Foreign Aid, Conditionality and Ghost of the Financing Gap : A Forgotten Aspect of the Aid Debate
Assessing Aid: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why (The World Bank, 1998) generated a new wave of controversy about foreign aid and policy conditionality that had seen several decades of intense debate. Much of the recent debate has focused on t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2003/04/2243834/foreign-aid-conditionality-ghost-financing-gap-forgotten-aspect-aid-debate http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18260 |
Summary: | Assessing Aid: What Works, What
Doesn't, and Why (The World Bank, 1998) generated a new
wave of controversy about foreign aid and policy
conditionality that had seen several decades of intense
debate. Much of the recent debate has focused on the
aid-growth relationship and the role of "good"
policies. While a great deal has been said about qualitative
aspects of aid effectiveness (that is, fungibility, among
other things), little attention has been paid so far to some
important quantitative aspects. The author draws attention
to this neglected aspect of the aid debate to show that the
level of aid requirements of a country is an equally
important and integral part of aid and aid effectiveness.
The author compares the World Bank/IMF approaches to
estimation of external assistance requirements of a country
in quantitative terms with an alternative model, the
"balance of payments constrained growth model"
(based on the Harrod trade multiplier). He finds that the
latter model is not a real alternative as it is an
incomplete model. More important, he shows that
international financial institutions use these quantitative
frameworks in a very flexible and pragmatic way to carry on
a meaningful policy dialogue with both donors and recipient
countries, which has an important bearing on aid effectiveness. |
---|