The Challenge of Reducing Subsidies and Trade Barriers
This is one of 10 studies for the Copenhagen Consensus Project that sought to evaluate the most feasible opportunities to improve welfare globally and alleviate poverty in developing countries. The author argues that phasing out distortionary gover...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, D.C.
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/09/5175017/challenge-reducing-subsidies-trade-barriers http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14250 |
Summary: | This is one of 10 studies for the
Copenhagen Consensus Project that sought to evaluate the
most feasible opportunities to improve welfare globally and
alleviate poverty in developing countries. The author argues
that phasing out distortionary government subsidies and
barriers to international trade will yield an
extraordinarily high benefit-cost ratio. A survey is
provided of recent estimates using global economy-wide
simulation models of the benefits of doing that by way of
the current Doha round of multilateral trade negotiations.
Even if adjustment costs are several times as large as
suggested by available estimates, the benefit-cost ratio
from seizing this opportunity exceeds 20. That is much
higher than the rewards from regional or bilateral trade
agreements or from providing preferential access for
least-developed countries' exports to high-income
countries. Such reform would simultaneously contribute to
alleviating several of the other key challenges reflected in
the United Nation's Millennium Development Goals. |
---|