Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment

This Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) was prepared on the basis of the findings of a World Bank mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2001, and reflects developments through early 2002. The CFAA was a constituent element of the Pub...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: World Bank
Format: Country Financial Accountability Assessment
Language:English
en_US
Published: Washington, DC 2013
Subjects:
EBF
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/06/2821384/bosnia-herzegovina-country-financial-accountability-assessment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14690
id okr-10986-14690
recordtype oai_dc
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic PUBLIC FINANCE
POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION
TRANSITIONAL ECONOMIES
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL PLANNING
GOVERNMENT PLANNING
BUDGET PROCESS
BUDGETARY SUPPORT
BUDGET CONTROL
RISK ASSESSMENT
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
AUDITING
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
CAPACITY BUILDING
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
INVESTMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
FISCAL CONSTRAINTS
CONSENSUS APPROACH
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
REFORM POLICY
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPABILITY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
POLITICAL POWER
CORRUPT PRACTICES
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM ACCOUNT
ACCOUNTABILITY
ACCOUNTANCY
ACCOUNTANTS
ACCOUNTING RECORDS
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS
ACCOUNTS
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY
ANTI-CORRUPTION
ATTESTATION
AUDIT COMMITTEES
AUDITING
AUDITORS
AUDITS
AUTONOMY
BORROWING
BUDGET EXECUTION
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
BUDGET REVENUES
BUDGETARY FUNDS
BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
BUDGETARY SUPPORT
BUDGETING
CASH MANAGEMENT
CENTRAL BANK OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS
CENTRALIZATION
CITIZENS
CONSENSUS
CONSOLIDATION
CORRUPTION
DEBT MANAGEMENT
DECISION-MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DISCLOSURE
EBF
EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE
EXECUTION
EXECUTIVE POWER
EXPENDITURES
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
FINANCIAL PLANNING
FINANCIAL REPORTING
FINANCIAL SECTOR
FISCAL
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL RESOURCES
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
FISCAL YEAR
FOREIGN DEBT
FOREIGN TRADE
GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS
GOVERNMENT SECTOR
GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
INTERNAL AUDIT
INTERNAL AUDITING
INTERNAL CONTROLS
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
LAWS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL PROVISIONS
LEGALITY
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT
LEGISLATURE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE
MUNICIPALITIES
POLITICAL CONTROL
PRIVATE SECTOR
PRIVATIZATION
PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION INSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC FINANCE
PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC FINANCE SECTOR
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
REPORTING SYSTEMS
SOCIAL SECURITY
STATE AGENCIES
STATE GOVERNMENT
STATE INSTITUTIONS
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
TRANSPARENCY
TREASURY
spellingShingle PUBLIC FINANCE
POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION
TRANSITIONAL ECONOMIES
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS
PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL PLANNING
GOVERNMENT PLANNING
BUDGET PROCESS
BUDGETARY SUPPORT
BUDGET CONTROL
RISK ASSESSMENT
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING
PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
AUDITING
BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT
CAPACITY BUILDING
HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
INVESTMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
FISCAL CONSTRAINTS
CONSENSUS APPROACH
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
REFORM POLICY
ADMINISTRATIVE CAPABILITY
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
POLITICAL POWER
CORRUPT PRACTICES
CONFLICT OF INTERESTS
PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM ACCOUNT
ACCOUNTABILITY
ACCOUNTANCY
ACCOUNTANTS
ACCOUNTING RECORDS
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS
ACCOUNTS
ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY
ANTI-CORRUPTION
ATTESTATION
AUDIT COMMITTEES
AUDITING
AUDITORS
AUDITS
AUTONOMY
BORROWING
BUDGET EXECUTION
BUDGET MANAGEMENT
BUDGET REVENUES
BUDGETARY FUNDS
BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS
BUDGETARY RESOURCES
BUDGETARY SUPPORT
BUDGETING
CASH MANAGEMENT
CENTRAL BANK OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS
CENTRALIZATION
CITIZENS
CONSENSUS
CONSOLIDATION
CORRUPTION
DEBT MANAGEMENT
DECISION-MAKING
DEMOCRACY
DISCLOSURE
EBF
EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE
EXECUTION
EXECUTIVE POWER
EXPENDITURES
