Health Financing for Poor People : Resource Mobilization and Risk Sharing
Most community financing schemes have evolved in the context of severe economic constraints, political instability, and lack of good governance. Usually government taxation capacity is weak, formal mechanisms of social protection for vulnerable pop...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Publication |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC: World Bank
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2004/05/3522037/health-financing-poor-people-resource-mobilization-risk-sharing http://hdl.handle.net/10986/15019 |
Summary: | Most community financing schemes have
evolved in the context of severe economic constraints,
political instability, and lack of good governance. Usually
government taxation capacity is weak, formal mechanisms of
social protection for vulnerable populations absent, and
government oversight of the informal health sector lacking.
In this context of extreme public sector failure, community
involvement in the financing of health care provides a
critical albeit insufficient first step in the long march
towards improved access to health care by the poor and
social protection against the cost of illness. Health
Financing for Poor People stresses that community financing
schemes are no panacea for the problems that low-income
countries face in resource mobilization. They should be
regarded as a complement to - not as a substitute for -
strong government involvement in health care financing and
risk management related to the cost of illness. Based on an
extensive survey of the literature, the main strengths of
community financing schemes are the extent of outreach
penetration achieved through community participation, their
contribution to financial protection against illness, and
increase in access to health care by low-income rural and
informal sector workers. Their main weaknesses are the low
volume of revenues that can be mobilized from poor
communities, the frequent exclusion of the very poorest from
participation in such schemes without some form of subsidy,
the small size of the risk pool, the limited management
capacity that exists in rural and low-income contexts, and
their isolation from the more comprehensive benefits that
are often available through more formal health financing
mechanisms and provider networks. The authors conclude by
proposing concrete public policy measures that governments
can introduce to strengthen and improve the effectiveness of
community involvement in health care financing. |
---|