Surveying Justice : A Practical Guide to Household Surveys
Though household surveys have long been an established part of development practice and regularly used to gather data on poverty incidence and the range of associated indicators, they have not yet become a common tool of justice reform practitioner...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/01/12600211/surveying-justice-practical-guide-household-surveys http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18104 |
| id |
okr-10986-18104 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English en_US |
| topic |
ABUSE ACCOUNTABILITY ACTIONS ASSETS BEST PRACTICE BEST PRACTICES BRIBE BRIBERY BRIBES CAPACITY BUILDING CHANGE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMMUNITY SURVEYS CONFIDENCE CORRUPT CORRUPT OFFICIAL CORRUPTION CRIME CRIMINAL DATA COLLECTION DATA ENTRY DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DISCRETION DISCUSSIONS ETHICS EXPERIMENTATION FACILITY SURVEYS FAMILY LIFE SURVEYS GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS IMPACT EVALUATION INITIATIVE INTEGRATED APPROACH INTEGRITY INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERVENTION INTERVIEWS INVESTIGATION JUSTICE LAW ENFORCEMENT LAWYERS LEADERSHIP LIVELIHOOD LIVELIHOODS LIVING STANDARDS LIVING STANDARDS MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGIES METHODOLOGY MONITORING DATA NGO OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS OPINION OPINIONS PATRONAGE PERCEPTION PERCEPTIONS POLICE POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT EVALUATION PROJECT MONITORING PUBLIC OFFICIAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS QUALITATIVE METHODS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE DATA QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRES RANDOM SAMPLES RELIABILITY RESEARCH METHODS RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS RESEARCH PAPERS RESEARCH PROGRAMS RESEARCHERS RULE OF LAW SAMPLE DESIGN SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SURVEYS SATISFACTION SURVEYS SOCIAL ASPECTS SOCIAL CHANGE SOCIAL NORMS SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH SUCCESS INDICATORS SURVEY DATA SURVEY DESIGN SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY INSTRUMENTS SURVEY MODULES SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES SURVEY QUESTIONS SURVEY RESULTS SURVEY SAMPLE SURVEYING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TARGETING TECHNIQUES TELEPHONE SURVEYS VALIDITY VARIABILITY VIOLENCE WEIGHTING |
| spellingShingle |
ABUSE ACCOUNTABILITY ACTIONS ASSETS BEST PRACTICE BEST PRACTICES BRIBE BRIBERY BRIBES CAPACITY BUILDING CHANGE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMMUNITY SURVEYS CONFIDENCE CORRUPT CORRUPT OFFICIAL CORRUPTION CRIME CRIMINAL DATA COLLECTION DATA ENTRY DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DISCRETION DISCUSSIONS ETHICS EXPERIMENTATION FACILITY SURVEYS FAMILY LIFE SURVEYS GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS IMPACT EVALUATION INITIATIVE INTEGRATED APPROACH INTEGRITY INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERVENTION INTERVIEWS INVESTIGATION JUSTICE LAW ENFORCEMENT LAWYERS LEADERSHIP LIVELIHOOD LIVELIHOODS LIVING STANDARDS LIVING STANDARDS MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGIES METHODOLOGY MONITORING DATA NGO OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS OPINION OPINIONS PATRONAGE PERCEPTION PERCEPTIONS POLICE POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT EVALUATION PROJECT MONITORING PUBLIC OFFICIAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS QUALITATIVE METHODS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE DATA QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRES RANDOM SAMPLES RELIABILITY RESEARCH METHODS RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS RESEARCH PAPERS RESEARCH PROGRAMS RESEARCHERS RULE OF LAW SAMPLE DESIGN SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SURVEYS SATISFACTION SURVEYS SOCIAL ASPECTS SOCIAL CHANGE SOCIAL NORMS SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH SUCCESS INDICATORS SURVEY DATA SURVEY DESIGN SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY INSTRUMENTS SURVEY MODULES SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES SURVEY QUESTIONS SURVEY RESULTS SURVEY SAMPLE SURVEYING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TARGETING TECHNIQUES TELEPHONE SURVEYS VALIDITY VARIABILITY VIOLENCE WEIGHTING Himelein, Kristen Menzies, Nicholas Woolcock, Michael Surveying Justice : A Practical Guide to Household Surveys |
| relation |
Justice and development working paper series;no. 11 |
| description |
Though household surveys have long been
an established part of development practice and regularly
used to gather data on poverty incidence and the range of
associated indicators, they have not yet become a common
tool of justice reform practitioners. This guide aims to be
a practical starting point for integrating justice work and
household data collection, targeted both towards justice
practitioners interested in survey design, as well as survey
researchers interested in incorporating justice questions
into their work. It provides guidance on designing a survey,
suggested topics and questions, and ideas to facilitate a
constructive engagement in discussions around justice in
development practice. Household survey data can be
beneficial to understanding justice questions as household
surveys ordinarily cover a large, randomly selected
cross-section of people - including the rich and poor, urban
and rural dwellers - capturing a population's most
common justice issues. Household survey questions commonly
ask respondents about their most frequently experienced
justice issues, issues when seeking redress, and knowledge
and opinions of the law. Household surveys thus complement
data collection techniques more familiar to justice
practitioners (such as user surveys or sector assessments)
that tend to focus on institutions of the justice sector and
hence capture only the views of those who manage to access
such institutions and privilege the perspectives of system
incumbents. Household surveys have their limitations - not
