Social Learning about Environmental Innovations : Experimental Analysis of Adoption Timing

Laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate how private and public information affect the selection of an innovation and the timing of adoption. The results shed light on the behavioral anomaly called the “energy-efficiency gap” in which c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamison, Julian C, Owens, David, Woroch, Glenn
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
en_US
Published: World Bank, Washington, DC 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/732971485375911214/Social-learning-about-environmental-innovations-experimental-analysis-of-adoption-timing
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25963
id okr-10986-25963
recordtype oai_dc
spelling okr-10986-259632021-06-08T14:42:47Z Social Learning about Environmental Innovations : Experimental Analysis of Adoption Timing Jamison, Julian C Owens, David Woroch, Glenn social learning endogenous timing behavioral economics technology diffusion environmental innovations energy efficiency technology adoption Laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate how private and public information affect the selection of an innovation and the timing of adoption. The results shed light on the behavioral anomaly called the “energy-efficiency gap” in which consumers and firms delay adoption of cost-effective energy and environmental innovations. The subjects chose between competing innovations with freedom to select the timing of their adoption, relying on private signals and possibly observation of their peers. When deciding whether to make an irreversible choice between safe and risky technologies, roughly half the subjects delayed adoption beyond the time indicated by equilibrium behavior -- confirming the behavioral anomaly found for environmental innovations. When they did adopt, the subjects gave proportionately more weight to their private signals than to the actions of their peers, implying they do not ‘herd’ on the latter. Nevertheless, when the subjects observed their peers’ decisions, they did accelerate the timing of their adoption despite not necessarily imitating their peers. This result occurred even when the payoffs were statistically independent, as if observing prior adoptions exerted ‘peer pressure’ on the subjects to act. The experimental results suggest that rapid dissemination of information about peer actions can speed up the diffusion of environmental innovations and improve selection among competing technologies. 2017-01-30T20:56:42Z 2017-01-30T20:56:42Z 2017-01 Working Paper http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/732971485375911214/Social-learning-about-environmental-innovations-experimental-analysis-of-adoption-timing http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25963 English en_US Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7955 CC BY 3.0 IGO http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/igo World Bank World Bank, Washington, DC Publications & Research Publications & Research :: Policy Research Working Paper
repository_type Digital Repository
institution_category Foreign Institution
institution Digital Repositories
building World Bank Open Knowledge Repository
collection World Bank
language English
en_US
topic social learning
endogenous timing
behavioral economics
technology diffusion
environmental innovations
energy efficiency
technology adoption
spellingShingle social learning
endogenous timing
behavioral economics
technology diffusion
environmental innovations
energy efficiency
technology adoption
Jamison, Julian C
Owens, David
Woroch, Glenn
Social Learning about Environmental Innovations : Experimental Analysis of Adoption Timing
relation Policy Research Working Paper;No. 7955
description Laboratory experiments were conducted to investigate how private and public information affect the selection of an innovation and the timing of adoption. The results shed light on the behavioral anomaly called the “energy-efficiency gap” in which consumers and firms delay adoption of cost-effective energy and environmental innovations. The subjects chose between competing innovations with freedom to select the timing of their adoption, relying on private signals and possibly observation of their peers. When deciding whether to make an irreversible choice between safe and risky technologies, roughly half the subjects delayed adoption beyond the time indicated by equilibrium behavior -- confirming the behavioral anomaly found for environmental innovations. When they did adopt, the subjects gave proportionately more weight to their private signals than to the actions of their peers, implying they do not ‘herd’ on the latter. Nevertheless, when the subjects observed their peers’ decisions, they did accelerate the timing of their adoption despite not necessarily imitating their peers. This result occurred even when the payoffs were statistically independent, as if observing prior adoptions exerted ‘peer pressure’ on the subjects to act. The experimental results suggest that rapid dissemination of information about peer actions can speed up the diffusion of environmental innovations and improve selection among competing technologies.
format Working Paper
author Jamison, Julian C
Owens, David
Woroch, Glenn
author_facet Jamison, Julian C
Owens, David
Woroch, Glenn
author_sort Jamison, Julian C
title Social Learning about Environmental Innovations : Experimental Analysis of Adoption Timing
title_short Social Learning about Environmental Innovations : Experimental Analysis of Adoption Timing
title_full Social Learning about Environmental Innovations : Experimental Analysis of Adoption Timing
title_fullStr Social Learning about Environmental Innovations : Experimental Analysis of Adoption Timing
title_full_unstemmed Social Learning about Environmental Innovations : Experimental Analysis of Adoption Timing
title_sort social learning about environmental innovations : experimental analysis of adoption timing
publisher World Bank, Washington, DC
publishDate 2017
url http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/732971485375911214/Social-learning-about-environmental-innovations-experimental-analysis-of-adoption-timing
http://hdl.handle.net/10986/25963
_version_ 1764460598315188224