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
FINANCIAL PLANNING
FINANCIAL REPORTING
FINANCIAL SECTOR
FISCAL
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
FISCAL RESOURCES
FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY
FISCAL YEAR
FOREIGN DEBT
FOREIGN TRADE
GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS
GOVERNMENT SECTOR
GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE
GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
INTERNAL AUDIT
INTERNAL AUDITING
INTERNAL CONTROLS
INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
LAWS
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
LEGAL PROVISIONS
LEGALITY
LEGISLATION
LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT
LEGISLATURE
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE
MUNICIPALITIES
POLITICAL CONTROL
PRIVATE SECTOR
PRIVATIZATION
PROCUREMENT
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION INSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC DISCLOSURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC FINANCE
PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC FINANCE SECTOR
PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS
PUBLIC RESOURCES
PUBLIC SECTOR
PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING
REGULATORY FRAMEWORK
REPORTING SYSTEMS
SOCIAL SECURITY
STATE AGENCIES
STATE GOVERNMENT
STATE INSTITUTIONS
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
TRANSPARENCY
TREASURY
World Bank
Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
geographic_facet Europe and Central Asia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
description This Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) was prepared on the basis of the findings of a World Bank mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2001, and reflects developments through early 2002. The CFAA was a constituent element of the Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (PEIR) published in June 2002 on the basis of work carried out in 2001-2002, and the key findings of the CFAA on the public expenditure policy and institutional framework form a significant part of the PEIR section dealing with financial management in the government sector. While some of the diagnosis presented in this CFAA may have been overtaken by events since early 2002, most of its recommendations remain valid and the report provides a sound analytical framework for ongoing reforms in the field of public expenditure management. The country is in transition not only to a market and a post-war economy, but also to a peculiar (and still fragile) conception of statehood. Public administration in BiH combines pre-war, wartime and post-war institutions, often exercising overlapping administrative authority. The administrative organs operating within a complex governmental structure, the international strategy focus is on building the institutional base of BiH's democracy and fiscal management, using international influence to protect key institutions during their vulnerable early phase, and bring them to a point where they can sustain themselves after international support is withdrawn. At the same time, the way to Europe being the creation of a single free economic space in BIH, harmonization and creation of common institutions are crucial. Statehood needs to be reinforced and specific areas need to be strengthened in the two Entities in view of the requirements for EU accession. The CFAA recommends support of the shift of key institutions and processes from the Entities to the State as advocated by the IC. Such a shift would empower State institutions with stable and predictable budgetary resources and ensure harmonized fiscal management and oversight. At the same time, to mitigate concerns about over-centralization, effective governance should be promoted at the cantonal and municipal levels, where financial accountability is also weak.
format Economic & Sector Work :: Country Financial Accountability Assessment
author World Bank
author_facet World Bank
author_sort World Bank
title Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
title_short Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
title_full Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
title_fullStr Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment
title_sort bosnia and herzegovina : country financial accountability assessment
publisher Washington, DC
publishDate 2013
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/06/2821384/bosnia-herzegovina-country-financial-accountability-assessment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14690
_version_ 1764428421524357120
