Side by Side with People : Korea's Experience on Participatory Auditing
The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea (hereinafter referred to as BAI) has gradually expanded the dimensions of its cooperative relationship with the citizenry since its establishment. The BAI has gone through the information and consultation...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Working Paper |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank Group, Washington, DC
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/01/24166192/side-side-people-koreas-experience-participatory-auditing http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21675 |
| id |
okr-10986-21675 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| spelling |
okr-10986-216752021-04-23T14:04:04Z Side by Side with People : Korea's Experience on Participatory Auditing Kim, Seongjun ABUSE ACCOUNTING ACTIVE PARTICIPATION ADJUDICATION ANTI-CORRUPTION AREAS OF EXPERTISE AUDITORS AUDITS BEHAVIORS BUDGET CYCLE BUSINESS COMMUNITY CAPACITY BUILDING CITIZEN EMPOWERMENT CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS CLIENT COUNTRIES COLLABORATION COMPLAINT COMPLAINTS COMPLEXITY CONFIDENCE CORRUPTION CORRUPTION ACT DEBT DECENTRALIZATION DECISION-MAKING DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISCRETION DOCUMENTS ELECTION ENTRY POINTS ETHICAL STANDARDS ETHICS EXECUTIVE BRANCH FINANCE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL RISK FRAUD GOOD PRACTICE GOVERNORS INITIATIVE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION INVESTIGATION JURISDICTION LAWS LAWYERS LEADING LEARNING LEGAL FRAMEWORK MEDIA MISMANAGEMENT MORAL HAZARD OUTREACH PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES PARLIAMENTS PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY PARTISAN REASONS POLITICAL INTERESTS POLITICAL OPPONENTS PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC GOOD PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INTEREST PUBLIC MONEY PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PUBLIC POLICIES PUBLIC SERVANTS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICES RESEARCH COMMUNITY SERVICE DELIVERY SOCIAL CAPITAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSPARENCY TRIAL WORKING RELATIONSHIPS The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea (hereinafter referred to as BAI) has gradually expanded the dimensions of its cooperative relationship with the citizenry since its establishment. The BAI has gone through the information and consultation stages and has now reached the stage of partnership for decision-making with citizens.1 The BAI takes advice on its audit direction and formally receives audit requests from the citizens. In addition it takes tips on fraud, waste, or mismanagement of public funds along with civil petitions and complaints from the citizens. The BAI also makes all audit reports available to the citizenry through its website. The fact that the BAI annually receives over ten thousand petitions or complaints from the citizenry and the business community well reflects the significance of this cooperative relationship. The BAI also receives about 200 audit requests per year from Korea s citizens. This paper addresses three key issues associated with the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) s engagement with citizens based on the BAI s varied cooperation experiences with citizens: i) the values and benefits of SAI s engagement with citizens; ii) the potential risks; and iii) practical approaches to ensure the identified values and benefits while controlling the risks. 2015-04-02T19:04:28Z 2015-04-02T19:04:28Z 2015 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/01/24166192/side-side-people-koreas-experience-participatory-auditing http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21675 English en_US Public Participation in the Budget and Audit Process (PPBA) learning note;no. 1 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo/ World Bank World Bank Group, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Working Paper East Asia and Pacific Korea, Republic of |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English en_US |
| topic |
