Monitoring and Evaluation System : The Case of Chile 1990-2014
From its creation in the 1990s, the Chilean monitoring and evaluation (M and E) system has represented a substantial part of the effort to improve the use of Chile's public resources within a broader context of multiple initiatives designed to...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Publications & Research |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
Washington, DC: World Bank Group
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/07/23610465/monitoring-evaluation-system-case-chile-1990-2014 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21313 |
| id |
okr-10986-21313 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| spelling |
okr-10986-213132021-04-23T14:04:01Z Monitoring and Evaluation System : The Case of Chile 1990-2014 Guzman, Marcela Irarrazaval, Ignacio de los Rios, Boris ABSENTEEISM ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACCESS TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ALGORITHMS APPLICATION OF INFORMATION AUDITING AUDITS BASIC BENEFICIARIES BUDGET ALLOCATIONS CAPACITY BUILDING COMMUNICATION MEDIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA COMPARISON GROUPS COMPONENTS CONNECTIVITY CONTROL GROUPS CONTROL SYSTEM COORDINATION MECHANISMS DECISION MAKING PROCESS DELIVERY OF GOODS DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DOMAIN E-MAIL ECONOMICS EMPLOYMENT EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EX POST EVALUATION EX POST IMPACT EVALUATION FACSIMILE FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FINANCIAL RESOURCES FLEXIBILITY GENERAL PUBLIC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS GOVERNMENT POLICIES GROUP INTERVIEWS IMPACT MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION PROCESSES IMPLEMENTATION STAGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS INSTALLATION INSTITUTION INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIES INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT LEARNING LEGAL FRAMEWORK M&E MECHANISMS M&E SYSTEMS M&E TOOLS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MONITORING MECHANISMS MONITORING TOOLS MOTIVATION NATIONAL TRAINING OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OUTCOME INDICATORS OUTPUTS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MONITORING PROCESS INDICATORS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OUTCOMES PROTOCOL PROTOCOLS PUBLIC ACTIONS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC POLICIES PUBLISHING REGISTERS REGISTRY RELIABILITY RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESULT SAFETY SEARCH SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL POLICIES SOCIAL PROGRAMS SOCIAL SERVICES SUPERVISION TARGETS TAXONOMY TECHNICAL ASPECTS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS TECHNICAL SUPPORT TELEPHONE TRACKING SYSTEM TRANSPARENCY USABILITY USES VALUE CHAIN WEB WEBSITE From its creation in the 1990s, the Chilean monitoring and evaluation (M and E) system has represented a substantial part of the effort to improve the use of Chile's public resources within a broader context of multiple initiatives designed to modernize and improve public management in many areas. This close relationship with the budget has determined the primary characteristics of the M and E system, in both its design and operations. The M and E system's institutional coverage includes all the organizations in the executive branch of the central government and those included in the budget law for the public sector. The objective of this document is to give a broad view of the M and E systems in Chile, distinguishing the three stages and providing lessons for other countries that are developing their own systems. The first section focuses on the first period and its two stages: 1990-2000 and 2000-2010. These stages concentrate mainly on the role played by the budget office. The second period covers 2010-13, in which light is shed on both the new system's actors and the emphasis adopted by the authorities in charge, but at the same time the authorities largely continue and strengthen the existing tools from the M and E system of the previous period. The third section of the paper summarizes success factors and obstacles to success in the two periods. Section four states general conclusions regarding the main system's challenges and section five includes lessons for other countries. 2015-01-20T23:31:24Z 2015-01-20T23:31:24Z 2014-07 http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/07/23610465/monitoring-evaluation-system-case-chile-1990-2014 978-1-60244-246-7 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21313 English en_US Evaluation Capacity Development (ECD) working paper series;no. 29 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ Washington, DC: World Bank Group Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Publication Latin America & Caribbean Chile |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English en_US |
| topic |
ABSENTEEISM ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACCESS TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ALGORITHMS APPLICATION OF INFORMATION AUDITING AUDITS BASIC BENEFICIARIES BUDGET ALLOCATIONS CAPACITY BUILDING COMMUNICATION MEDIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA COMPARISON GROUPS COMPONENTS CONNECTIVITY CONTROL GROUPS CONTROL SYSTEM COORDINATION MECHANISMS DECISION MAKING PROCESS DELIVERY OF GOODS DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DOMAIN ECONOMICS EMPLOYMENT EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EX POST EVALUATION EX POST IMPACT EVALUATION FACSIMILE FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FINANCIAL RESOURCES FLEXIBILITY GENERAL PUBLIC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS GOVERNMENT POLICIES GROUP INTERVIEWS IMPACT MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION PROCESSES IMPLEMENTATION STAGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS INSTALLATION INSTITUTION INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIES INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT LEARNING LEGAL FRAMEWORK M&E MECHANISMS M&E SYSTEMS M&E TOOLS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MONITORING MECHANISMS MONITORING TOOLS MOTIVATION NATIONAL TRAINING OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OUTCOME INDICATORS OUTPUTS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MONITORING PROCESS INDICATORS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OUTCOMES PROTOCOL PROTOCOLS PUBLIC ACTIONS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC POLICIES PUBLISHING REGISTERS REGISTRY RELIABILITY RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESULT SAFETY SEARCH SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL POLICIES SOCIAL PROGRAMS SOCIAL SERVICES SUPERVISION TARGETS TAXONOMY TECHNICAL ASPECTS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS TECHNICAL SUPPORT TELEPHONE TRACKING SYSTEM TRANSPARENCY USABILITY USES VALUE CHAIN WEB WEBSITE |
| spellingShingle |
ABSENTEEISM ACCESS TO INFORMATION ACCESS TO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCOUNTABILITY ACCOUNTING ALGORITHMS APPLICATION OF INFORMATION AUDITING AUDITS BASIC BENEFICIARIES BUDGET ALLOCATIONS CAPACITY BUILDING COMMUNICATION MEDIA COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES COMMUNICATIONS MEDIA COMPARISON GROUPS COMPONENTS CONNECTIVITY CONTROL GROUPS CONTROL SYSTEM COORDINATION MECHANISMS DECISION MAKING PROCESS DELIVERY OF GOODS DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DOMAIN ECONOMICS EMPLOYMENT EVALUATION CAPACITY EVALUATION RESULTS EVALUATORS EX POST EVALUATION EX POST IMPACT EVALUATION FACSIMILE FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATION FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FINANCIAL RESOURCES FLEXIBILITY GENERAL PUBLIC GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS GOVERNMENT POLICIES GROUP INTERVIEWS IMPACT MONITORING IMPLEMENTATION PROCESSES IMPLEMENTATION STAGE INFORMATION SYSTEMS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES INNOVATIONS INSTALLATION INSTITUTION INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITIES INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL CONSULTANT KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT LEARNING LEGAL FRAMEWORK M&E MECHANISMS M&E SYSTEMS M&E TOOLS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM MONITORING MECHANISMS MONITORING TOOLS MOTIVATION NATIONAL TRAINING OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS ORGANIZATION OF INFORMATION ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OUTCOME INDICATORS OUTPUTS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS PERFORMANCE MONITORING PROCESS INDICATORS PROGRAM EVALUATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM OUTCOMES PROTOCOL PROTOCOLS PUBLIC ACTIONS PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC POLICIES PUBLISHING REGISTERS REGISTRY RELIABILITY RESOURCE ALLOCATION RESULT SAFETY SEARCH SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT SOCIAL POLICIES SOCIAL PROGRAMS SOCIAL SERVICES SUPERVISION TARGETS TAXONOMY TECHNICAL ASPECTS TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS TECHNICAL SUPPORT TELEPHONE TRACKING SYSTEM TRANSPARENCY USABILITY USES VALUE CHAIN WEB WEBSITE Guzman, Marcela Irarrazaval, Ignacio de los Rios, Boris Monitoring and Evaluation System : The Case of Chile 1990-2014 |
| geographic_facet |
Latin America & Caribbean Chile |
| relation |
Evaluation Capacity Development (ECD)
working paper series;no. 29 |
| description |
From its creation in the 1990s, the
Chilean monitoring and evaluation (M and E) system has
represented a substantial part of the effort to improve the
use of Chile's public resources within a broader
context of multiple initiatives designed to modernize and
improve public management in many areas. This close
relationship with the budget has determined the primary
characteristics of the M and E system, in both its design
and operations. The M and E system's institutional
coverage includes all the organizations in the executive
branch of the central government and those included in the
budget law for the public sector. The objective of this
document is to give a broad view of the M and E systems in
Chile, distinguishing the three stages and providing lessons
for other countries that are developing their own systems.
The first section focuses on the first period and its two
stages: 1990-2000 and 2000-2010. These stages concentrate
mainly on the role played by the budget office. The second
period covers 2010-13, in which light is shed on both the
new system's actors and the emphasis adopted by the
authorities in charge, but at the same time the authorities
largely continue and strengthen the existing tools from the
M and E system of the previous period. The third section of
the paper summarizes success factors and obstacles to
success in the two periods. Section four states general
conclusions regarding the main system's challenges and
section five includes lessons for other countries. |
| format |
Publications & Research |
| author |
Guzman, Marcela Irarrazaval, Ignacio de los Rios, Boris |
| author_facet |
Guzman, Marcela Irarrazaval, Ignacio de los Rios, Boris |
| author_sort |
Guzman, Marcela |
| title |
Monitoring and Evaluation System : The Case of Chile 1990-2014 |
| title_short |
Monitoring and Evaluation System : The Case of Chile 1990-2014 |
| title_full |
Monitoring and Evaluation System : The Case of Chile 1990-2014 |
| title_fullStr |
Monitoring and Evaluation System : The Case of Chile 1990-2014 |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Monitoring and Evaluation System : The Case of Chile 1990-2014 |
| title_sort |
monitoring and evaluation system : the case of chile 1990-2014 |
| publisher |
Washington, DC: World Bank Group |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/07/23610465/monitoring-evaluation-system-case-chile-1990-2014 http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21313 |
| _version_ |
1764447909037735936 |