Romania Judicial Functional Review
This review is one of a series of functional reviews commissioned by the Government of Romania (GOR), funded by the European Union, and carried out by the World Bank. It is an element agreed on by the European Union and the Government as part of th...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
Washington, DC
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/20329626/romania-judicial-functional-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20808 |
| id |
okr-10986-20808 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English en_US |
| topic |
ABUSE ABUSES ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACCESSION ACCOUNTABILITY ACRONYMS ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ANNUAL REPORTS ANTI-CORRUPTION ANTICORRUPTION APPELLATE COURTS ARBITRATION ARRANGEMENTS ATTORNEYS BAILIFFS BAR ASSOCIATIONS BENCHMARKS BRIBE BRIBES BUSINESS PROCESS CAPABILITIES CAPITAL INVESTMENTS CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE CLASSIFICATION COLLAPSE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY COMPENSATION COMPLAINT COMPLAINTS CONFIDENCE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CONTENTS CONVICTIONS CORRUPT COURT COURT PROCEEDINGS COURT RECORDS COURTS CRIME CRIMES CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASES CRIMINAL PROCEDURES DATA WAREHOUSE DETENTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION DISTRICT COURTS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT ELECTRONIC FILING ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE ENTRIES ENTRY EU FAIR TRIAL FILINGS FINANCIAL RESOURCE FINANCIAL RESOURCES GENERAL PUBLIC GOVERNMENT POLICIES HARDWARE HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY HUMAN RESOURCES HUMAN RIGHTS ICT INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION INTEGRATION INFORMATION SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM INITIATIVE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS INTEROPERABILITY INVENTORY INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATIONS JUDGE JUDGES JUDGMENTS JUDICIAL CORRUPTION JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS JUDICIAL REFORM JUDICIAL SERVICE JUDICIAL SERVICES JUDICIAL SYSTEM JUDICIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE JUDICIARY JURISDICTION JUSTICE LAWS LAWYER LAWYERS LEGAL AID LEGAL ASSISTANCE LEGAL CHANGES LEGAL COUNSEL LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL INTERPRETATION LEGAL PROFESSIONALS LEGAL REFORM LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SYSTEM LEGALITY LEGISLATION LITIGATION LOGIC MAGISTRATES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MEDIATION MILITARY COURTS MINISTER MINISTERS NATIONAL INTEGRITY NOTARIES ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS PENSION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PRISONS PRIVATE SECTOR PRODUCTIVITY PROSECUTION PROSECUTOR PROSECUTORS PROTOCOLS REGISTRY REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS REMEDIES RESULT RESULTS SANCTIONS SEARCH SECURITY POLICY SENTENCES SERVICE DELIVERY SOCIAL SECURITY STATE COURTS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT TARGETS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TERRORISM TIME FRAME TIME PERIOD TRANSPARENCY TRIALS TRIBUNALS USER USER GROUPS USER TRAINING USERS VERIFICATION VICTIMS WILL WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT |
| spellingShingle |
ABUSE ABUSES ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACCESSION ACCOUNTABILITY ACRONYMS ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ANNUAL REPORTS ANTI-CORRUPTION ANTICORRUPTION APPELLATE COURTS ARBITRATION ARRANGEMENTS ATTORNEYS BAILIFFS BAR ASSOCIATIONS BENCHMARKS BRIBE BRIBES BUSINESS PROCESS CAPABILITIES CAPITAL INVESTMENTS CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE CLASSIFICATION COLLAPSE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY COMPENSATION COMPLAINT COMPLAINTS CONFIDENCE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CONTENTS CONVICTIONS CORRUPT COURT COURT PROCEEDINGS COURT RECORDS COURTS CRIME CRIMES CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASES CRIMINAL PROCEDURES DATA WAREHOUSE DETENTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION DISTRICT COURTS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT ELECTRONIC FILING ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE ENTRIES ENTRY EU FAIR TRIAL FILINGS FINANCIAL RESOURCE FINANCIAL RESOURCES GENERAL PUBLIC GOVERNMENT POLICIES HARDWARE HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY