Access to Justice : The English Experience with Small Claims

The note reviews England's experience on the potential of small claims procedures in expanding access to justice, which allow legal redress in situations where formal litigation would be too costly. But, while these procedures offer access to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Baldwin, John
Format: Brief
Language:English
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2000/05/828316/access-justice-english-experience-small-claims
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11433
id okr-10986-11433
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-114332021-06-14T11:02:14Z Access to Justice : The English Experience with Small Claims Baldwin, John ACCESS TO JUSTICE ASSURANCE CIVIL ACTIONS CIVIL COURTS CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM CIVIL LITIGATION COURT DECISIONS COURT PROCEDURES COURT PROCEEDINGS COURTS INFLATION INTEGRITY JUDGES LAWYERS LEGAL DISPUTES LEGAL INSTITUTIONS LEGAL REPRESENTATION LITIGATION SMALL CLAIMS COURTS TRIALS WITNESSES PUBLIC SECTOR CLAIMS LEGAL RECOURSE LITIGATION DISPUTE RESOLUTION ACCESS TO JUSTICE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS LEGAL ADVISORS INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS LAW ENFORCEMENT CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS The note reviews England's experience on the potential of small claims procedures in expanding access to justice, which allow legal redress in situations where formal litigation would be too costly. But, while these procedures offer access to justice, they also illustrate the difficulties that informal dispute resolution mechanisms can pose. Advantages of small claims procedures reveal that most lay litigants favor informal hearings over formal courts processes, losing parties are not required to pay the costs of the winning parties, and, by and large, judges seem to be willing, and able to adapt to the informality of small claims hearings. Difficulties however address the inadequacies of preliminary legal advice in the absence of relevant evidence, or witnesses, as well as the wide variations in judges' approaches, who expressed different attitudes in the application of ordinary law in small claims. Moreover, both the undefined role of lawyers in informal hearings, and ineffective enforcement of judgments remain unclear, and problematic. It is suggested that if greater access to justice is the objective, the key is to design a civil justice system that provides costs, and procedures, realistically, and proportionately to the issue in dispute. 2012-08-13T15:03:29Z 2012-08-13T15:03:29Z 2000-05 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2000/05/828316/access-justice-english-experience-small-claims http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11433 English PREM Notes; No. 40 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Brief Publications & Research Europe and Central Asia United Kingdom
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
topic ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ASSURANCE
CIVIL ACTIONS
CIVIL COURTS
CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM
CIVIL LITIGATION
COURT DECISIONS
COURT PROCEDURES
COURT PROCEEDINGS
COURTS
INFLATION
INTEGRITY
JUDGES
LAWYERS
LEGAL DISPUTES
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
LEGAL REPRESENTATION
LITIGATION
SMALL CLAIMS COURTS
TRIALS
WITNESSES PUBLIC SECTOR
CLAIMS
LEGAL RECOURSE
LITIGATION
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
SMALL CLAIMS COURTS
LEGAL ADVISORS
INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS
LAW ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS
spellingShingle ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ASSURANCE
CIVIL ACTIONS
CIVIL COURTS
CIVIL JUSTICE SYSTEM
CIVIL LITIGATION
COURT DECISIONS
COURT PROCEDURES
COURT PROCEEDINGS
COURTS
INFLATION
INTEGRITY
JUDGES
LAWYERS
LEGAL DISPUTES
LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
LEGAL REPRESENTATION
LITIGATION
SMALL CLAIMS COURTS
TRIALS
WITNESSES PUBLIC SECTOR
CLAIMS
LEGAL RECOURSE
LITIGATION
DISPUTE RESOLUTION
ACCESS TO JUSTICE
SMALL CLAIMS COURTS
LEGAL ADVISORS
INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS
LAW ENFORCEMENT
CIVIL LAW SYSTEMS
Baldwin, John
Access to Justice : The English Experience with Small Claims
geographic_facet Europe and Central Asia
United Kingdom
relation PREM Notes; No. 40
description The note reviews England's experience on the potential of small claims procedures in expanding access to justice, which allow legal redress in situations where formal litigation would be too costly. But, while these procedures offer access to justice, they also illustrate the difficulties that informal dispute resolution mechanisms can pose. Advantages of small claims procedures reveal that most lay litigants favor informal hearings over formal courts processes, losing parties are not required to pay the costs of the winning parties, and, by and large, judges seem to be willing, and able to adapt to the informality of small claims hearings. Difficulties however address the inadequacies of preliminary legal advice in the absence of relevant evidence, or witnesses, as well as the wide variations in judges' approaches, who expressed different attitudes in the application of ordinary law in small claims. Moreover, both the undefined role of lawyers in informal hearings, and ineffective enforcement of judgments remain unclear, and problematic. It is suggested that if greater access to justice is the objective, the key is to design a civil justice system that provides costs, and procedures, realistically, and proportionately to the issue in dispute.
format Publications & Research :: Brief
author Baldwin, John
author_facet Baldwin, John
author_sort Baldwin, John
title Access to Justice : The English Experience with Small Claims
title_short Access to Justice : The English Experience with Small Claims
title_full Access to Justice : The English Experience with Small Claims
title_fullStr Access to Justice : The English Experience with Small Claims
title_full_unstemmed Access to Justice : The English Experience with Small Claims
title_sort access to justice : the english experience with small claims
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2012
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2000/05/828316/access-justice-english-experience-small-claims
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11433
_version_ 1764416714540318720