Is Random Forest a Superior Methodology for Predicting Poverty? : An Empirical Assessment
Random forest is in many fields of research a common method for data driven predictions. Within economics and prediction of poverty, random forest is rarely used. Comparing out-of-sample predictions in surveys for same year in six countries shows t...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/03/26089791/random-forest-superior-methodology-predicting-poverty-empirical-assessment http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24154 |
Summary: | Random forest is in many fields of
research a common method for data driven predictions. Within
economics and prediction of poverty, random forest is rarely
used. Comparing out-of-sample predictions in surveys for
same year in six countries shows that random forest is often
more accurate than current common practice (multiple
imputations with variables selected by stepwise and Lasso),
suggesting that this method could contribute to better
poverty predictions. However, none of the methods
consistently provides accurate predictions of poverty over
time, highlighting that technical model fitting by any
method within a single year is not always, by itself,
sufficient for accurate predictions of poverty over time. |
---|