HUMAN RESOURCES HUMAN RIGHTS ICT INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION INTEGRATION INFORMATION SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM INITIATIVE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS INTEROPERABILITY INVENTORY INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATIONS JUDGE JUDGES JUDGMENTS JUDICIAL CORRUPTION JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS JUDICIAL REFORM JUDICIAL SERVICE JUDICIAL SERVICES JUDICIAL SYSTEM JUDICIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE JUDICIARY JURISDICTION JUSTICE LAWS LAWYER LAWYERS LEGAL AID LEGAL ASSISTANCE LEGAL CHANGES LEGAL COUNSEL LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL INTERPRETATION LEGAL PROFESSIONALS LEGAL REFORM LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SYSTEM LEGALITY LEGISLATION LITIGATION LOGIC MAGISTRATES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MEDIATION MILITARY COURTS MINISTER MINISTERS NATIONAL INTEGRITY NOTARIES ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS PENSION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PRISONS PRIVATE SECTOR PRODUCTIVITY PROSECUTION PROSECUTOR PROSECUTORS PROTOCOLS REGISTRY REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS REMEDIES RESULT RESULTS SANCTIONS SEARCH SECURITY POLICY SENTENCES SERVICE DELIVERY SOCIAL SECURITY STATE COURTS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT TARGETS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TERRORISM TIME FRAME TIME PERIOD TRANSPARENCY TRIALS TRIBUNALS USER USER GROUPS USER TRAINING USERS VERIFICATION VICTIMS WILL WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT World Bank Romania Judicial Functional Review |
| geographic_facet |
Europe and Central Asia Romania |
| description |
This review is one of a series of
functional reviews commissioned by the Government of Romania
(GOR), funded by the European Union, and carried out by the
World Bank. It is an element agreed on by the European Union
and the Government as part of the post-accession Cooperation
and Verification Mechanism (CVM) established to assess
further need for reform in the judicial system and to
suggest reforms that would ensure Romania's full
integration into the European Union system. The objective of
the review is to analyze the functioning of institutions of
the judicial system in Romania with a view to providing
analytical and advisory input to the Romanian authorities as
they formulate an action program to improve the performance
of the judicial system. The present report covers a large
part of Romania's judicial system, a term used here
with broad scope. In accord with the terms of reference
(appendix one), in addition to the courts, the review covers
the Ministry of Justice, focusing on those functions most
directly related to the judiciary and to the Public Ministry
(PM), the PM itself, and a range of independent legal
professionals whose work complements and in some cases
replaces that of judges and prosecutors. Within the
judiciary, aside from the ordinary courts, the review also
addressed the operations of the Superior Council of
Magistracy, the Judicial Inspectorate, and the High Court of
Cassation and Justice, all of which operate
quasi-independently. They have their own budgets and
administrative structures, although are still governed by
laws on staffing set by Parliament and staffing levels
approved by the cabinet. Within the PM, the team also looked
at the quasi-independent National Anti-Corruption Directorate. |
| format |
Economic & Sector Work :: Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment |
| author |
World Bank |
| author_facet |
World Bank |
| author_sort |
World Bank |
| title |
Romania Judicial Functional Review |
| title_short |
Romania Judicial Functional Review |
| title_full |
Romania Judicial Functional Review |
| title_fullStr |
Romania Judicial Functional Review |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Romania Judicial Functional Review |
| title_sort |
romania judicial functional review |
| publisher |
Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/20329626/romania-judicial-functional-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20808 |
| _version_ |
1764447118417723392 |
| spelling |
