The Political Economy of Sanitation : How Can We Increase Investment and Improve Service for the Poor?
This study follows current approaches to political economy-interdisciplinary inquiry drawing upon social and political theory and economic principles-to understand how political actors, institutions, and economic processes influence each other. The...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2011/02/13909314/political-economy-sanitation-can-increase-investment-improve-service-poor-vol-2-2-main-report http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17276 |
Summary: | This study follows current approaches to
political economy-interdisciplinary inquiry drawing upon
social and political theory and economic principles-to
understand how political actors, institutions, and economic
processes influence each other. The 'political economy
of sanitation,' therefore, refers to the social,
political, and economic processes and factors that determine
the extent and nature of sanitation investment and service
provision. This study's conceptual framework combines a
diagnostic component with a typology of actions to help
translate analytical findings into more effective support to
operations and investments. The diagnostic framework aims to
identify political economy constraints as well as
opportunities that are entry points for subsequent
operational actions. The study was conducted through a
qualitative analysis of stakeholders, institutions, impacts,
risks, and opportunities that was linked to processes and
policy debate. This synthesis report is based on the
findings from the secondary literature review and the
results of primary research in the four case study
countries, which examined how each had identified and
managed political economy risks and opportunities in its
sanitation interventions. Overall, the study confirms the
importance of assessing stakeholder interests, identifying
potential winners and losers, identifying incentives, and
examining formal and informal institutions. |
---|