MENA Economic and Development Prospects 2013 : Investing in Turbulent Times
The political and social upheavals that followed the Arab Spring of 2011 continue to dominate economic activity and near term prospects in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Although political transitions bring promises of greater political a...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Brief |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/11/18729025/mena-economic-development-prospects-2013-investing-turbulent-times http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20562 |
| Summary: | The political and social upheavals that
followed the Arab Spring of 2011 continue to dominate
economic activity and near term prospects in the Middle East
and North Africa (MENA). Although political transitions
bring promises of greater political and economic freedom, in
MENA the process remains far from complete and has been
accompanied by increased political and macroeconomic
instability in 2013. In Egypt, rising social and political
tensions weighed heavily on confidence. In Syria, a marked
escalation of the civil war exacted a heavy economic and
human toll, with spillovers to neighboring Lebanon, Jordan,
and Iraq. Oil production in developing MENA oil exporters
has fallen because of security setbacks, infrastructure
problems, strikes, and in the case of Iran, economic
sanctions. The outlook for 2013-and more so for 2014, is
uncertain and subject to a variety of risks, mostly domestic
in nature and linked to political instability, while global
economic conditions have become more favorable. In 2013,
economic growth is expected to remain weak or weaken
relative to 2012 across MENA and average 2.8 percent, down
from the estimated 5.6 percent in 2012. Growth has been most
volatile in the MENA's developing oil exporting
countries, and is projected to slow down considerably due to
unfavorable developments, especially in Libya, Iran, and
Syria. Some aspects of instability, including the quality
and stability of government institutions and policies, did
play a role, but others, such as democratic accountability,
did not. Furthermore, Foreign Trade Investment (FDI) flows
to the resource intensive and non-tradable sectors appear
immune to political instability, but FDI flows to the
tradable sectors exhibit a clear negative response. |
|---|