Productivity Growth and Product Variety : Gains from Imitation and Education
Is there a correlation between productivity and product variety? Certainly it appears that the rich countries are more productive and have more product variety than the poor nations. In fact, the relationship is quite strong when measured in levels...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/04/2300153/productivity-growth-product-variety-gains-imitation-education http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18252 |
Summary: | Is there a correlation between
productivity and product variety? Certainly it appears that
the rich countries are more productive and have more product
variety than the poor nations. In fact, the relationship is
quite strong when measured in levels. Does this same
correlation hold up when measured in growth rates? If so,
can poor countries imitate the success of the rich? Addison
provides theoretical and empirical reasons to believe the
answer to both questions is yes. Recent economic theory
suggests that rising variety in factor inputs can help avoid
diminishing marginal returns. Product variety can also
sustain learning-by-doing which would otherwise be exhausted
in a fixed number of products. Finally, invention or
imitation adds to the stock of non-rival knowledge. There
have been only two previous empirical tests of the
correlation between growth in product variety and
productivity growth. Both were affirmative but neither
examined a wide range of developing countries and neither
looked deeper to test what might drive product variety. This
research is based on a cross-country sample of 29 countries
(13 rich and 16 poor). The data display a statistically
significant and positive relationship between growth in
product variety and productivity growth when condition on
other variables such as research and development (R&D)
employment, macroeconomic stability, and domestic security.
These results are robust to the addition and subtraction of
various explanatory variables but fragile with respect to an
influential data point for Venezuela. Industrial nations
tend to generate most of their productivity gains through
R&D employment in a stable environment that results in
better production processes and product quality. In
contrast, the largest source of productivity growth in
developing countries is product variety imitation while
instability takes away from productivity. Addison tests
various explanations for growth in variety. The results show
that nations furthest from the frontier of observable
variety tend to imitate fastest, with the ability to imitate
being improved by educational attainment and by productivity
gains. This could be a source of hope for small, less
developed nations. Growth in market size was not correlated
with growth in variety, though this may be due to a rather
short sample period of only eight years. In addition to the
empirical testing, Addison also contributes to a general
discussion of measurement concepts and measurement issues
related to product variety and sets out an agenda for
further research. |
---|