Behavioral Interventions in Tax Compliance : Evidence from Guatemala
This paper presents results from a large (43,387) nationwide randomized controlled trial in Guatemala that used reminders to promote tax compliance. The trial varied the letter received by taxpayers (individuals and firms) who had failed to pay the...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Working Paper |
Language: | English en_US |
Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2016/06/26422771/behavioral-interventions-tax-compliance-evidence-guatemala http://hdl.handle.net/10986/24530 |
Summary: | This paper presents results from a large
(43,387) nationwide randomized controlled trial in Guatemala
that used reminders to promote tax compliance. The trial
varied the letter received by taxpayers (individuals and
firms) who had failed to pay their income tax for the 2013
tax year. Taxpayers were randomly allocated to receive
either no letter, the letter originally used by the
Guatemalan Tax Authority, or four letter variants adapted
using behavioral design. The study finds that although all
letters increased the rate of declaration, only two of the
letters were successful at increasing the rate of payment
and the average amount paid per letter received. The best
performing treatments were a deterrent message framing
non-declaration as an intentional and deliberate choice,
rather than oversight (designed to overcome status quo
bias), and a social norms message that referred to the 64.5
percent of taxpayers that had already paid this tax (join
the status quo). These two interventions increased the rate
of payment as well as the average amount paid conditional on
paying, overall more than tripling tax receipts. The paper
estimates that if sent to all taxpayers in the sample, in 11
weeks the social norms letter would have generated
additional tax revenues of approximately US$760,000, which
is 36 times the cost of sending the letters. The effects are
persistent and remain at 12 month follow up, suggesting the
letters are effective in increasing revenue for the tax
authority rather than just bringing tax receipts forward. |
---|