Fossil Fuel Subsidies : Approaches and Valuation

Numbers ranging from half a trillion to two trillion dollars have been cited in recent years for global subsidies for fossil fuels. How are these figures calculated and why are they so different? The most commonly used methods for measuring subsidies are the price-gap approach -- quantifying the gap...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kojima, Masami, Koplow, Doug
Format: Working Paper
Language:en_US
Published: World Bank Group, Washington, DC 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21659
id okr-10986-21659
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-216592021-04-23T14:04:03Z Fossil Fuel Subsidies : Approaches and Valuation Kojima, Masami Koplow, Doug fossil fuels oil gas coal subsidies price gap inventory producer support estimate consumer support estimate total support estimate OECD International Energy Agency International Monetary Fund Numbers ranging from half a trillion to two trillion dollars have been cited in recent years for global subsidies for fossil fuels. How are these figures calculated and why are they so different? The most commonly used methods for measuring subsidies are the price-gap approach -- quantifying the gap between free-market reference prices and the prices charged to consumers -- the inventory approach, which constructs an inventory of government actions benefiting production and consumption of fossil fuels. Practitioners are not faced with two choices. The two methods are complementary and should be used together -- price gaps cause distortions throughout the economy and quantification is needed for improving pricing policies; an inventory is useful for examining budgetary allocation. An inventory based on a full accounting framework for producer and consumer support estimates in fact captures price gaps as market transfers to producers or consumers. Differences in subsidy valuation arise from assumptions made to compensate for missing data and the scope of subsidy measurement. Having a common understanding of terms and standardizing calculation methods would go a long way in enabling comparison of subsidies across countries and sectors, benchmarking pricing, and assessing subsidy policies. Subsidy measurement should not be viewed as a one-off exercise to inform subsidy reform strategies. Just as subsidy reform in many countries does not have a clear end but is a continuous process of adjustment, so too is subsidy tracking. Devoting resources to data collection and analysis to track subsidies on a continuous basis can bring rich dividends by increasing transparency and enabling informed decisions. 2015-03-31T16:59:34Z 2015-03-31T16:59:34Z 2015-03 Working Paper http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21659 en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7220 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank Group, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language en_US
topic fossil fuels
oil
gas
coal
subsidies
price gap
inventory
producer support estimate
consumer support estimate
total support estimate
OECD
International Energy Agency
International Monetary Fund
spellingShingle fossil fuels
oil
gas
coal
subsidies
price gap
inventory
producer support estimate
consumer support estimate
total support estimate
OECD
International Energy Agency
International Monetary Fund
Kojima, Masami
Koplow, Doug
Fossil Fuel Subsidies : Approaches and Valuation
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7220
description Numbers ranging from half a trillion to two trillion dollars have been cited in recent years for global subsidies for fossil fuels. How are these figures calculated and why are they so different? The most commonly used methods for measuring subsidies are the price-gap approach -- quantifying the gap between free-market reference prices and the prices charged to consumers -- the inventory approach, which constructs an inventory of government actions benefiting production and consumption of fossil fuels. Practitioners are not faced with two choices. The two methods are complementary and should be used together -- price gaps cause distortions throughout the economy and quantification is needed for improving pricing policies; an inventory is useful for examining budgetary allocation. An inventory based on a full accounting framework for producer and consumer support estimates in fact captures price gaps as market transfers to producers or consumers. Differences in subsidy valuation arise from assumptions made to compensate for missing data and the scope of subsidy measurement. Having a common understanding of terms and standardizing calculation methods would go a long way in enabling comparison of subsidies across countries and sectors, benchmarking pricing, and assessing subsidy policies. Subsidy measurement should not be viewed as a one-off exercise to inform subsidy reform strategies. Just as subsidy reform in many countries does not have a clear end but is a continuous process of adjustment, so too is subsidy tracking. Devoting resources to data collection and analysis to track subsidies on a continuous basis can bring rich dividends by increasing transparency and enabling informed decisions.
format Working Paper
author Kojima, Masami
Koplow, Doug
author_facet Kojima, Masami
Koplow, Doug
author_sort Kojima, Masami
title Fossil Fuel Subsidies : Approaches and Valuation
title_short Fossil Fuel Subsidies : Approaches and Valuation
title_full Fossil Fuel Subsidies : Approaches and Valuation
title_fullStr Fossil Fuel Subsidies : Approaches and Valuation
title_full_unstemmed Fossil Fuel Subsidies : Approaches and Valuation
title_sort fossil fuel subsidies : approaches and valuation
publisher World Bank Group, Washington, DC
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21659
_version_ 1764448904651210752