COMMUNITIES CONFLICT CONFLICT COUNTRIES CONFLICT MANAGEMENT CONFLICT PREVENTION CONFLICT RESOLUTION CONFLICT RISK CONFLICTS CORRUPTION CREDIBILITY DEMOBILIZATION DEMOCRACY ELECTIONS FIELDWORK INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INTERNATIONAL DONORS INTERVIEWS JOURNALISTS LEADERSHIP LISTENING LOCAL CAPACITY LOCAL GOVERNMENT MILLION PEOPLE PEACE PEACEMAKING POST-CONFLICT REBEL ORGANIZATIONS RECONSTRUCTION RELIGIOUS DIVISIONS SELF- INTEREST SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL VALUES SOCIALLY SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STAKEHOLDER STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP STAKEHOLDERS TRANSPARENCY URBAN AREAS VIOLENCE VIOLENT CONFLICT WEAPONS Lyons, Sarah Reinermann, Dirk Nigeria - Strategic Conflict Assessment : Methodology, Key Findings and Lessons Learnt |
geographic_facet |
Africa Nigeria |
relation |
Social Development Notes; No. 11 |
description |
The need to support a Strategic Conflict
Assessment (SCA) was agreed by donors in December 2001, and
supported by President Obasanjo. The central guiding
principle was that the SCA process should be led by the
national Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution (IPCR),
in the Presidency. Local ownership and capacity building
were considered key to achieving credibility and
sustainability. Technical and financial support was provided
to IPCR and local stakeholders by some of Nigeria's
major international donors: DFID; UNDP; USAID; and the World
Bank, who formed an SCA Advisory Group to IPCR. The Advisory
Group proved to be a vital structure for collective
decision-making. This approach was chosen over the more
traditional single-donor approach to draw upon a wide range
of international expertise and experience, to share resource
costs and to mitigate political risk to donors. Donor
cooperation and collaboration meant that donors were able to
cover areas where partners may not have had the capacity or
mandate. This was the first time, globally, that a national
conflict assessment had ever been supported by a group of
donors. Conflict assessments by individual donors are often
not shared beyond the sponsoring donor. Where they are
shared, they are often edited to remove
"sensitive" parts, thus defeating the purpose of
the analysis and making it difficult for stakeholders and
other donors to benefit. |
format |
Publications & Research :: Brief |
author |
Lyons, Sarah Reinermann, Dirk |
author_facet |
Lyons, Sarah Reinermann, Dirk |
author_sort |
Lyons, Sarah |
title |
Nigeria - Strategic Conflict Assessment : Methodology, Key Findings and Lessons Learnt |
title_short |
Nigeria - Strategic Conflict Assessment : Methodology, Key Findings and Lessons Learnt |
title_full |
Nigeria - Strategic Conflict Assessment : Methodology, Key Findings and Lessons Learnt |
title_fullStr |
Nigeria - Strategic Conflict Assessment : Methodology, Key Findings and Lessons Learnt |
title_full_unstemmed |
Nigeria - Strategic Conflict Assessment : Methodology, Key Findings and Lessons Learnt |
title_sort |
nigeria - strategic conflict assessment : methodology, key findings and lessons learnt |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/05/2637045/nigeria-strategic-conflict-assessment-methodology-key-findings-lessons-learnt-nigeria-strategic-conflict-assessment-methodology-key-findings-lessons-leanrt http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11300 |
_version_ |
1764416237900660736 |