spelling okr-10986-146902021-04-23T14:03:17Z Bosnia and Herzegovina : Country Financial Accountability Assessment World Bank PUBLIC FINANCE POST-CONFLICT RECONSTRUCTION TRANSITIONAL ECONOMIES PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS PRIVATE SECTOR MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PLANNING GOVERNMENT PLANNING BUDGET PROCESS BUDGETARY SUPPORT BUDGET CONTROL RISK ASSESSMENT GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTING PUBLIC EXPENDITURES ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS ACCOUNTING STANDARDS AUDITING BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT CAPACITY BUILDING HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT OF PUBLIC FUNDS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE FISCAL CONSTRAINTS CONSENSUS APPROACH INFORMATION MANAGEMENT REFORM POLICY ADMINISTRATIVE CAPABILITY LEGAL FRAMEWORK POLITICAL POWER CORRUPT PRACTICES CONFLICT OF INTERESTS PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM ACCOUNT ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTANCY ACCOUNTANTS ACCOUNTING RECORDS ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ACCOUNTING SYSTEMS ACCOUNTS ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY ANTI-CORRUPTION ATTESTATION AUDIT COMMITTEES AUDITING AUDITORS AUDITS AUTONOMY BORROWING BUDGET EXECUTION BUDGET MANAGEMENT BUDGET REVENUES BUDGETARY FUNDS BUDGETARY INSTITUTIONS BUDGETARY RESOURCES BUDGETARY SUPPORT BUDGETING CASH MANAGEMENT CENTRAL BANK OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA CENTRAL GOVERNMENTS CENTRALIZATION CITIZENS CONSENSUS CONSOLIDATION CORRUPTION DEBT MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING DEMOCRACY DISCLOSURE EBF EFFECTIVE GOVERNANCE EXECUTION EXECUTIVE POWER EXPENDITURES FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING FINANCIAL INFORMATION FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS FINANCIAL PLANNING FINANCIAL REPORTING FINANCIAL SECTOR FISCAL FISCAL MANAGEMENT FISCAL RESOURCES FISCAL SUSTAINABILITY FISCAL YEAR FOREIGN DEBT FOREIGN TRADE GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS GOVERNMENT SECTOR GOVERNMENTAL STRUCTURE GROSS DOMESTIC PRODUCT INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK INTERNAL AUDIT INTERNAL AUDITING INTERNAL CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS LAWS LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL PROVISIONS LEGALITY LEGISLATION LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT LEGISLATURE MINISTRY OF FINANCE MUNICIPAL INFRASTRUCTURE MUNICIPALITIES POLITICAL CONTROL PRIVATE SECTOR PRIVATIZATION PROCUREMENT PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION INSTITUTIONS PUBLIC DISCLOSURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE PUBLIC EXPENDITURE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT PUBLIC FINANCE SECTOR PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS PUBLIC RESOURCES PUBLIC SECTOR PUBLIC SECTOR ACCOUNTING REGULATORY FRAMEWORK REPORTING SYSTEMS SOCIAL SECURITY STATE AGENCIES STATE GOVERNMENT STATE INSTITUTIONS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSPARENCY TREASURY This Country Financial Accountability Assessment (CFAA) was prepared on the basis of the findings of a World Bank mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina in 2001, and reflects developments through early 2002. The CFAA was a constituent element of the Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (PEIR) published in June 2002 on the basis of work carried out in 2001-2002, and the key findings of the CFAA on the public expenditure policy and institutional framework form a significant part of the PEIR section dealing with financial management in the government sector. While some of the diagnosis presented in this CFAA may have been overtaken by events since early 2002, most of its recommendations remain valid and the report provides a sound analytical framework for ongoing reforms in the field of public expenditure management. The country is in transition not only to a market and a post-war economy, but also to a peculiar (and still fragile) conception of statehood. Public administration in BiH combines pre-war, wartime and post-war institutions, often exercising overlapping administrative authority. The administrative organs operating within a complex governmental structure, the international strategy focus is on building the institutional base of BiH's democracy and fiscal management, using international influence to protect key institutions during their vulnerable early phase, and bring them to a point where they can sustain themselves after international support is withdrawn. At the same time, the way to Europe being the creation of a single free economic space in BIH, harmonization and creation of common institutions are crucial. Statehood needs to be reinforced and specific areas need to be strengthened in the two Entities in view of the requirements for EU accession. The CFAA recommends support of the shift of key institutions and processes from the Entities to the State as advocated by the IC. Such a shift would empower State institutions with stable and predictable budgetary resources and ensure harmonized fiscal management and oversight. At the same time, to mitigate concerns about over-centralization, effective governance should be promoted at the cantonal and municipal levels, where financial accountability is also weak. 2013-07-31T20:19:59Z 2013-07-31T20:19:59Z 2003-06-10 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/06/2821384/bosnia-herzegovina-country-financial-accountability-assessment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/14690 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Country Financial Accountability Assessment Economic & Sector Work Europe and Central Asia Bosnia and Herzegovina