Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment

This paper studies the relative academic performance of students tracked or randomly assigned to South African university dormitories. Tracked or streamed assignment creates dormitories where all students obtained similar scores on high school grad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Garlick, Robert
Format: Policy Research Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/02/19135855/academic-peer-effects-different-group-assignment-policies-residential-tracking-versus-random-sssignment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17331
id okr-10986-17331
recordtype oai_dc
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic ACADEMIC OUTCOMES
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
ACADEMIC YEAR
ADJUSTMENT
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
ATTENTION
AVERAGE SCORE
AVERAGE TEST SCORES
AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT
BLACK STUDENTS
BOARDING
BOARDING SCHOOLS
BUSINESS SCHOOL
CLASS SIZE
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOMS
COLLEGE ADMISSIONS
COMPETENCE
COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION
CONDITIONING
DATA ON STUDENTS
DEMONSTRATION
DISSERTATION
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION
EDUCATION OUTCOMES
EDUCATION SYSTEMS
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
ENROLLMENT
ENTRANCE EXAMINATION
EXAM
FACULTIES
FINAL EXAM
FINAL EXAMS
FIRST GRADE
FUTURE RESEARCH
GENDER
GRADING
GRADUATE STUDIES
GRADUATION RATES
HEALTH SCIENCES
HIGH SCHOOL
HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
HIGH SCHOOLS
HIGHER EDUCATION
HOME LANGUAGE
HOMEWORK
HUMAN CAPITAL
HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
INCOMING STUDENTS
INFERENCE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
INSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTORS
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS
INTERVENTIONS
LEARNING
LITERATURE
LOW-INCOME STUDENTS
MATHEMATICS
MOTIVATION
OPEN ACCESS
PAPERS
PEER GROUP
PEER GROUPS
PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS
PRIMARY SCHOOL
PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
PRIVATE SCHOOLS
PROFICIENCY
RESEARCH UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL LOCATION
SCHOOL MANAGEMENT
SCHOOLS
SCIENCE CLASSES
SHOW HOW
SOCIAL GROUPS
SOCIAL SCIENCES
STREAMING
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
STUDENT BODY
STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS
STUDENT DATA
STUDENT HOUSING
STUDENT OUTCOMES
STUDENT PERFORMANCE
STUDENT POPULATION
STUDENT SELECTION
STUDENT WELFARE
STUDY SKILLS
SUBJECTS
TEACHER
TEACHER BEHAVIOR
TEACHERS
TEST SCORES
TUITION
TYPES OF STUDENTS
UNIVERSITIES
UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS
UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
VOUCHERS
spellingShingle ACADEMIC OUTCOMES
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
ACADEMIC YEAR
ADJUSTMENT
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR
ATTENTION
AVERAGE SCORE
AVERAGE TEST SCORES
AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT
BLACK STUDENTS
BOARDING
BOARDING SCHOOLS
BUSINESS SCHOOL
CLASS SIZE
CLASSROOM
CLASSROOMS
COLLEGE ADMISSIONS
COMPETENCE
COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION
CONDITIONING
DATA ON STUDENTS
DEMONSTRATION
DISSERTATION
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION
EDUCATION OUTCOMES
EDUCATION SYSTEMS
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
ENROLLMENT
ENTRANCE EXAMINATION
EXAM
FACULTIES
FINAL EXAM
FINAL EXAMS
FIRST GRADE
FUTURE RESEARCH
GENDER
GRADING
GRADUATE STUDIES
GRADUATION RATES
HEALTH SCIENCES
HIGH SCHOOL
HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS
HIGH SCHOOLS
HIGHER EDUCATION
HOME LANGUAGE
HOMEWORK
HUMAN CAPITAL
HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
INCOMING STUDENTS
INFERENCE
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
INSTRUCTION
INSTRUCTORS
INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS
INTERVENTIONS
LEARNING
LITERATURE
LOW-INCOME STUDENTS
MATHEMATICS
MOTIVATION
OPEN ACCESS
PAPERS
PEER GROUP
PEER GROUPS
PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS
PRIMARY SCHOOL
PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS
PRIVATE SCHOOLS
PROFICIENCY
RESEARCH UNIVERSITY
SCHOOL LOCATION
SCHOOL MANAGEMENT
SCHOOLS
SCIENCE CLASSES
SHOW HOW
SOCIAL GROUPS
SOCIAL SCIENCES
STREAMING
STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT
STUDENT BODY
STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS
STUDENT DATA
STUDENT HOUSING
STUDENT OUTCOMES
STUDENT PERFORMANCE
STUDENT POPULATION
STUDENT SELECTION
STUDENT WELFARE
STUDY SKILLS
SUBJECTS
TEACHER
TEACHER BEHAVIOR
TEACHERS
TEST SCORES
TUITION
TYPES OF STUDENTS
UNIVERSITIES
UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS
UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT
UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
VOUCHERS
Garlick, Robert
Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 6787
description This paper studies the relative academic performance of students tracked or randomly assigned to South African university dormitories. Tracked or streamed assignment creates dormitories where all students obtained similar scores on high school graduation examinations. Random assignment creates dormitories that are approximately representative of the population of students. Tracking lowers students' mean grades in their first year of university and increases the variance or inequality of grades. This result is driven by a large negative effect of tracking on low-scoring students' grades and a near-zero effect on high-scoring students' grades. Low-scoring students are more sensitive to changes in their peer group composition and their grades suffer if they live only with low-scoring peers. In this setting, residential tracking has undesirable efficiency (lower mean) and equity (higher variance) effects. The result isolates a pure peer effect of tracking, whereas classroom tracking studies identify a combination of peer effects and differences in teacher behavior across tracked and untracked classrooms. The negative pure peer effect of residential tracking suggests that classroom tracking may also have negative effects unless teachers are more effective in homogeneous classrooms. Random variation in peer group composition under random dormitory assignment also generates peer effects. Living with higher-scoring peers increases students' grades and the effect is larger for low-scoring students. This is consistent with the aggregate effects of tracking relative to random assignment. However, using peer effects estimated in randomly assigned groups to predict outcomes in tracked groups yields unreliable predictions. This illustrates a more general risk that peer effects estimated under one peer group assignment policy provide limited information about how peer effects might work with a different peer group assignment policy.
format Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
author Garlick, Robert
author_facet Garlick, Robert
author_sort Garlick, Robert
title Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment
title_short Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment
title_full Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment
title_fullStr Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment
title_full_unstemmed Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment
title_sort academic peer effects with different group assignment policies : residential tracking versus random assignment
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2014
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/02/19135855/academic-peer-effects-different-group-assignment-policies-residential-tracking-versus-random-sssignment
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17331
_version_ 1764436885794455552
spelling okr-10986-173312021-04-23T14:03:37Z Academic Peer Effects with Different Group Assignment Policies : Residential Tracking versus Random Assignment Garlick, Robert ACADEMIC OUTCOMES ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE ACADEMIC YEAR ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ATTENTION AVERAGE SCORE AVERAGE TEST SCORES AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECT BLACK STUDENTS BOARDING BOARDING SCHOOLS BUSINESS SCHOOL CLASS SIZE CLASSROOM CLASSROOMS COLLEGE ADMISSIONS COMPETENCE COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION CONDITIONING DATA ON STUDENTS DEMONSTRATION DISSERTATION ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION EDUCATION OUTCOMES EDUCATION SYSTEMS EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT ENROLLMENT ENTRANCE EXAMINATION EXAM FACULTIES FINAL EXAM FINAL EXAMS FIRST GRADE FUTURE RESEARCH GENDER GRADING GRADUATE STUDIES GRADUATION RATES HEALTH SCIENCES HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS HIGH SCHOOLS HIGHER EDUCATION HOME LANGUAGE HOMEWORK HUMAN CAPITAL HUMAN CAPITAL INVESTMENT HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCOMING STUDENTS INFERENCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INSTRUCTION INSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS INTERVENTIONS LEARNING LITERATURE LOW-INCOME STUDENTS MATHEMATICS MOTIVATION OPEN ACCESS PAPERS PEER GROUP PEER GROUPS PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS PRIMARY SCHOOL PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS PRIVATE SCHOOLS PROFICIENCY RESEARCH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL LOCATION SCHOOL MANAGEMENT SCHOOLS SCIENCE CLASSES SHOW HOW SOCIAL GROUPS SOCIAL SCIENCES STREAMING STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STUDENT BODY STUDENT CHARACTERISTICS STUDENT DATA STUDENT HOUSING STUDENT OUTCOMES STUDENT PERFORMANCE STUDENT POPULATION STUDENT SELECTION STUDENT WELFARE STUDY SKILLS SUBJECTS TEACHER TEACHER BEHAVIOR TEACHERS TEST SCORES TUITION TYPES OF STUDENTS UNIVERSITIES UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATORS UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT UNIVERSITY STUDENTS VOUCHERS This paper studies the relative academic performance of students tracked or randomly assigned to South African university dormitories. Tracked or streamed assignment creates dormitories where all students obtained similar scores on high school graduation examinations. Random assignment creates dormitories that are approximately representative of the population of students. Tracking lowers students' mean grades in their first year of university and increases the variance or inequality of grades. This result is driven by a large negative effect of tracking on low-scoring students' grades and a near-zero effect on high-scoring students' grades. Low-scoring students are more sensitive to changes in their peer group composition and their grades suffer if they live only with low-scoring peers. In this setting, residential tracking has undesirable efficiency (lower mean) and equity (higher variance) effects. The result isolates a pure peer effect of tracking, whereas classroom tracking studies identify a combination of peer effects and differences in teacher behavior across tracked and untracked classrooms. The negative pure peer effect of residential tracking suggests that classroom tracking may also have negative effects unless teachers are more effective in homogeneous classrooms. Random variation in peer group composition under random dormitory assignment also generates peer effects. Living with higher-scoring peers increases students' grades and the effect is larger for low-scoring students. This is consistent with the aggregate effects of tracking relative to random assignment. However, using peer effects estimated in randomly assigned groups to predict outcomes in tracked groups yields unreliable predictions. This illustrates a more general risk that peer effects estimated under one peer group assignment policy provide limited information about how peer effects might work with a different peer group assignment policy. 2014-03-18T21:22:40Z 2014-03-18T21:22:40Z 2014-02 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/02/19135855/academic-peer-effects-different-group-assignment-policies-residential-tracking-versus-random-sssignment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17331 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 6787 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper Publications & Research