Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment
This paper studies the relative academic performance of students tracked or randomly assigned to South African university dormitories. Tracked or streamed assignment creates dormitories where all students obtained similar scores on high school grad...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/02/19135855/academic-peer-effects-different-group-assignment-policies-residential-tracking-versus-random-sssignment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17331 |
id |
okr-10986-17331 |
---|---|
recordtype |
oai_dc |
repository_type |
Digital Repository |
institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
institution |
Digital Repositories |
building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
collection |
World Bank |
language |
English en_US |
topic |
ACADEMIC OUTCOMES ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACADEMIC YEAR ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ATTENTION AVERAGE SCORE AVERAGE TEST SCORES AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT BLACK STUDENTS BOARDING BOARDING SCHOOLS BUSINESS SCHOOL CLASS SIZE CLASSROOM CLASSROOMS COLLEGE ADMISSIONS COMPETENCE COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION CONDITIONING DATA ON STUDENTS DEMONSTRATION DISSERTATION ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION EDUCATION OUTCOMES EDUCATION SYSTEMS EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT ENROLLMENT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION EXAM FACULTIES FINAL EXAM FINAL EXAMS FIRST GRADE FUTURE RESEARCH GENDER GRADING GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATION RATES HEALTH SCIENCES HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS HIGH SCHOOLS HIGHER EDUCATION HOME LANGUAGE HOMEWORK HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCOMING STUDENTS INFERENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTION INSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INTERVENTIONS LEARNING LITERATURE LOW-INCOME STUDENTS MATHEMATICS MOTIVATION OPEN ACCESS PAPERS PEER GROUP PEER GROUPS PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS PRIVATE SCHOOLS PROFICIENCY RESEARCH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL LOCATION SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SCHOOLS SCIENCE CLASSES SHOW HOW SOCIAL GROUPS SOCIAL SCIENCES STREAMING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STUDENT BODY STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS STUDENT DATA STUDENT HOUSING STUDENT OUTCOMES STUDENT PERFORMANCE STUDENT POPULATION STUDENT SELECTION STUDENT WELFARE STUDY SKILLS SUBJECTS TEACHER TEACHER BEHAVIOR TEACHERS TEST SCORES TUITION TYPES OF STUDENTS UNIVERSITIES UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS VOUCHERS |
spellingShingle |
ACADEMIC OUTCOMES ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACADEMIC YEAR ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ATTENTION AVERAGE SCORE AVERAGE TEST SCORES AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT BLACK STUDENTS BOARDING BOARDING SCHOOLS BUSINESS SCHOOL CLASS SIZE CLASSROOM CLASSROOMS COLLEGE ADMISSIONS COMPETENCE COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION CONDITIONING DATA ON STUDENTS DEMONSTRATION DISSERTATION ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION EDUCATION OUTCOMES EDUCATION SYSTEMS EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT ENROLLMENT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION EXAM FACULTIES FINAL EXAM FINAL EXAMS FIRST GRADE FUTURE RESEARCH GENDER GRADING GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATION RATES HEALTH SCIENCES HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS HIGH SCHOOLS HIGHER EDUCATION HOME LANGUAGE HOMEWORK HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCOMING STUDENTS INFERENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTION INSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INTERVENTIONS LEARNING LITERATURE LOW-INCOME STUDENTS MATHEMATICS MOTIVATION OPEN ACCESS PAPERS PEER GROUP PEER GROUPS PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS PRIVATE SCHOOLS PROFICIENCY RESEARCH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL LOCATION SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SCHOOLS SCIENCE CLASSES SHOW HOW SOCIAL GROUPS SOCIAL SCIENCES STREAMING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STUDENT BODY STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS STUDENT DATA STUDENT HOUSING STUDENT OUTCOMES STUDENT PERFORMANCE STUDENT POPULATION STUDENT SELECTION STUDENT WELFARE STUDY SKILLS SUBJECTS TEACHER TEACHER BEHAVIOR TEACHERS TEST SCORES TUITION TYPES OF STUDENTS UNIVERSITIES UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS VOUCHERS Garlick, Robert Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment |
relation |
Policy Research Working Paper;No. 6787 |
description |
This paper studies the relative academic
performance of students tracked or randomly assigned to
South African university dormitories. Tracked or streamed
assignment creates dormitories where all students obtained
similar scores on high school graduation examinations.
Random assignment creates dormitories that are approximately
representative of the population of students. Tracking
lowers students' mean grades in their first year of
university and increases the variance or inequality of
grades. This result is driven by a large negative effect of
tracking on low-scoring students' grades and a
near-zero effect on high-scoring students' grades.
