Brazil : Country Procurement Assessment Report
This Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR) intends to contribute to a dialogue with the government, on its procurement policy and management agenda, by surveying the existing situation, assessing the situation in light of appropriate standar...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Country Procurement Assessment (CPAR) |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/03/3575914/brazil-country-procurement-assessment-report http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14590 |
id |
okr-10986-14590 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
spelling |
okr-10986-145902021-04-23T14:03:17Z Brazil : Country Procurement Assessment Report World Bank PROCUREMENT PROCUREMENT PLANS BIDDING PROCESS BIDDING DOCUMENTS INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE INTERNET DISPUTE RESOLUTION CONTRACT LAW CONTRACT FORMULATION LAW ENFORCEMENT COURT ADMINISTRATION INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK REFORM POLICY ACCOUNTABILITY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM ANTI-CORRUPTION AUTHORITY CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY COMPLAINTS CONSENSUS CONSTITUTION CORRUPTION COURTS DECENTRALIZATION DECISION MAKING DECREE DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION ENACTMENT ETHICS EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE FEDERAL AGENCIES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAUDULENT PRACTICES GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT ENTITIES GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS INSTITUTIONALIZATION LAW ENFORCEMENT LAWS LEGAL AUTHORITY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL PROVISIONS LEGISLATION MEDIA MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS PRESIDENCY PROCUREMENT POLICIES PROFESSIONALS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC AGENCIES PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PUBLIC POLICY PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVES SOCIAL SECTOR SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY This Country Procurement Assessment Report (CPAR) intends to contribute to a dialogue with the government, on its procurement policy and management agenda, by surveying the existing situation, assessing the situation in light of appropriate standards, indicating a meaningful array of issues that could be incorporated into the government's agenda, and examining the desirability, and workability of practices that would address those issues. It represents an effort by the Bank, to seek further ways to support the reform, and modernization of government procurement in Brazil. Notwithstanding the constraining environment imposed by the 1993 legislation, the country moved forward to modern practices, developing an Internet-based system to implement the electronic version of COMPRASNET, unanimously rated satisfactory. Nonetheless, the current legal framework lays no foundation for a dispute resolution system for government contracts, where exhaustively detailed legal provisions, discourage flexible interpretations, and allow the disqualification of proposals for reasons that are not substantial. In addition, there is lack of a normative entity, i.e., a policy-making agency responsible for developing procurement norms, and ensuring standardization of documents and procedures, thus leaving a gap in the procurement function, filled at times by the legal departments of the agencies, by the Federal Secretariat of Internal Control, and the Courts of Accounts, or by other law enforcement units, that are not specialized in government procurement. Recommendations include the establishment of a normative entity, the development of standard bidding documents, the introduction of Web-based planning, dispute resolution, and bulk buying, and, creating within the new procurement law, an effective dispute resolution system for contract implementation. 2013-07-25T15:41:08Z 2013-07-25T15:41:08Z 2004-03 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/03/3575914/brazil-country-procurement-assessment-report http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14590 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Country Procurement Assessment (CPAR) Economic & Sector Work Latin America & Caribbean Brazil |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
PROCUREMENT PROCUREMENT PLANS BIDDING PROCESS BIDDING DOCUMENTS INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE INTERNET DISPUTE RESOLUTION CONTRACT LAW CONTRACT FORMULATION LAW ENFORCEMENT COURT ADMINISTRATION INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK REFORM POLICY ACCOUNTABILITY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM ANTI-CORRUPTION AUTHORITY CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY COMPLAINTS CONSENSUS CONSTITUTION CORRUPTION COURTS DECENTRALIZATION DECISION MAKING DECREE DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION ENACTMENT ETHICS EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE FEDERAL AGENCIES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAUDULENT PRACTICES GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT ENTITIES GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS INSTITUTIONALIZATION LAW ENFORCEMENT LAWS LEGAL AUTHORITY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL PROVISIONS LEGISLATION MEDIA MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS PRESIDENCY PROCUREMENT POLICIES PROFESSIONALS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC AGENCIES PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PUBLIC POLICY PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVES SOCIAL SECTOR SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY |
spellingShingle |
PROCUREMENT PROCUREMENT PLANS BIDDING PROCESS BIDDING DOCUMENTS INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE INTERNET DISPUTE RESOLUTION CONTRACT LAW CONTRACT FORMULATION LAW ENFORCEMENT COURT ADMINISTRATION INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL & REGULATORY FRAMEWORK REFORM POLICY ACCOUNTABILITY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM ANTI-CORRUPTION AUTHORITY CIVIL SERVICE CIVIL SOCIETY COMPLAINTS CONSENSUS CONSTITUTION CORRUPTION COURTS DECENTRALIZATION DECISION MAKING DECREE DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTIONS DISPUTE RESOLUTION ENACTMENT ETHICS EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT EXPENDITURE FEDERAL AGENCIES FEDERAL GOVERNMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FRAUDULENT PRACTICES GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT ENTITIES GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS IMPLEMENTING AGENCIES INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS INSTITUTIONALIZATION LAW ENFORCEMENT LAWS LEGAL AUTHORITY LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL PROVISIONS LEGISLATION MEDIA MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS PRESIDENCY PROCUREMENT POLICIES PROFESSIONALS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC AGENCIES PUBLIC INVESTMENT PUBLIC MANAGEMENT PUBLIC POLICY PUBLIC PROCUREMENT PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR MANAGEMENT REPRESENTATIVES SOCIAL SECTOR SUBNATIONAL GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY World Bank Brazil : Country Procurement Assessment Report |
geographic_facet |
Latin America & Caribbean Brazil |
description |
This Country Procurement Assessment
Report (CPAR) intends to contribute to a dialogue with the
government, on its procurement policy and management agenda,
by surveying the existing situation, assessing the situation
in light of appropriate standards, indicating a meaningful
array of issues that could be incorporated into the
government's agenda, and examining the desirability,
and workability of practices that would address those
issues. It represents an effort by the Bank, to seek further
ways to support the reform, and modernization of government
procurement in Brazil. Notwithstanding the constraining
environment imposed by the 1993 legislation, the country
moved forward to modern practices, developing an
Internet-based system to implement the electronic version of
COMPRASNET, unanimously rated satisfactory. Nonetheless, the
current legal framework lays no foundation for a dispute
resolution system for government contracts, where
exhaustively detailed legal provisions, discourage flexible
interpretations, and allow the disqualification of proposals
for reasons that are not substantial. In addition, there is
lack of a normative entity, i.e., a policy-making agency
responsible for developing procurement norms, and ensuring
standardization of documents and procedures, thus leaving a
gap in the procurement function, filled at times by the
legal departments of the agencies, by the Federal
Secretariat of Internal Control, and the Courts of Accounts,
or by other law enforcement units, that are not specialized
in government procurement. Recommendations include the
establishment of a normative entity, the development of
standard bidding documents, the introduction of Web-based
planning, dispute resolution, and bulk buying, and, creating
within the new procurement law, an effective dispute
resolution system for contract implementation. |
format |
Economic & Sector Work :: Country Procurement Assessment (CPAR) |
author |
World Bank |
author_facet |
World Bank |
author_sort |
World Bank |
title |
Brazil : Country Procurement Assessment Report |
title_short |
Brazil : Country Procurement Assessment Report |
title_full |
Brazil : Country Procurement Assessment Report |
title_fullStr |
Brazil : Country Procurement Assessment Report |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brazil : Country Procurement Assessment Report |
title_sort |
brazil : country procurement assessment report |
publisher |
Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/03/3575914/brazil-country-procurement-assessment-report http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14590 |
_version_ |
1764428548408344576 |