Distinguishing between Observationally Equivalent Theories of Crises
The objective of this paper is to empirically test across alternative, apparently observationally equivalent theories of currency crises. Theories of crises are often difficult to distinguish from each other based on the behavior of commonly used...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2002/11/2075371/distinguishing-between-observationally-equivalent-theories-crises http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19202 |
Summary: | The objective of this paper is to
empirically test across alternative, apparently
observationally equivalent theories of currency crises.
Theories of crises are often difficult to distinguish from
each other based on the behavior of commonly used
predictors. Using a comprehensive data set on gross external
assets and liabilities for 167 countries created by the
World Bank's Latin America and the Caribbean Region and
the Development Research Group, this study is able to make a
significant move toward redressing this shortcoming. It
focuses on identifying potential crisis predictors, as well
as testing the validity of the distinct transmission
mechanisms implied by various theories of currency crisis.
Evidence is presented in support of insurance-based models,
suggesting that proxies for contingent liability
accumulation are effective crisis predictors. |
---|