Low-scoring students are more sensitive to changes in their
peer group composition and their grades suffer if they live
only with low-scoring peers. In this setting, residential
tracking has undesirable efficiency (lower mean) and equity
(higher variance) effects. The result isolates a pure peer
effect of tracking, whereas classroom tracking studies
identify a combination of peer effects and differences in
teacher behavior across tracked and untracked classrooms.
The negative pure peer effect of residential tracking
suggests that classroom tracking may also have negative
effects unless teachers are more effective in homogeneous
classrooms. Random variation in peer group composition under
random dormitory assignment also generates peer effects.
Living with higher-scoring peers increases students'
grades and the effect is larger for low-scoring students.
This is consistent with the aggregate effects of tracking
relative to random assignment. However, using peer effects
estimated in randomly assigned groups to predict outcomes in
tracked groups yields unreliable predictions. This
illustrates a more general risk that peer effects estimated
under one peer group assignment policy provide limited
information about how peer effects might work with a
different peer group assignment policy. |
format |
Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper |
author |
Garlick, Robert |
author_facet |
Garlick, Robert |
author_sort |
Garlick, Robert |
title |
Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment |
title_short |
Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment |
title_full |
Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment |
title_fullStr |
Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment |
title_sort |
academic peer effects with different group assignment policies : residential tracking versus random assignment |
publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/02/19135855/academic-peer-effects-different-group-assignment-policies-residential-tracking-versus-random-sssignment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17331 |
_version_ |
1764436885794455552 |
spelling |
okr-10986-173312021-04-23T14:03:37Z Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment Garlick, Robert ACADEMIC OUTCOMES ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACADEMIC YEAR ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ATTENTION AVERAGE SCORE AVERAGE TEST SCORES AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT BLACK STUDENTS BOARDING BOARDING SCHOOLS BUSINESS SCHOOL CLASS SIZE CLASSROOM CLASSROOMS COLLEGE ADMISSIONS COMPETENCE COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION CONDITIONING DATA ON STUDENTS DEMONSTRATION DISSERTATION ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION EDUCATION OUTCOMES EDUCATION SYSTEMS EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT ENROLLMENT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION EXAM FACULTIES FINAL EXAM FINAL EXAMS FIRST GRADE FUTURE RESEARCH GENDER GRADING GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATION RATES HEALTH SCIENCES HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS HIGH SCHOOLS HIGHER EDUCATION HOME LANGUAGE HOMEWORK HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCOMING STUDENTS INFERENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTION INSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INTERVENTIONS LEARNING LITERATURE LOW-INCOME STUDENTS MATHEMATICS MOTIVATION OPEN ACCESS PAPERS PEER GROUP PEER GROUPS PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS PRIVATE SCHOOLS PROFICIENCY RESEARCH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL LOCATION SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SCHOOLS SCIENCE CLASSES SHOW HOW SOCIAL GROUPS SOCIAL SCIENCES STREAMING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STUDENT BODY STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS STUDENT DATA STUDENT HOUSING STUDENT OUTCOMES STUDENT PERFORMANCE STUDENT POPULATION STUDENT SELECTION STUDENT WELFARE STUDY SKILLS SUBJECTS TEACHER TEACHER BEHAVIOR TEACHERS TEST SCORES TUITION TYPES OF STUDENTS UNIVERSITIES UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS VOUCHERS This paper studies the relative academic performance of students tracked or randomly assigned to South African university dormitories. Tracked or streamed assignment creates dormitories where all students obtained similar scores on high school graduation examinations. Random assignment creates dormitories that are approximately representative of the population of students. Tracking lowers students' mean grades in their first year of university and increases the variance or inequality of grades. This result is driven by a large negative effect of tracking on low-scoring students' grades and a near-zero effect on high-scoring students' grades. Low-scoring students are more sensitive to changes in their peer group composition and their grades suffer if they live only with low-scoring peers. In this setting, residential tracking has undesirable efficiency (lower mean) and equity (higher variance) effects. The result isolates a pure peer effect of tracking, whereas classroom tracking studies identify a combination of peer effects and differences in teacher behavior across tracked and untracked classrooms. The negative pure peer effect of residential tracking suggests that classroom tracking may also have negative effects unless teachers are more effective in homogeneous classrooms. Random variation in peer group composition under random dormitory assignment also generates peer effects. Living with higher-scoring peers increases students' grades and the effect is larger for low-scoring students. This is consistent with the aggregate effects of tracking relative to random assignment. However, using peer effects estimated in randomly assigned groups to predict outcomes in tracked groups yields unreliable predictions. This illustrates a more general risk that peer effects estimated under one peer group assignment policy provide limited information about how peer effects might work with a different peer group assignment policy. 2014-03-18T21:22:40Z 2014-03-18T21:22:40Z 2014-02 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/02/19135855/academic-peer-effects-different-group-assignment-policies-residential-tracking-versus-random-sssignment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17331 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 6787 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research |