Debt Management Performance Assessment : The Gambia
During January 11 to 20, 2010, a World Bank team undertook a Debt Management Performance Assessment (DeMPA) mission to Gambia. This tool provides a methodology for assessing government debt management performance through a comprehensive set of dime...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Economic & Sector Work |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/04/13944334/gambia-debt-management-performance-assessment-dempa http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16233 |
Summary: | During January 11 to 20, 2010, a World
Bank team undertook a Debt Management Performance Assessment
(DeMPA) mission to Gambia. This tool provides a methodology
for assessing government debt management performance through
a comprehensive set of dimensions spanning the full range of
DeM functions. The first time the tool was applied in Gambia
was in 2007, when a pilot study was carried out, and this
was a follow-up mission. The DeMPA methodology has evolved
since the report made in 2007 and therefore it is not
possible to carry out a strict comparison of the two DeMPA
reports in terms of individual indicators as the detailed
dimensions that make up an indicator are no longer
aggregated; instead, each dimension is given a specific
score. It is clear however that Gambia's debt
management has progressed substantially in some dimensions
during recent years although there are still remaining
issues that would benefit from reform and institutional
capacity-building. The mission notes that given that several
reforms are currently being implemented, it is to be
expected that future DeMPA evaluations will show stronger
scores. At this moment there is institutional
capacity-building in the area of the Integrated Financial
Management Information System (IFMIS) and cash management;
the design of procedures manuals for Directorate of Debt
Management (DDM), and the design of a draft bill on public
debt management which would provide a more strategic,
objectives-based legal orientation to debt management. |
---|