Comparison of Mini-Micro LNG and CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas
The Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership (GGFR) provides its members with overviews of the potential solutions to recover and monetize the flared and/or associated gas. The purpose of this report is to compare the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Report |
| Language: | English en_US |
| Published: |
World Bank, Washington, DC
2017
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/795991484736761603/Comparison-of-Mini-Micro-LNG-and-CNG-for-commercialization-of-small-volumes-of-associated-gas http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25917 |
| id |
okr-10986-25917 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
oai_dc |
| spelling |
okr-10986-259172021-04-23T14:04:32Z Comparison of Mini-Micro LNG and CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas Tractebel Engineering ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES NATURAL GAS EFFICIENCY CONSUMPTION DEMAND FINANCE LNG compressed natural gas CNG liquified natural gas The Global Gas Flaring Reduction Partnership (GGFR) provides its members with overviews of the potential solutions to recover and monetize the flared and/or associated gas. The purpose of this report is to compare the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) chain concepts that could be used to monetise small volumes (1-15MMscf/d) of associated gas and avoid or reduce the current gas flaring. Both LNG and CNG concepts have been developed for over 50 years in similar though not exactly the same ways, and have gained some maturity as a result of the gas market expansion. The CNG and LNG reports analysed the available technologies and the development of the respective chains in specific countries for a better understanding of the mechanism of their evolution and for possible application in other emerging countries. This report will compare both CNG and LNG chain concepts for small volumes monetisation and will identify the drivers that could increase their implementation to reduce gas flaring and its consequential emissions. 2017-01-25T15:52:29Z 2017-01-25T15:52:29Z 2015-10 Report http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/795991484736761603/Comparison-of-Mini-Micro-LNG-and-CNG-for-commercialization-of-small-volumes-of-associated-gas http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25917 English en_US CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Economic & Sector Work :: Mining, Oil, and Gas Economic & Sector Work China Pakistan United States |
| repository_type |
Digital Repository |
| institution_category |
Foreign Institution |
| institution |
Digital Repositories |
| building |
World Bank Open Knowledge Repository |
| collection |
World Bank |
| language |
English en_US |
| topic |
ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES NATURAL GAS EFFICIENCY CONSUMPTION DEMAND FINANCE LNG compressed natural gas CNG liquified natural gas |
| spellingShingle |
ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES NATURAL GAS EFFICIENCY CONSUMPTION DEMAND FINANCE LNG compressed natural gas CNG liquified natural gas Tractebel Engineering Comparison of Mini-Micro LNG and CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas |
| geographic_facet |
China Pakistan United States |
| description |
The Global Gas Flaring Reduction
Partnership (GGFR) provides its members with overviews of
the potential solutions to recover and monetize the flared
and/or associated gas. The purpose of this report is to
compare the Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) and Compressed
Natural Gas (CNG) chain concepts that could be used to
monetise small volumes (1-15MMscf/d) of associated gas and
avoid or reduce the current gas flaring. Both LNG and CNG
concepts have been developed for over 50 years in similar
though not exactly the same ways, and have gained some
maturity as a result of the gas market expansion. The CNG
and LNG reports analysed the available technologies and the
development of the respective chains in specific countries
for a better understanding of the mechanism of their
evolution and for possible application in other emerging
countries. This report will compare both CNG and LNG chain
concepts for small volumes monetisation and will identify
the drivers that could increase their implementation to
reduce gas flaring and its consequential emissions. |
| format |
Report |
| author |
Tractebel Engineering |
| author_facet |
Tractebel Engineering |
| author_sort |
Tractebel Engineering |
| title |
Comparison of Mini-Micro LNG and CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas |
| title_short |
Comparison of Mini-Micro LNG and CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas |
| title_full |
Comparison of Mini-Micro LNG and CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas |
| title_fullStr |
Comparison of Mini-Micro LNG and CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Mini-Micro LNG and CNG for Commercialization of Small Volumes of Associated Gas |
| title_sort |
comparison of mini-micro lng and cng for commercialization of small volumes of associated gas |
| publisher |
World Bank, Washington, DC |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| url |
http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/795991484736761603/Comparison-of-Mini-Micro-LNG-and-CNG-for-commercialization-of-small-volumes-of-associated-gas http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25917 |
| _version_ |
1764460525329055744 |