Sovereign Ratings in the Post-Crisis World : An Analysis of Actual, Shadow and Relative Risk Ratings
This paper analyzes the evolution of sovereign credit ratings in the wake of the global financial crisis by studying changes in actual, shadow, and relative ratings between 2008 and 2012. For countries that do not have a rating from the major ratin...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/10/18360008/sovereign-ratings-post-crisis-world-analysis-actual-shadow-relative-risk-ratings http://hdl.handle.net/10986/16859 |
Summary: | This paper analyzes the evolution of
sovereign credit ratings in the wake of the global financial
crisis by studying changes in actual, shadow, and relative
ratings between 2008 and 2012. For countries that do not
have a rating from the major rating agencies, shadow ratings
are estimated as a function of macroeconomic, structural,
and governance variables. The shadow rating exercise
confirms earlier findings in the literature that even after
the financial crisis, many unrated countries appear to be
more creditworthy than previously believed and can access
international capital markets. The paper also develops a new
rating scale called the "relative risk rating,"
which ranks countries according to their actual or shadow
ratings after controlling for changes in the world weighted
average rating. When relative ratings in 2012 are compared
with the first half of 2008, the world average rating is
found to be weaker because of the financial crisis. The
relative rating improved in developing economies such as
Azerbaijan, Ethiopia, Kazakhstan, Indonesia, and the
Philippines, whereas it deteriorated in crisis-affected
high-income countries such as Cyprus, Greece, Spain,
Portugal, Ireland, and Egypt. Interestingly, India, Jordan,
Poland, and the United Kingdom had their rating outlook
downgraded by the rating agencies, but their relative rating
actually improved as other countries suffered even worse
downgrades. A regression model is used to analyze the
relative contributions of different variables to rating
changes during 2008-2012, a helpful feature for policy
makers interested in improving sovereign ratings. |
---|