Capital Account Liberalization : What Do Cross-Country Studies Tell Us?
Capital account liberalization, it is fair to say, remains one of the most controversial and least understood policies of our day. One reason is that different theoretical perspectives have very different implications for the desirability of libera...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal Article |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2001/09/17737458/capital-account-liberalization-cross-country-studies-tell http://hdl.handle.net/10986/17435 |
| Summary: | Capital account liberalization, it is
fair to say, remains one of the most controversial and least
understood policies of our day. One reason is that different
theoretical perspectives have very different implications
for the desirability of liberalizing capital flows. Another
is that empirical analysis has failed to yield conclusive
results. The answer, another influential strand of thought
contends, is that this efficient-markets paradigm is
fundamentally misleading when applied to capital flows.
Limits on capital movements are a distortion. It is an
implication of the theory of the second best that removing
one distortion need not be welfare enhancing when other
distortions are present. |
|---|