End of the Line for the Local Loop Monopoly? Technology, Competition, and Investment in Telecom Networks
Local telephone service is the last bastion of a still frequently asserted public policy preference for monopoly provision of telecommunications. This Note challenges the rationale for that preference, addressing four issues: First, is local networ...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Viewpoint |
Language: | English |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2012
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1995/12/441235/end-line-local-loop-monopoly-technology-competition-investment-telecom-networks http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11641 |
id |
okr-10986-11641 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-116412021-06-14T11:04:41Z End of the Line for the Local Loop Monopoly? Technology, Competition, and Investment in Telecom Networks Smith, Peter AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS BER CELLULAR OPERATORS CELLULAR RADIO FOREIGN INVESTORS INNOVATIONS MONOPOLY MOV POLICY ENVIRONMENT RADIO RETAINED EARNINGS TELECOM TELECOMMUNICATIONS TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR TELEPHONE TELEPHONE NUMBERS TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONY TEXT UNIVERSAL SERVICE TELEPHONE NETWORKS COSTS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS DENATIONALIZATION GOVERNMENT POLICY MONOPOLIES MARKET COMPETITION LOCAL TELEPHONE NETWORKS TELECOMMUNICATIONS Local telephone service is the last bastion of a still frequently asserted public policy preference for monopoly provision of telecommunications. This Note challenges the rationale for that preference, addressing four issues: First, is local network competition feasible from a technical and cost point of view? Second, is telecommunications competition accepted by major investors? Third, how important is competition from a public policy point of view? And fourth, how can it be made to work? This Note makes the case that local network competition is increasingly feasible from a technical and cost point of view, that it is increasingly accepted by investors, and that it offers important benefits from a public policy point of view. But in order to work, it must be supported by effective regulation. Policymakers should be encouraged to address the critical issues of this transition toward a competitive telecommunications sector. 2012-08-13T15:36:39Z 2012-08-13T15:36:39Z 1995-12 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1995/12/441235/end-line-local-loop-monopoly-technology-competition-investment-telecom-networks Viewpoint. -- note no. 63 (December 1995) http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11641 English Viewpoint CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Viewpoint Publications & Research |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English |
topic |
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS BER CELLULAR OPERATORS CELLULAR RADIO FOREIGN INVESTORS INNOVATIONS MONOPOLY MOV POLICY ENVIRONMENT RADIO RETAINED EARNINGS TELECOM TELECOMMUNICATIONS TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR TELEPHONE TELEPHONE NUMBERS TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONY TEXT UNIVERSAL SERVICE TELEPHONE NETWORKS COSTS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS DENATIONALIZATION GOVERNMENT POLICY MONOPOLIES MARKET COMPETITION LOCAL TELEPHONE NETWORKS TELECOMMUNICATIONS |
spellingShingle |
AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS BER CELLULAR OPERATORS CELLULAR RADIO FOREIGN INVESTORS INNOVATIONS MONOPOLY MOV POLICY ENVIRONMENT RADIO RETAINED EARNINGS TELECOM TELECOMMUNICATIONS TELECOMMUNICATIONS INFRASTRUCTURE TELECOMMUNICATIONS POLICY TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR TELEPHONE TELEPHONE NUMBERS TELEPHONE SERVICE TELEPHONY TEXT UNIVERSAL SERVICE TELEPHONE NETWORKS COSTS TECHNOLOGY INVESTMENTS DENATIONALIZATION GOVERNMENT POLICY MONOPOLIES MARKET COMPETITION LOCAL TELEPHONE NETWORKS TELECOMMUNICATIONS Smith, Peter End of the Line for the Local Loop Monopoly? Technology, Competition, and Investment in Telecom Networks |
relation |
Viewpoint |
description |
Local telephone service is the last
bastion of a still frequently asserted public policy
preference for monopoly provision of telecommunications.
This Note challenges the rationale for that preference,
addressing four issues: First, is local network competition
feasible from a technical and cost point of view? Second, is
telecommunications competition accepted by major investors?
Third, how important is competition from a public policy
point of view? And fourth, how can it be made to work? This
Note makes the case that local network competition is
increasingly feasible from a technical and cost point of
view, that it is increasingly accepted by investors, and
that it offers important benefits from a public policy point
of view. But in order to work, it must be supported by
effective regulation. Policymakers should be encouraged to
address the critical issues of this transition toward a
competitive telecommunications sector. |
format |
Publications & Research :: Viewpoint |
author |
Smith, Peter |
author_facet |
Smith, Peter |
author_sort |
Smith, Peter |
title |
End of the Line for the Local Loop Monopoly? Technology, Competition, and Investment in Telecom Networks |
title_short |
End of the Line for the Local Loop Monopoly? Technology, Competition, and Investment in Telecom Networks |
title_full |
End of the Line for the Local Loop Monopoly? Technology, Competition, and Investment in Telecom Networks |
title_fullStr |
End of the Line for the Local Loop Monopoly? Technology, Competition, and Investment in Telecom Networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
End of the Line for the Local Loop Monopoly? Technology, Competition, and Investment in Telecom Networks |
title_sort |
end of the line for the local loop monopoly? technology, competition, and investment in telecom networks |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2012 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1995/12/441235/end-line-local-loop-monopoly-technology-competition-investment-telecom-networks http://hdl.handle.net/10986/11641 |
_version_ |
1764417473101168640 |