Household Coping and Response to Government Stimulus in an Economic Crisis : Evidence from Thailand
The crash of global financial markets in 2008 caused a ripple effect on economic demand and growth worldwide. Export-oriented economies were hit particularly hard, and many governments stepped in quickly with broad-ranging stimulus programs to less...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Policy Research Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2012/03/15981093/household-coping-response-government-stimulus-economic-crisis-evidence-thailand http://hdl.handle.net/10986/19865 |
Summary: | The crash of global financial markets in
2008 caused a ripple effect on economic demand and growth
worldwide. Export-oriented economies were hit particularly
hard, and many governments stepped in quickly with
broad-ranging stimulus programs to lessen the effects on
households of rising unemployment and falling income. To
better understand the role that stimulus policy might play
in softening the effects of these shocks, this paper
examines recent nationally-representative data from
Thailand, an export-dependent economy where a large-scale
stimulus program was introduced in 2009. Using monthly data
spanning 2006-2010, the paper uses sub-province-level
community panel data to examine the effects of major
components of the stimulus on household consumption, income,
borrowing, and debt repaid. To address simultaneity of
changes in government spending and household outcomes, the
analysis estimates a dynamic panel regression, instrumenting
the stimulus effect with second-order lagged outcome
variables, and estimating the model using the Generalized
Method of Moments. The results suggest that household
participation in these programs helped smooth consumption.
This increase in monthly consumption was not supported from
household receipts from the government stimulus, but more
likely through a reallocation of consumption and savings
that included greater debt repayment. The paper typically
finds stronger effects in urban compared with rural areas. |
---|