Public versus Private Ownership : The Current State of the Debate
At the heart of the debate about public versus private ownership lie three questions: 1) Does competition matter more than ownership? 2) Are state enterprises more subject to welfare-reducing interventions by government than private firms are? 3) D...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2000/08/693336/public-versus-private-ownership-current-state-debate http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19806 |
Summary: | At the heart of the debate about public
versus private ownership lie three questions: 1) Does
competition matter more than ownership? 2) Are state
enterprises more subject to welfare-reducing interventions
by government than private firms are? 3) Do state
enterprises suffer more from governance problems than
private firms do? Even if the answers to these questions
favor private ownership, the question must still be asked:
Do distortions in the process of privatization mean that
privatized firms perform worse than state enterprises? The
author's review found greater ambiguity about the
merits of privatization and private ownership in the
theoretical literature than in the empirical literature. In
most cases, empirical research strongly favors private
ownership in competitive markets over a state-owned
counterfactual (although construction of the counterfactual
is itself a problem). Theory's ambiguity about
ownership in monopoly markets seems better justified. Since
the choice confronting governments is between state
ownership and privatization rather than between
privatization and optimality, theory has left a gap that
empirical work has tried to fill. Further research is needed. |
---|