ABUSE ACCOUNTING ACTIVE PARTICIPATION ADJUDICATION ANTI-CORRUPTION AREAS OF EXPERTISE AUDITORS AUDITS BEHAVIORS BUDGET CYCLE BUSINESS COMMUNITY CAPACITY BUILDING CITIZEN EMPOWERMENT CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS CLIENT COUNTRIES COLLABORATION COMPLAINT COMPLAINTS COMPLEXITY CONFIDENCE CORRUPTION CORRUPTION ACT DEBT DECENTRALIZATION DECISION-MAKING DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISCRETION DOCUMENTS ELECTION ENTRY POINTS ETHICAL STANDARDS ETHICS EXECUTIVE BRANCH FINANCE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL RISK FRAUD GOOD PRACTICE GOVERNORS INITIATIVE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION INVESTIGATION JURISDICTION LAWS LAWYERS LEADING LEARNING LEGAL FRAMEWORK MEDIA MISMANAGEMENT MORAL HAZARD OUTREACH PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES PARLIAMENTS PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY PARTISAN REASONS POLITICAL INTERESTS POLITICAL OPPONENTS PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC GOOD PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INTEREST PUBLIC MONEY PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PUBLIC POLICIES PUBLIC SERVANTS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICES RESEARCH COMMUNITY SERVICE DELIVERY SOCIAL CAPITAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSPARENCY TRIAL WORKING RELATIONSHIPS |
| spellingShingle |
ABUSE ACCOUNTING ACTIVE PARTICIPATION ADJUDICATION ANTI-CORRUPTION AREAS OF EXPERTISE AUDITORS AUDITS BEHAVIORS BUDGET CYCLE BUSINESS COMMUNITY CAPACITY BUILDING CITIZEN EMPOWERMENT CITIZEN ENGAGEMENT CITIZEN PARTICIPATION CIVIL SOCIETY CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS CLIENT COUNTRIES COLLABORATION COMPLAINT COMPLAINTS COMPLEXITY CONFIDENCE CORRUPTION CORRUPTION ACT DEBT DECENTRALIZATION DECISION-MAKING DEVELOPING COUNTRIES DISCRETION DOCUMENTS ELECTION ENTRY POINTS ETHICAL STANDARDS ETHICS EXECUTIVE BRANCH FINANCE MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL RISK FRAUD GOOD PRACTICE GOVERNORS INITIATIVE INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION INVESTIGATION JURISDICTION LAWS LAWYERS LEADING LEARNING LEGAL FRAMEWORK MEDIA MISMANAGEMENT MORAL HAZARD OUTREACH PARLIAMENTARY COMMITTEES PARLIAMENTS PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY PARTISAN REASONS POLITICAL INTERESTS POLITICAL OPPONENTS PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY PUBLIC FINANCE PUBLIC FUNDS PUBLIC GOOD PUBLIC INFORMATION PUBLIC INTEREST PUBLIC MONEY PUBLIC OFFICIALS PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PUBLIC POLICIES PUBLIC SERVANTS PUBLIC SERVICE PUBLIC SERVICES RESEARCH COMMUNITY SERVICE DELIVERY SOCIAL CAPITAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TRANSPARENCY TRIAL WORKING RELATIONSHIPS Kim, Seongjun Side by Side with People : Korea's Experience on Participatory Auditing |
| geographic_facet |
East Asia and Pacific Korea, Republic of |
| relation |
Public Participation in the Budget and Audit
Process (PPBA) learning note;no. 1 |
| description |
The Board of Audit and Inspection of
Korea (hereinafter referred to as BAI) has gradually
expanded the dimensions of its cooperative relationship with
the citizenry since its establishment. The BAI has gone
through the information and consultation stages and has now
reached the stage of partnership for decision-making with
citizens.1 The BAI takes advice on its audit direction and
formally receives audit requests from the citizens. In
addition it takes tips on fraud, waste, or mismanagement of
public funds along with civil petitions and complaints from
the citizens. The BAI also makes all audit reports available
to the citizenry through its website. The fact that the BAI
annually receives over ten thousand petitions or complaints
from the citizenry and the business community well reflects
the significance of this cooperative relationship. The BAI
also receives about 200 audit requests per year from Korea s
citizens. This paper addresses three key issues associated
with the Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) s engagement with
citizens based on the BAI s varied cooperation experiences
with citizens: i) the values and benefits of SAI s
engagement with citizens; ii) the potential risks; and iii)
practical approaches to ensure the identified values and
benefits while controlling the risks. |
| format |
Working Paper |
| author |
Kim, Seongjun |
| author_facet |
Kim, Seongjun |
| author_sort |
Kim, Seongjun |
| title |
Side by Side with People : Korea's Experience on Participatory Auditing |
| title_short |
Side by Side with People : Korea's Experience on Participatory Auditing |
| title_full |
Side by Side with People : Korea's Experience on Participatory Auditing |
| title_fullStr |
Side by Side with People : Korea's Experience on Participatory Auditing |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Side by Side with People : Korea's Experience on Participatory Auditing |
| title_sort |
side by side with people : korea's experience on participatory auditing |
| publisher |
World Bank Group, Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2015 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2015/01/24166192/side-side-people-koreas-experience-participatory-auditing http://hdl.handle.net/10986/21675 |
| _version_ |
1764449120593903616 |