okr-10986-208082021-04-23T14:03:59Z Romania Judicial Functional Review World Bank ABUSE ABUSES ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACCESSION ACCOUNTABILITY ACRONYMS ADMINISTRATIVE COURTS ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION ANNUAL REPORTS ANTI-CORRUPTION ANTICORRUPTION APPELLATE COURTS ARBITRATION ARRANGEMENTS ATTORNEYS BAILIFFS BAR ASSOCIATIONS BENCHMARKS BRIBE BRIBES BUSINESS PROCESS CAPABILITIES CAPITAL INVESTMENTS CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE CLASSIFICATION COLLAPSE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY COMPENSATION COMPLAINT COMPLAINTS CONFIDENCE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT CONTENTS CONVICTIONS CORRUPT COURT COURT PROCEEDINGS COURT RECORDS COURTS CRIME CRIMES CRIMINAL CRIMINAL CASES CRIMINAL PROCEDURES DATA WAREHOUSE DETENTION DISPUTE RESOLUTION DISTRICT COURTS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT DOCUMENTS ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT ELECTRONIC FILING ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE ENTRIES ENTRY EU FAIR TRIAL FILINGS FINANCIAL RESOURCE FINANCIAL RESOURCES GENERAL PUBLIC GOVERNMENT POLICIES HARDWARE HUMAN RESOURCE HUMAN RESOURCE CAPACITY HUMAN RESOURCES HUMAN RIGHTS ICT INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY INFORMATION INTEGRATION INFORMATION SERVICES INFORMATION SYSTEM INITIATIVE INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS INTEROPERABILITY INVENTORY INVESTIGATION INVESTIGATIONS JUDGE JUDGES JUDGMENTS JUDICIAL CORRUPTION JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE JUDICIAL INSTITUTIONS JUDICIAL REFORM JUDICIAL SERVICE JUDICIAL SERVICES JUDICIAL SYSTEM JUDICIAL SYSTEM PERFORMANCE JUDICIARY JURISDICTION JUSTICE LAWS LAWYER LAWYERS LEGAL AID LEGAL ASSISTANCE LEGAL CHANGES LEGAL COUNSEL LEGAL FRAMEWORK LEGAL INTERPRETATION LEGAL PROFESSIONALS LEGAL REFORM LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SYSTEM LEGALITY LEGISLATION LITIGATION LOGIC MAGISTRATES MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MEDIATION MILITARY COURTS MINISTER MINISTERS NATIONAL INTEGRITY NOTARIES ORGANIZATIONAL SYSTEMS PENSION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PRISONS PRIVATE SECTOR PRODUCTIVITY PROSECUTION PROSECUTOR PROSECUTORS PROTOCOLS REGISTRY REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS REMEDIES RESULT RESULTS SANCTIONS SEARCH SECURITY POLICY SENTENCES SERVICE DELIVERY SOCIAL SECURITY STATE COURTS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT TARGETS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TERRORISM TIME FRAME TIME PERIOD TRANSPARENCY TRIALS TRIBUNALS USER USER GROUPS USER TRAINING USERS VERIFICATION VICTIMS WILL WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT This review is one of a series of functional reviews commissioned by the Government of Romania (GOR), funded by the European Union, and carried out by the World Bank. It is an element agreed on by the European Union and the Government as part of the post-accession Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) established to assess further need for reform in the judicial system and to suggest reforms that would ensure Romania's full integration into the European Union system. The objective of the review is to analyze the functioning of institutions of the judicial system in Romania with a view to providing analytical and advisory input to the Romanian authorities as they formulate an action program to improve the performance of the judicial system. The present report covers a large part of Romania's judicial system, a term used here with broad scope. In accord with the terms of reference (appendix one), in addition to the courts, the review covers the Ministry of Justice, focusing on those functions most directly related to the judiciary and to the Public Ministry (PM), the PM itself, and a range of independent legal professionals whose work complements and in some cases replaces that of judges and prosecutors. Within the judiciary, aside from the ordinary courts, the review also addressed the operations of the Superior Council of Magistracy, the Judicial Inspectorate, and the High Court of Cassation and Justice, all of which operate quasi-independently. They have their own budgets and administrative structures, although are still governed by laws on staffing set by Parliament and staffing levels approved by the cabinet. Within the PM, the team also looked at the quasi-independent National Anti-Corruption Directorate. 2014-12-18T21:25:18Z 2014-12-18T21:25:18Z 2013-03 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2013/03/20329626/romania-judicial-functional-review http://hdl.handle.net/10986/20808 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Legal and Judicial Sector Assessment Europe and Central Asia Romania |