least significant cost, time and complexity implications. In
addition, the standardized nature of surveys limits the type
of information that can be gleaned and hence household
surveys are generally most useful for gaining a picture of
the "what" when it comes to justice issues, with
complementary research methods often needed to properly
understand the "why." Nevertheless, surveys can
represent a useful starting point for engagement in a
particular context, providing a snap shot of the justice
landscape from which more detailed qualitative and
quantitative studies can be undertaken. |
| format |
Publications & Research :: Working Paper |
| author |
Himelein, Kristen Menzies, Nicholas Woolcock, Michael |
| author_facet |
Himelein, Kristen Menzies, Nicholas Woolcock, Michael |
| author_sort |
Himelein, Kristen |
| title |
Surveying Justice : A Practical Guide to Household Surveys |
| title_short |
Surveying Justice : A Practical Guide to Household Surveys |
| title_full |
Surveying Justice : A Practical Guide to Household Surveys |
| title_fullStr |
Surveying Justice : A Practical Guide to Household Surveys |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Surveying Justice : A Practical Guide to Household Surveys |
| title_sort |
surveying justice : a practical guide to household surveys |
| publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/01/12600211/surveying-justice-practical-guide-household-surveys http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18104 |
| _version_ |
1764435710818910208 |
| spelling |
okr-10986-181042021-04-23T14:03:35Z Surveying Justice : A Practical Guide to Household Surveys Himelein, Kristen Menzies, Nicholas Woolcock, Michael ABUSE ACCOUNTABILITY ACTIONS ASSETS BEST PRACTICE BEST PRACTICES BRIBE BRIBERY BRIBES CAPACITY BUILDING CHANGE COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION COMMUNITY SURVEYS CONFIDENCE CORRUPT CORRUPT OFFICIAL CORRUPTION CRIME CRIMINAL DATA COLLECTION DATA ENTRY DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH DISCRETION DISCUSSIONS ETHICS EXPERIMENTATION FACILITY SURVEYS FAMILY LIFE SURVEYS GOOD GOVERNANCE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS HOUSEHOLD INCOME HOUSEHOLD SURVEYS IMPACT EVALUATION INITIATIVE INTEGRATED APPROACH INTEGRITY INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES INTERVENTION INTERVIEWS INVESTIGATION JUSTICE LAW ENFORCEMENT LAWYERS LEADERSHIP LIVELIHOOD LIVELIHOODS LIVING STANDARDS LIVING STANDARDS MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGIES METHODOLOGY MONITORING DATA NGO OPEN ENDED QUESTIONS OPINION OPINIONS PATRONAGE PERCEPTION PERCEPTIONS POLICE POLITICIANS POVERTY REDUCTION PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAMS PROJECT EVALUATION PROJECT MONITORING PUBLIC OFFICIAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS QUALITATIVE METHODS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH QUANTITATIVE DATA QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONNAIRES RANDOM SAMPLES RELIABILITY RESEARCH METHODS RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS RESEARCH PAPERS RESEARCH PROGRAMS RESEARCHERS RULE OF LAW SAMPLE DESIGN SAMPLE SIZE SAMPLE SURVEYS SATISFACTION SURVEYS SOCIAL ASPECTS SOCIAL CHANGE SOCIAL NORMS SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH SUCCESS INDICATORS SURVEY DATA SURVEY DESIGN SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION SURVEY INSTRUMENTS SURVEY MODULES SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES SURVEY QUESTIONS SURVEY RESULTS SURVEY SAMPLE SURVEYING SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT TARGETING TECHNIQUES TELEPHONE SURVEYS VALIDITY VARIABILITY VIOLENCE WEIGHTING Though household surveys have long been an established part of development practice and regularly used to gather data on poverty incidence and the range of associated indicators, they have not yet become a common tool of justice reform practitioners. This guide aims to be a practical starting point for integrating justice work and household data collection, targeted both towards justice practitioners interested in survey design, as well as survey researchers interested in incorporating justice questions into their work. It provides guidance on designing a survey, suggested topics and questions, and ideas to facilitate a constructive engagement in discussions around justice in development practice. Household survey data can be beneficial to understanding justice questions as household surveys ordinarily cover a large, randomly selected cross-section of people - including the rich and poor, urban and rural dwellers - capturing a population's most common justice issues. Household survey questions commonly ask respondents about their most frequently experienced justice issues, issues when seeking redress, and knowledge and opinions of the law. Household surveys thus complement data collection techniques more familiar to justice practitioners (such as user surveys or sector assessments) that tend to focus on institutions of the justice sector and hence capture only the views of those who manage to access such institutions and privilege the perspectives of system incumbents. Household surveys have their limitations - not least significant cost, time and complexity implications. In addition, the standardized nature of surveys limits the type of information that can be gleaned and hence household surveys are generally most useful for gaining a picture of the "what" when it comes to justice issues, with complementary research methods often needed to properly understand the "why." Nevertheless, surveys can represent a useful starting point for engagement in a particular context, providing a snap shot of the justice landscape from which more detailed qualitative and quantitative studies can be undertaken. 2014-04-28T22:53:24Z 2014-04-28T22:53:24Z 2010-01 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2010/01/12600211/surveying-justice-practical-guide-household-surveys http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18104 English en_US Justice and development working paper series;no. 11 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research :: Working Paper Publications & Research |