Financial Inclusion and the Linkages to Stability, Integrity and Protection : Insights from the South African Experience
International Standard-Setting Bodies (SSBs) and national policy makers-including financial regulators-pursue the core objectives of financial stability, financial integrity and financial consumer protection. These advances challenge financial regu...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/11/17385987/financial-inclusion-linkages-stability-integrity-protection-insights-south-african-experience http://hdl.handle.net/10986/13095 |
Summary: | International Standard-Setting Bodies
(SSBs) and national policy makers-including financial
regulators-pursue the core objectives of financial
stability, financial integrity and financial consumer
protection. These advances challenge financial regulators to
consider how to optimize the linkages among the four
distinct policy objectives financial inclusion, financial
stability, financial integrity, and financial consumer
protection. There is good reason to believe that, at the
level of outcomes, ISIP objectives may be mutually
reinforcing and interdependent: no long term stability
without inclusion, for example, and vice versa. In practice,
at the policy level, the linkages are less well known and
policy makers face choices that are unnecessarily framed as
tradeoffs. This report introduces and develops the concept
that a proportionate approach to any financial inclusion
measure (and specifically to its regulatory and supervisory
design and implementation) should seek to optimize the ISIP
linkages: maximizing synergies and minimizing tradeoffs and
other negative outcomes. In South Africa, the four ISIP
objectives are also the four pillars of national financial
sector policy; and financial inclusion in various forms has
been a key objective for the postapartheid period. The study
sought to understand in each case: 1) whether the ISIP
linkages were considered at the time of the intervention; 2)
what was done to mitigate potential ISIP risks; and 3) as
far as the available data allowed, what linkages have been
manifest to-date. |
---|